Literature DB >> 32912880

Lobe of sound: prosthetic rehabilitation of partial auriculectomy defect.

Ashmi Sebastian1, Sanjayagouda B Patil2, Anantha N Sundararajan1, Lakkappa S Ganiger1.   

Abstract

Loss of facial organs in an individual may be due to congenital anomalies or acquired causes. The missing parts of the face like ear, eyes and nose are considered as maxillofacial defects that can be rehabilitated by a prosthesis and/or cosmetic surgeries. This frontier of science has developed into a more reliable and predictable process due to the ever-increasing development of materials and equipments used in this procedure. The fabrication of an ear prosthesis is considered by many prosthetists to be one of the most difficult replacements in maxillofacial reconstruction. The severe undercuts and pronounced convolutions of the ear present a challenge in simulating a naturally proportioned prosthesis. Proper assessment of the disfigured facial organs and a feasible approach to rehabilitating them has for long been the target of clinical maxillofacial prosthodontics. This report describes a simple and engrossing technique to rehabilitate a patient with a partial auricular defect in the most aesthetic and economical manner using medical-grade room temperature vulcanising silicone. © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dentistry and oral medicine; ear; nose and throat/otolaryngology; rehabilitation medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32912880      PMCID: PMC7482485          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-234025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  23 in total

Review 1.  A shade guide for acrylic resin facial prostheses.

Authors:  A J Godoy; J C Lemon; S H Nakamura; G E King
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Bilateral implant-retained auricular prosthesis for a patient with congenitally missing ears. A clinical report.

Authors:  Preeti Satheesh Kumar; K S Satheesh Kumar; Ravindra C Savadi
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Treatment outcome of extraoral implants in the craniofacial region.

Authors:  Banu Karayazgan-Saracoglu; Haluk Zulfikar; Arzu Atay; Yumushan Gunay
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  CAD-CAM generated ear cast by means of a laser scanner and rapid prototyping machine.

Authors:  Leonardo Ciocca; Roberto Scotti
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Osseointegrated implant-supported and magnetically retained ear prosthesis: a clinical report.

Authors:  J W McCartney
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 6.  Osseointegrated implants for replacement of absent or defective ears.

Authors:  A Tjellström
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Fabrication of ear prosthesis.

Authors:  K E Brown
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part I. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for lobule-type microtia.

Authors:  S Nagata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life.

Authors:  Daniela Micheline dos Santos; Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Aldiéres Alves Pesqueira; Lisiane Cristina Bannwart; Maria Cristina Rosifini Alves Rezende; Osvaldo Magro-Filho; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Classification and diagnosis of ear malformations.

Authors:  Sylva Bartel-Friedrich; Cornelia Wulke
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.