Literature DB >> 32914358

Investigation of intraoperative factors associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic left pancreatectomy with stapled closure: a video review-based analysis : Video-review for predictors of pancreatic leak.

Giuseppe Zimmitti1, Roberta La Mendola2, Alberto Manzoni2, Valentina Sega2, Valentina Malerba2, Elio Treppiedi2, Claudio Codignola2, Lorenzo Monfardini3, Marco Garatti2, Edoardo Rosso2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains the most frequent complication, potential precursor of more serious events, and mechanisms behind POPF development are not clear. Primary aim of the current study is to investigate correlations between patients' characteristics, including technical intraoperative data assessed by retrospective video review of laparoscopic DP (L-PD), and development of clinically relevant (CR-)POPF and major complication.
METHODS: Patients undergoing L-DP whose surgery video was available for review were included in this study. Retrospective video review, performed by two surgeons blinded for postoperative outcomes, was focused on pancreatic neck transection and identification of pancreatic capsule disruption (PCD)/staple line bleeding (SLB). Correlation between clinical, demographic, and intraoperative factors and CR-POPF/major complications and assessment of factors associated with PCD and SLB were investigated.
RESULTS: Of 41 L-DP performed at our institution (June 2015-June 2020) using a triple-row stapler (EndoGIA™ Reloads with Tri-Staple™), surgery video was available for 38 patients [men/women, 13/25; median age (range) 62 (25-84) years; median BMI (range) 24 (17-42)]. PCD and SLB occurred in 15(39%) and 19(50%) patients and were concomitant in 9(24%). CR-POPF and major complications occurred in 8(21%) and 12(31%) patients, respectively. PCD, SLB, and PCD + SLB rates were significantly higher among patients with CR-POPF, compared to patients without (all p < 0.05). Among patients with PCD, pancreatic thickness at pancreatic transection site was higher (19 mm), compared to non-PCD patients (13 mm, p < 0.001). A directly proportional relation between PCD, CR-POPF, and major complication rate and pancreatic thickness was confirmed by ROC analysis (AUC = 0.949, 0.798, and 0.740, respectively).
CONCLUSION: PCD and SLB close to the staple line detected by retrospective video-review are intraoperatively detectable indicators of severe pancreatic traumatism and a potential precursors of CR-POPF following L-PD. Given the strict correlation between PCD and pancreatic thickness, alternative techniques to stapled closure for pancreatic transection may be recommended for patients with a thick pancreas and modification in postoperative care may be considered in patients with PCD/SLB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Pancreatic capsule disruption; Pancreatic thickness; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Stapled transection; Video-review analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32914358     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07912-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Venous Tangential Resection: Focus on Periadventitial Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery for Obtaining Negative Margin and a Safe Vascular Resection.

Authors:  Edoardo Rosso; Alberto Manzoni; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Valentina Sega; Elio Treppiedi; Sara Giaccari; Claudio Codignola; Marco Garatti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula by Preoperatively Assessable Factors; Retrospective Review of Unified Operations by Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Masafumi Nakamura; Koji Shindo; Noboru Ideno; Junji Ueda; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Nakashima; Takao Ohtsuka; Shuji Shimizu; Yoshinao Oda; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2014-05

3.  Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: Tips and Tricks.

Authors:  Edoardo Rosso; Sébastien Frey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Alberto Manzoni; Marco Garatti; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Management of the pancreatic transection plane after left (distal) pancreatectomy: Expert consensus guidelines by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

Authors:  Yi Miao; Zipeng Lu; Charles J Yeo; Charles M Vollmer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Paula Ghaneh; Christopher M Halloran; Jörg Kleeff; Thijs de Rooij; Jens Werner; Massimo Falconi; Helmut Friess; Herbert J Zeh; Jakob R Izbicki; Jin He; Johanna Laukkarinen; Cees H Dejong; Keith D Lillemoe; Kevin Conlon; Kyoichi Takaori; Luca Gianotti; Marc G Besselink; Marco Del Chiaro; Marco Montorsi; Masao Tanaka; Maximilian Bockhorn; Mustapha Adham; Attila Oláh; Roberto Salvia; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Thilo Hackert; Tooru Shimosegawa; Amer H Zureikat; Güralp O Ceyhan; Yunpeng Peng; Guangfu Wang; Xumin Huang; Christos Dervenis; Claudio Bassi; John P Neoptolemos; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  ASO Author Reflections: Pushing the Limits of Resection for Left Pancreatic Cancer: from Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy, to Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy, Until Vein Resection for Vascular Tumor Involvement.

Authors:  Giuseppe Zimmitti; Alberto Manzoni; Marco Garatti; Edoardo Rosso
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Slow parenchymal flattening technique for distal pancreatectomy using an endopath stapler: simple and safe technical management.

Authors:  Keiichi Okano; Keitaro Kakinoki; Hironobu Suto; Minoru Oshima; Norikatu Maeda; Hirotaka Kashiwagi; Naoki Yamamoto; Shintaro Akamoto; Masao Fujiwara; Hirotake Takama; Masanobu Hagiike; Hisashi Usuki; Yasuyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

7.  Stapler sizes optimized for pancreatic thickness can reduce pancreatic fistula incidence after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Makoto Nishikawa; Junji Yamamoto; Mayumi Hoshikawa; Takahiro Einama; Takuji Noro; Suefumi Aosasa; Hironori Tsujimoto; Hideki Ueno; Yoji Kishi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.549

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Surgomics: personalized prediction of morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome in surgery using machine learning on multimodal data.

Authors:  Martin Wagner; Johanna M Brandenburg; Sebastian Bodenstedt; André Schulze; Alexander C Jenke; Antonia Stern; Marie T J Daum; Lars Mündermann; Fiona R Kolbinger; Nithya Bhasker; Gerd Schneider; Grit Krause-Jüttler; Hisham Alwanni; Fleur Fritz-Kebede; Oliver Burgert; Dirk Wilhelm; Johannes Fallert; Felix Nickel; Lena Maier-Hein; Martin Dugas; Marius Distler; Jürgen Weitz; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  A novel second-stage surgical strategy for severely obese patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report.

Authors:  Akira Umemura; Akira Sasaki; Hiroyuki Nitta; Hirokatsu Katagiri; Shoji Kanno; Daiki Takeda; Taro Ando; Satoshi Amano; Masao Nishiya; Noriyuki Uesugi; Tamotsu Sugai
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.