Literature DB >> 32916328

UV-C (254 nm) lethal doses for SARS-CoV-2.

Caetano P Sabino1, Fábio P Sellera2, Douglas F Sales-Medina3, Rafael Rahal Guaragna Machado3, Edison Luiz Durigon3, Lucio H Freitas-Junior3, Martha S Ribeiro4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32916328      PMCID: PMC7477605          DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor The rapid and continuous spread of SARS-CoV-2, responsible for COVID-19, has been challenging global health systems and many strategies have been proposed to face the COVID-19 pandemic crisis [1]. In this scenario, ultraviolet lamps emitting ultraviolet C (UV-C) germicidal radiation (peak emission at 254 nm) are in the spotlight to provide efficient and sustainable disinfection of air, liquids and surfaces (e.g., plastics, fabrics, metals, etc). However, UV light with wavelengths greater than 180 nm can cause health adverse effects as eye damage, skin cancer and ageing, and UV-C should be not used in inhabited environments. Herein, we established the inactivation kinetics and reported the UV-C lethal doses (LD) for SARS-CoV-2. A twenty-four-well plate was seeded with 2 × 105/mL Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) for a final volume of 500 μL/well. Cells were kept in the DMEM High Glucose (DMEN-HG) culture medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 10 % bovine fetal serum, 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Subsequently, the plate was incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h, and then the culture medium was completely removed and replaced by 750 μL of DMEM-HG without supplementation [2,3]. An aliquot of the SARS-CoV-2 stock, previously characterized by Araujo et al. [4], was thawed and 100 μL were diluted in 900 μL of DMEM-HG without supplementation. Then, 200 μL of this dilution were placed in wells of a 24-well plate, which were exposed to the UV-C lamp (UVsurface, Biolambda, Brazil) placed 30 cm above the plate to allow an uniform irradiance over the plate wells (2.2 ± 0.2 mW/cm2). Light was delivered by 2, 30 and 120 s corresponding to doses of 4.4, 66 e 264 mJ/cm2, respectively. Controls were not submitted to irradiation. After exposure to UV-C light, aliquots of 83.4 μL were placed into the plates containing the previously seeded Vero cells and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for viral adsorption. Thereafter, 166.6 μL of DMEM-HG medium containing 12 % fetal bovine serum were added and the plate was incubated for 48 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After that, 100 μL of medium from each well was removed and placed into a lysis buffer solution to proceed with the extraction of the viral RNA using the MagMAX™ CORE Nucleic Acid Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher). After extraction, the number of copies of SARS-CoV-2 per mL was obtained using the RT-qPCR technique. Results were normalized in relation to controls for the calculation of viral inhibition rates of each sample. For the viral inactivation kinetics, we used the methodology reported by Sabino et al. [5]. UV-C inactivation kinetics and lethal doses for SARS-CoV-2 are presented at Fig. 1 and Table 1 , respectively. We verified that within less than a second, UV-C irradiation was able to inactivate more than 99 % of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles. In fact, LD90 and LD99.999 were achieved at 0.016 and 108.714 mJ/cm2 (0.01 and 49.42 s) respectively.
Fig. 1

Inactivation kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 promoted by UV-C radiation at 254 nm.

Table 1

UV-C lethal doses for SARS-CoV-2.

Viral inactivation (%)UV-C dose (mJ/cm2)Exposure time(s)
900.0160.01
990.7060.32
99.96.5562.98
99.9931.88014.49
99.999108.71449.42
Inactivation kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 promoted by UV-C radiation at 254 nm. UV-C lethal doses for SARS-CoV-2. In summary, we report the inactivation kinetics and lethal dose analysis of UV-C radiation, emitted by low-pressure mercury lamps at 254 nm, against SARS-CoV-2, in a controlled in vitro experiment. Our findings can help scientific community and health authorities to develop safe and effective protocols to reduce the dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 during this global health crisis. Thus, we strongly encourage further studies in more realistic situations.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Inactivation kinetics and lethal dose analysis of antimicrobial blue light and photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Caetano P Sabino; Mark Wainwright; Carolina Dos Anjos; Fábio P Sellera; Maurício S Baptista; Nilton Lincopan; Martha S Ribeiro
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.631

2.  SARS-CoV-2 isolation and propagation from Turkish COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Cihan TaŞtan; Bulut Yurtsever; Gözde Sir KarakuŞ; Derya Dİlek KanÇaĞi; Sevda Demİr; Selen Abanuz; Utku Seyİs; Mülazim Yildirim; Recai Kuzay; Ömer Elİbol; Serap Arbak; Merve AÇikel Elmas; Selçuk BİrdoĞan; Osman Uğur Sezerman; Ayşe Sesin KocagÖz; Koray YalÇin; Ercüment Ovali
Journal:  Turk J Biol       Date:  2020-06-21

3.  Inhibition of genes expression of SARS coronavirus by synthetic small interfering RNAs.

Authors:  Yi Shi; De Hua Yang; Jie Xiong; Jie Jia; Bing Huang; You Xin Jin
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  SARS-CoV-2 isolation from the first reported patients in Brazil and establishment of a coordinated task network.

