Literature DB >> 32914999

Conducting a meta-analysis in the age of open science: Tools, tips, and practical recommendations.

David Moreau1, Beau Gamble1.   

Abstract

Psychology researchers are rapidly adopting open science practices, yet clear guidelines on how to apply these practices to meta-analysis remain lacking. In this tutorial, we describe why open science is important in the context of meta-analysis in psychology, and suggest how to adopt the 3 main components of open science: preregistration, open materials, and open data. We first describe how to make the preregistration as thorough as possible-and how to handle deviations from the plan. We then focus on creating easy-to-read materials (e.g., search syntax, R scripts) to facilitate reproducibility and bolster the impact of a meta-analysis. Finally, we suggest how to organize data (e.g., literature search results, data extracted from studies) that are easy to share, interpret, and update as new studies emerge. For each step of the meta-analysis, we provide example templates, accompanied by brief video tutorials, and show how to integrate these practices into the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q8stz/). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32914999     DOI: 10.1037/met0000351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  3 in total

Review 1.  Open Science Practices in Gambling Research Publications (2016-2019): A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eric R Louderback; Sally M Gainsbury; Robert M Heirene; Karen Amichia; Alessandra Grossman; Bo J Bernhard; Debi A LaPlante
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 2.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Physical Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Alexandre Mazeas; Martine Duclos; Bruno Pereira; Aïna Chalabaev
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).

Authors:  Rubén López-Nicolás; José Antonio López-López; María Rubio-Aparicio; Julio Sánchez-Meca
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.