Literature DB >> 32915639

Risk Factors for Recurrence After Arthroscopic Instability Repair-The Importance of Glenoid Bone Loss >15%, Patient Age, and Duration of Symptoms: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Travis J Dekker1, Liam A Peebles2, Andrew S Bernhardson1, Samuel I Rosenberg2, Colin P Murphy2, Petar Golijanin3, Matthew T Provencher1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) has been implicated as a risk factor for failure of arthroscopic anterior glenohumeral instability repair. Although certain amounts of GBL are associated with higher recurrence rates, there are limited studies on successes versus failures in these cohorts.
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with and without GBL to determine a threshold percentage of GBL that predicts success. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between 2004 and 2013 were prospectively enrolled. Patients with ≤25% GBL were included. Patients with no GBL were grouped and compared with those having 5% to 25% GBL. Outcomes included Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, Western Ontario Shoulder Index, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, with evidence of recurrent instability. Patients with and without GBL were statistically compared with respect to outcomes and recurrence rates.
RESULTS: Of 434 eligible patients, the cases of 405 (45 female, 360 male; mean age, 27.5 years [range, 18-47 years]) were followed for a mean 61 months (range, 48-96 months). There were 189 (46.6%) with no GBL and 216 (53.3%) with GBL; the mean GBL of the latter cohort was 15% (range, 5%-25%). The mean duration of instability symptoms was 7.9 months (range, 1-21 months) and was significantly longer in the GBL group (P < .05). The mean recurrence rate was 14.8%, which was significantly greater in patients presenting with GBL versus those with none (48/216 [22.2%] vs 12/189 [6.3%]; P < .01). Within the GBL group, GBL ≥15%, duration of symptoms >5 months, and younger age (<20 years) were independent risk factors for failure (P < .01). Patients with any GBL had >4-times greater odds of recurrence after arthroscopic stabilization (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.16-8.21). Moreover, patients presenting for arthroscopic Bankart repair with GBL ≥15% had nearly 3-times greater odds of recurrent instability.
CONCLUSION: GBL ≥15% in an active patient population portends to increased odds of recurrent instability events and inferior clinical outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Furthermore, nonmodifiable risk factors, such as age (<20 years) and duration of symptoms before presentation (>5 months), significantly affect risk of recurrence and should be key factors when counseling patients on risk of failure and determining the ideal procedure for the individual patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroscopic stabilization; glenoid bone loss; glenoid labrum; shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32915639     DOI: 10.1177/0363546520949840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

1.  High correlation between inner and outer glenoid circle diameters and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Antonio Arenas-Miquelez; Orestis Karargyris; Petra L Graham; Ralph Hertel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of perioperative complications following surgical treatment of shoulder instability.

Authors:  Christopher T Eberlin; Nathan H Varady; Michael P Kucharik; Sara A Naessig; Matthew J Best; Scott D Martin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon for Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Jianming Huang; Danlei Huang; Jun Wang; Zhiyang Ye; Haoyuan Liu
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingtao Zhang; Jiaxin Liu; Yaofei Jia; Guangrui Zhang; Jianping Zhou; Ding Wu; Jin Jiang; Xiangdong Yun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Arthroscopic Bankart and Remplissage for Anteroinferior Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss Has a Low Recurrence Rate.

Authors:  Shirish Pathak; Murtaza J Haidermota; Vimal Kumar K H; Parag Sancheti
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 6.  Low grade of osteoarthritis development after Latarjet procedure with a minimum 5 years of follow-up: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Menon; Chiara Fossati; Mauro Magnani; Sara Boveri; Riccardo Compagnoni; Pietro Simone Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Concomitant Glenolabral Articular Disruption (GLAD) Lesion is Not Associated With Inferior Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Bryant P Elrick; Justin W Arner; Marilee P Horan; Joseph J Ruzbarsky; Dylan R Rakowski; Travis J Dekker; Brandon T Goldenberg; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Designing and validating a comparison card method for quantification of glenoid bone defect.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Yichong Zhang; Yufeng Wu; Jingyang Chen; Zexin Hong; Jiabao Ju; Jianhai Chen; Dawei Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.