Literature DB >> 32915448

Assumptions in ecosystem service assessments: Increasing transparency for conservation.

Matthias Schröter1, Emilie Crouzat2,3,4, Lisanne Hölting2, Julian Massenberg2, Julian Rode2, Mario Hanisch2, Nadja Kabisch2,5, Julia Palliwoda2, Jörg A Priess2, Ralf Seppelt2,6, Michael Beckmann2.   

Abstract

Conservation efforts are increasingly supported by ecosystem service assessments. These assessments depend on complex multi-disciplinary methods, and rely on a number of assumptions which reduce complexity. If assumptions are ambiguous or inadequate, misconceptions and misinterpretations may arise when interpreting results of assessments. An interdisciplinary understanding of assumptions in ecosystem service science is needed to provide consistent conservation recommendations. Here, we synthesise and elaborate on 12 prevalent types of assumptions in ecosystem service assessments. These comprise conceptual and ethical foundations of the ecosystem service concept, assumptions on data collection, indication, mapping, and modelling, on socio-economic valuation and value aggregation, as well as about using assessment results for decision-making. We recommend future assessments to increase transparency about assumptions, and to test and validate them and their potential consequences on assessment reliability. This will support the taking up of assessment results in conservation science, policy and practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Decision-making; Ecosystem services; Environmental ethics; Mapping; Valuation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32915448     DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01379-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  1 in total

1.  Smaller farm size and ruminant animals are associated with increased supply of non-provisioning ecosystem services.

Authors:  Johan O Karlsson; Pernilla Tidåker; Elin Röös
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 6.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.