| Literature DB >> 32913193 |
Isabel H X Ng1, Alexandra F Bonthrone1, Christopher J Kelly1, Lucilio Cordero-Grande1,2, Emer J Hughes1, Anthony N Price1, Jana Hutter1, Suresh Victor1, Andreas Schuh3, Daniel Rueckert3, Joseph V Hajnal1,4, John Simpson5, A David Edwards1, Mary A Rutherford1, Dafnis Batalle1,6, Serena J Counsell7.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies have demonstrated reduced global and regional brain volumes in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to provide a more detailed evaluation of altered structural brain development in newborn infants with CHD compared to healthy controls using tensor-based morphometry (TBM). We compared brain development in 64 infants with CHD to 192 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. T2-weighted MR images obtained prior to surgery were analysed to compare voxel-wise differences in structure across the whole brain between groups. Cerebral oxygen delivery (CDO2) was measured in infants with CHD (n = 49) using phase contrast MR imaging and the relationship between CDO2 and voxel-wise brain structure was assessed using TBM. After correcting for global scaling differences, clusters of significant volume reduction in infants with CHD were demonstrated bilaterally within the basal ganglia, thalami, corpus callosum, occipital, temporal, parietal and frontal lobes, and right hippocampus (p < 0.025 after family-wise error correction). Clusters of significant volume expansion in infants with CHD were identified in cerebrospinal fluid spaces (p < 0.025). After correcting for global brain size, there was no significant association between voxel-wise brain structure and CDO2. This study localizes abnormal brain development in infants with CHD, identifying areas of particular vulnerability.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32913193 PMCID: PMC7483731 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72009-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic details of infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) and healthy controls.
| Variable | Infants with CHD (n = 64) | Healthy controls (n = 192) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age at birth, weeks | 38.57 (35.29–41.57) | 38.86 (35.14–40.43) | 0.06† |
| Post-menstrual age at scan, weeks | 39.29 (36.43–42.29) | 39.43 (36.43–42.86) | 0.23† |
| Male, no. (%) | 35 (55) | 105 (55) | 1.00# |
| Birth weight, kg | 3.11 (1.81–4.29) | 3.11 (1.87–4.80) | 0.37* |
| Birth weight z-score | − 0.83 (− 4.32 to 1.58) | − 0.65 (− 3.57 to 3.12) | 0.23* |
| Birth head circumference, cm | 33.70 (29.00–38.50) | 34.00 (30.00–37.00) | 0.48† |
| Birth head circumference z-score | − 0.60 (− 4.92 to 3.09) | − 0.27 (− 3.96 to 2.75) | 0.24† |
| Head circumference at scan, cm | 34.00 (29.50–37.40) | 34.00 (28.50–37.50) | 0.35† |
| Head circumference at scan z-score | − 0.81 (− 4.60 to 2.15) | − 0.48 (− 5.61 to 2.70) | 0.30† |
| Spontaneous/induced vaginal delivery | 24 (38) | 58 (30) | 0.07# |
| Instrumental delivery | 11 (17) | 38 (20) | |
| Elective C-section | 7 (11) | 48 (25) | |
| Emergency C-section | 22 (34) | 48 (25) | |
| Transposition of the great arteries | 29 (45) | – | – |
| Coarctation of the aorta | 15 (23) | – | – |
| Hypoplastic left heart syndrome | 3 (5) | – | – |
| Pulmonary atresia | 2 (3) | – | – |
| Tricuspid atresia | 2 (3) | – | – |
| Tetralogy of Fallot | 7 (11) | – | – |
| Pulmonary stenosis | 4 (6) | – | – |
| Truncus arteriosus | 1 (2) | – | – |
| Large ventricular septal defect | 1 (2) | – | – |
Values shown are median (range), except where indicated.
*Student’s t-test used.
†Mann–Whitney U test used.
#Chi-squared test used.
Figure 1Map of t-statistic values of areas of significant (a) reductions and (b) expansions in volumes in infants with congenital heart disease compared to healthy controls (family-wise-error-corrected p < 0.025). Images in 3 planes are shown: (i) axial, (ii) sagittal, (iii) coronal. t-statistic range is shown on the colour bars. Results are overlaid on the template image with post-menstrual age at scan of 40 weeks. Left–right orientation follows radiological convention. Sagittal views are presented from right to left.
Figure 2Flowchart showing number of cases excluded from further analysis.