S L Hendriks1, A Viljoen2, D Marais3, F A M Wenhold4, A M McIntyre5, M S Ngidi6, J G Annandale3, M Kalaba5, D Stewart7. 1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, PBag X01, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. Sheryl.hendriks@up.ac.za. 2. Department of Consumer Science, University of Pretoria, PBag X01, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. 3. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, PBag X01, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. 4. Department of Human Nutrition, University of Pretoria, X323, Arcadia, Pretoria, 0007, South Africa. 5. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, PBag X01, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa. 6. Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Resource Management, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, PBag01, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa. 7. Lima Rural Development Foundation, 2 Forrester's Lane, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Very little has been researched about the efficacy, effectiveness, feasibility, sustainability and impact of food-based approaches on the diets and nutritional status of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity. This study contributes knowledge about the impact of food-based approaches on the diets of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity in four of the poorest rural communities in South Africa. The study investigated the consumption and production patterns of rural households (278 in summer and 280 in winter) in four sites in the poorest municipalities in South Africa. METHODS: A multistage stratified random sampling technique was applied to identify the communities and sample households for the quantitative survey and qualitative assessments. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected between 2013 and 2015 through focus group discussions (FGDs), key informant interviews and the two-round panel survey to cover both the summer and winter seasons at each site. RESULTS: Home gardening led to a significant positive increase in the consumption of white roots and tubers, dark green leafy vegetables, orange-coloured fruit and other fruit in the 24 h prior to the survey. Participation in a community garden led to significant increases in the consumption of dark green leafy vegetables and other vegetables. School gardening did not demonstrate any statistical relationships with the consumption of foods from the crop-related food groups. Crop production improved dietary diversity. Selling produce and irrigation showed a stronger improvement in dietary diversity. Seasonality affected the availability of fresh fruit and vegetables for home consumption in winter. CONCLUSIONS: Producing beyond that solely for home consumption has greater benefits for dietary diversity and a consumption-smoothing effect during the post-harvest period. Politicians and the scientific community should recognise the role that household and small-scale crop production plays in supporting household consumption and the provision of essential micronutrients despite constraints and disincentives. Production and education programmes should focus on strengthening existing good consumption patterns and promoting the consumption of foods that can improve dietary diversity.
BACKGROUND: Very little has been researched about the efficacy, effectiveness, feasibility, sustainability and impact of food-based approaches on the diets and nutritional status of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity. This study contributes knowledge about the impact of food-based approaches on the diets of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity in four of the poorest rural communities in South Africa. The study investigated the consumption and production patterns of rural households (278 in summer and 280 in winter) in four sites in the poorest municipalities in South Africa. METHODS: A multistage stratified random sampling technique was applied to identify the communities and sample households for the quantitative survey and qualitative assessments. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected between 2013 and 2015 through focus group discussions (FGDs), key informant interviews and the two-round panel survey to cover both the summer and winter seasons at each site. RESULTS: Home gardening led to a significant positive increase in the consumption of white roots and tubers, dark green leafy vegetables, orange-coloured fruit and other fruit in the 24 h prior to the survey. Participation in a community garden led to significant increases in the consumption of dark green leafy vegetables and other vegetables. School gardening did not demonstrate any statistical relationships with the consumption of foods from the crop-related food groups. Crop production improved dietary diversity. Selling produce and irrigation showed a stronger improvement in dietary diversity. Seasonality affected the availability of fresh fruit and vegetables for home consumption in winter. CONCLUSIONS: Producing beyond that solely for home consumption has greater benefits for dietary diversity and a consumption-smoothing effect during the post-harvest period. Politicians and the scientific community should recognise the role that household and small-scale crop production plays in supporting household consumption and the provision of essential micronutrients despite constraints and disincentives. Production and education programmes should focus on strengthening existing good consumption patterns and promoting the consumption of foods that can improve dietary diversity.
Authors: Sheryl L Hendriks; Corné van der Merwe; Mjabuliseni S Ngidi; Christopher Manyamba; Mondli Mbele; Angela M McIntyre; Elizabeth Mkandawire; Queeneth N Molefe; Mulalo Q Mphephu; Lithle Ngwane Journal: Ecol Food Nutr Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 1.692
Authors: Mieke Faber; Michael A S Phungula; Sonja L Venter; Muhammad A Dhansay; A J Spinnler Benadé Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: E Duncan; L Ashton; A R Abdulai; T Sawadogo-Lewis; S E King; E D G Fraser; S Vosti; J Haines; F Knight; T Roberton Journal: Food Secur Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 7.141