Literature DB >> 32915666

An improved process for the fabrication and surface treatment of custom-made titanium cranioplasty implants informed by surface analysis.

Milovan Joe Cardona1, Catherine Turner2, Calum Ross1, Elaine Baird2, Richard Anthony Black1.   

Abstract

Cranioplasty implants are routinely fabricated from commercially pure titanium plates by maxillofacial prosthetists. The differing fabrication protocols adopted by prosthetists working at different hospital sites gives rise to considerable variations in surface topography and composition of cranioplasty implants, with residues from the fabrication processes having been found to become incorporated into the surface of the implant. There is a growing recognition among maxillofacial prosthetists of the need to standardise these protocols to ensure quality and consistency of practice within the profession. In an effort to identify and eliminate the source of the inclusions associated with one such fabrication protocol, the present study examined the surfaces of samples subjected to each of the manufacturing steps involved. Surface and elemental analysis techniques identified the main constituent of the surface inclusions to be silicon from the glass beads used to texture the surface of the implant during fabrication. Subsequent analysis of samples prepared according to a revised protocol resulted in a more homogeneous titanium dioxide surface as evidenced by the reduction in area occupied by surface inclusions (from 8.51% ± 2.60% to 0.93% ± 0.62%). These findings may inform the development of improved protocols for the fabrication of titanium cranioplasty plates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillofacial; craniectomy; elemental analysis; fabrication; passivation; silicon; surface roughness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32915666      PMCID: PMC7756070          DOI: 10.1177/0885328220957899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  37 in total

1.  Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 2.  A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics.

Authors:  Alexander Hoppe; Nusret S Güldal; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Routine but risky: a multi-centre analysis of the outcomes of cranioplasty in the Northeast of England.

Authors:  Ian C Coulter; Jonathan D Pesic-Smith; William B Cato-Addison; Shahid A Khan; Daniel Thompson; Alistair J Jenkins; Roger D Strachan; Nitin Mukerji
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Biomaterial and implant surfaces: on the role of cleanliness, contamination, and preparation procedures.

Authors:  B Kasemo; J Lausmaa
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1988-08

Review 5.  Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanjay Yadla; Peter G Campbell; Rohan Chitale; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Pascal Jabbour; Ashwini D Sharan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of cranioplasty titanium implants following different surface treatments.

Authors:  Muhanad M Hatamleh; Xiaohong Wu; Ahmad Alnazzawi; Jason Watson; David Watts
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Martin Klein; Thomas-Nikolas Lehmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting.

Authors:  B W Darvell; N Samman; W K Luk; R K Clark; H Tideman
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Bone cell expression on titanium surfaces is altered by sterilization treatments.

Authors:  C M Stanford; J C Keller; M Solursh
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 10.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Bernd Stadlinger; Frank Schwarz; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Ole Jung; Clarissa Precht; Frank Kloss; Alexander Gröbe; Max Heiland; Tobias Ebker
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect and mechanism of propranolol on promoting osteogenic differentiation and early implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Yupeng Wu; Qi Zhang; Baodong Zhao; Xiaojing Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.101

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.