Literature DB >> 32916365

Prevalence and Trends in Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in the United States: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

Mohammed Ali Alvi1, Desmond Brown1, Yagiz Yolcu1, Jad Zreik1, Saad Javeed1, Mohamad Bydon1, Jeremy K Cutsforth-Gregory2, Jonathan Graff-Radford2, David T Jones2, Neill R Graff-Radford3, Petrice M Cogswell4, Benjamin D Elder5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past 2 decades, management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) has evolved significantly. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the national prevalence and management trends of iNPH in the United States using a national database.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients with an International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code for iNPH from 2007 to 2017. Trends in prevalence and procedure type were evaluated per 100,000 discharges and as a percentage of discharges, using weighted discharges. Utilization of procedure type across U.S. regions and hospital types was also compared.
RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, 302,460 weighted discharges with any diagnosis code for iNPH, aged ≥60 years, were identified. Prevalence ranged from 0.04% to 0.20% (41/100,000 to 202/100,000) among admitted patients ≥60 years old, giving an average prevalence during the study duration of 0.18% (179/100,000). Of 66,759 weighted discharges with a primary diagnosis code of iNPH undergoing surgical management, ventriculoperitoneal shunt (72.0% of discharges, n = 48,977) was most commonly used; of these, 9.3% (n = 4567) were performed laparoscopically. This result was followed by lumbar peritoneal shunt (15.1% of discharges, n = 10,441). Up to 15.1% (n = 9990) of discharges reported only a lumbar puncture, assumed to be only diagnostic, for screening, or part of serial cerebrospinal fluid removal procedures. Significant discrepancies in procedure utilization were also identified among hospitals in the Western, Southern, Northeast and Midwest regions, as well as between urban and rural hospitals (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We have summarized the national prevalence of iNPH, trends in its management over the previous decade and trends by region and hospital type.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrocephalus; Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; NIS; NPH; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Shunt; iNPH

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32916365     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive Impairment in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Haoyun Xiao; Fan Hu; Jing Ding; Zheng Ye
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.271

2.  Quantitative Evans index estimation using ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter in supine and upright position.

Authors:  Mindaugas Urbonas; Nijole Raskauskiene; Vytenis Deltuva; Adomas Bunevicius
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  The Pathogenesis Based on the Glymphatic System, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Changwu Tan; Xiaoqiang Wang; Yuchang Wang; Chuansen Wang; Zhi Tang; Zhiping Zhang; Jingping Liu; Gelei Xiao
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  One-year outcome of a lumboperitoneal shunt in older adults with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Xuhao Fang; Yao Deng; Xinxin Xu; Weiquan Shu; Feng Tang; Shihong Li; Ting Zhu; Li Zhang; Ping Zhong; Renling Mao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.