Literature DB >> 32914471

Examining the UK Covid-19 mortality paradox: Pandemic preparedness, healthcare expenditure, and the nursing workforce.

Julian Stribling1, Andrew Clifton1, George McGill2, Kay de Vries1.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine the UK pandemic preparedness in light of health expenditure, nursing workforce, and mortality rates in and relation to nursing leadership.
BACKGROUND: The Global Health Security Index categorized the preparedness of 195 countries to face a biological threat on a variety of measures, producing an overall score. The United States of America and the United Kingdom were ranked 1st and 2nd most prepared in 2019.
METHOD: A cross-nation comparison of the top 36 countries ranked by Global Health Security Index score using a variety of online sources, including key data about each nation's expenditure on health and the nursing workforce, and compared these with mortality data for COVID-19.
RESULTS: The extent of a country's pandemic preparedness, expenditure on healthcare and magnitude of the nursing workforce does not appear to impact mortality rates at this stage of the pandemic which is something of a paradox.
CONCLUSION: It is important that arrangements for dealing with future global pandemics involve a range of agencies and experts in the field, including nurse leaders. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: To achieve the best outcomes for patients, nurse leaders should be involved in policy forums at all levels of government to ensure nurses can influence health policy.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Global Health Security Index; healthcare expenditure; nurse leadership; nursing workforce; pandemic preparedness

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32914471     DOI: 10.1111/jan.14562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  3 in total

1.  Analyzing the GHSI puzzle of whether highly developed countries fared worse in COVID-19.

Authors:  Sofija Markovic; Igor Salom; Andjela Rodic; Marko Djordjevic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Development and validation of a lockdown preparedness scale: Understanding lockdown preparedness through a social vulnerability perspective.

Authors:  Zhang Hao Goh; Edson C Tandoc
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.842

Review 3.  Global mapping of epidemic risk assessment toolkits: A scoping review for COVID-19 and future epidemics preparedness implications.

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Long Hoang Nguyen; Linh Phuong Doan; Tham Thi Nguyen; Giang Thu Vu; Hoa Thi Do; Huong Thi Le; Carl A Latkin; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.