Authors:  Danielle Bastos Araujo; Rafael Rahal Guaragna Machado; Deyvid Emanuel Amgarten; Fernanda de Mello Malta; Gabriel Guarany de Araujo; Cairo Oliveira Monteiro; Erika Donizetti Candido; Camila Pereira Soares; Fernando Gatti de Menezes; Ana Carolina Cornachioni Pires; Rúbia Anita Ferraz Santana; Amanda de Oliveira Viana; Erick Dorlass; Luciano Thomazelli; Luis Carlos de Sousa Ferreira; Viviane Fongaro Botosso; Cristiane Rodrigues Guzzo Carvalho; Danielle Bruna Leal Oliveira; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Edison Luiz Durigon
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.743

  5 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Phototherapy and optical waveguides for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  Dingbowen Wang; Michelle Laurel Kuzma; Xinyu Tan; Tong-Chuan He; Cheng Dong; Zhiwen Liu; Jian Yang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  UVC-based photoinactivation as an efficient tool to control the transmission of coronaviruses.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Bhardwaj; Harpreet Singh; Akash Deep; Madhu Khatri; Jayeeta Bhaumik; Ki-Hyun Kim; Neha Bhardwaj
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  UVC-PURGE: A Novel Cost-Effective Disinfection Robot for Combating COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Akib Zaman; Mohammad Shahjahan Majib; Shoeb Ahmed Tanjim; Shah Md Ahasan Siddique; Shafayetul Islam; Md Shadman Aadeeb; Nafiz Imtiaz Khan; Riasat Haque; Md Rashid Ul Islam; M Rayhan Ferdous Faisal; Siddharth Malik; Muhammad Nazrul Islam
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.476

4.  SARS-CoV-2 inactivation by ultraviolet radiation and visible light is dependent on wavelength and sample matrix.

Authors:  Michael A Schuit; Thomas C Larason; Melissa L Krause; Brian M Green; Brian P Holland; Stewart P Wood; Steven Grantham; Yuqin Zong; Clarence J Zarobila; Denise L Freeburger; David M Miller; Jordan K Bohannon; Shanna A Ratnesar-Shumate; Ernest R Blatchley; Xing Li; Paul A Dabisch; C Cameron Miller
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.814

5.  Inactivation methods for human coronavirus 229E on various food-contact surfaces and foods.

Authors:  Eun Seo Choi; Sangha Han; Jeong Won Son; Gyeong Bae Song; Sang-Do Ha
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.652

Review 6.  The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Chiappa; B Frascella; G P Vigezzi; M Moro; L Diamanti; L Gentile; P Lago; N Clementi; C Signorelli; N Mancini; A Odone
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Coronavirus in water media: Analysis, fate, disinfection and epidemiological applications.

Authors:  Antonio Buonerba; Mary Vermi Aizza Corpuz; Florencio Ballesteros; Kwang-Ho Choo; Shadi W Hasan; Gregory V Korshin; Vincenzo Belgiorno; Damià Barceló; Vincenzo Naddeo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  UltraViolet SANitizing System for Sterilization of Ambulances Fleets and for Real-Time Monitoring of Their Sterilization Level.

Authors:  Zuleika Michelini; Chiara Mazzei; Fabio Magurano; Melissa Baggieri; Antonella Marchi; Mauro Andreotti; Andrea Cara; Alessandro Gaudino; Marco Mazzalupi; Francesca Antonelli; Lorenzo Sommella; Silvia Angeletti; Elena Razzano; Arnaud Runge; Paolo Petrinca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  SARS-CoV-2 Survival on Surfaces and the Effect of UV-C Light.

Authors:  Anna Gidari; Samuele Sabbatini; Sabrina Bastianelli; Sara Pierucci; Chiara Busti; Desirée Bartolini; Anna Maria Stabile; Claudia Monari; Francesco Galli; Mario Rende; Gabriele Cruciani; Daniela Francisci
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 10.  The Role of Indoor Plants in air Purification and Human Health in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Proposal for a Novel Line of Inquiry.

Authors:  Rania El-Tanbouly; Ziad Hassan; Sarah El-Messeiry
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.