| Literature DB >> 32912188 |
Ju Shao1, Shao-Song Zhou2, Yuan Qu1, Bi-Bo Liang1, Qing-Hong Yu1, Jing Wu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone turnover and metabolic indicators are related to age and gender. Age and gender should be matched in subjects in disease control research of bone turnover and metabolism, but strict matching of gender and age increases the difficulty and cost of the research. Therefore, the aim of this study was to solve it is necessary to strictly match age and gender in clinical research in bone metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Age; Bone metabolic; Bone turnover; Children; Gender
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32912188 PMCID: PMC7487991 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03610-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Bone turnover and metabolic indicators are displayed hierarchically by age
| Age phase (year) | 0 ~ 19y | 20 ~ 39y | 40 ~ 69y | 60 ~ 79y | 80y~ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 89 | 62 | 159 | 104 | 8 | 0.000 |
| | 61 | 115 | 246 | 158 | 34 | 0.000 |
| 520.05(340.90,825.28) | 44.18(28.65,71.47) | 44.59 (31.93,69.42) | 44.25(29.66,62.45) | 41.90(31.15,74.64) | 0.000 | |
| 1.35(1.01,1.73) | 0.47(0.30,0.83) | 0.50(0.30,0.75) | 0.56(0.37,0.76) | 0.42(0.28,0.78) | 0.000 | |
| 3.05(2.20,4.20) | 3.40(2.00,4.80) | 3.30(2.47,4.83) | 3.50(2.48,5.60) | 3.25(2.27,5.60) | 0.243 | |
| 2.53(2.43,2.64) | 2.42(2.32,2.51) | 2.41(2.32,2.51) | 2.37(2.27,2.47) | 2.30(2.21,2.42) | 0.000 | |
| 1.56(1.40,1.75) | 1.13(1.00,1.31) | 1.12(1.00,1.27) | 1.11(0.96,1.23) | 1.12(0.90,1.21), | 0.000 | |
| 23.80(18.75,29.20) | 22.60(18.35,26.90) | 22.40(18.00,27.20) | 21.75(16.48,26.55) | 19.20(14.70,26.38) | 0.005 | |
| 221.50(148.98,279.25) | 69.00(54.00,82.50) | 78.50(65.00,103.00) | 80.00(64.00,99.25) | 83.43(63.25,99.00) | 0.000 | |
Data are presented as Median (QR). Statistical tests were made by Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test. P-value among five age groups
Fig. 1a Different expression of serum P1NP concentration in different ages; b Different expression of serum β-CTx concentration in different ages; c Different expression of serum ALP concentration in different ages; d Different expression of serum PTH concentration in different ages; e Different expression of serum Ca concentration in different ages; f Different expression of serum P concentration in different ages; g Different expression of serum 25(OH)D concentration in different ages; p < 0.05 as assessed by Mann–Whitney U test
Fig. 2B Box plots of serum P1NP concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; b Cubic polynomial curves of serum P1NP concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; c Box plots of serum β-CTx concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; d Cubic polynomial curves of serum β-CTx concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; e Box plots of serum Ca concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; f Cubic polynomial curves of serum Ca concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; g Box plots of serum P concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; h Cubic polynomial curves of serum P concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; i Box plots of serum 25(OH)D concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; j Cubic polynomial curves of serum 25(OH)D concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; k Box plots of serum ALP concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; l Cubic polynomial curves of serum ALP concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; m Box plots of serum PTH concentration by age and gender in patients under 20 years; n Exponential curve of serum PTH concentration by age in female patients under 20 years; p < 0.05 as assessed by Regression analysis
Fig. 3a Different expression of serum P1NP concentration in different ages and genders; b Different expression of serum β-CTx concentration in different ages and genders; c Different expression of serum ALP concentration in different ages and genders; d Different expression of serum PTH concentration in different ages and genders; e Different expression of serum Ca concentration in different ages and genders; f Different expression of serum P concentration in different ages and genders; g Different expression of serum 25(OH)D concentration in different ages and genders; p < 0.05 as assessed by Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests
Bone turnover and metabolic indicators are displayed hierarchically by gender and age
| cAge phase (Year) | P1NP (μg/L) | β-CTx (μg/L) | PTH (pmol/L) | Ca (mmol/L) | P (mmol/L) | 25(OH)D (μg/L) | ALP (mmol/L) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||||||||
| 0 ~ 19 | 575.90(341.80,833.15) | 509.60(324.75,792.30) | 0.333 | 1.39(1.05,1.82) | 1.28(0.90,1.66) | 0.167 | 3.15(2.20,3.98) | 3.00(2.18,4.45) | 0.813 | 2.53(2.43,2.64) | 2.56(2.44,2.63) | 0.400 | 1.54(1.40,1.74) | 1.61(1.40,1.74) | 0.937 | 25.15(19.03,29.45) | 25.40(18.13,29.01) | 0.955 | 216.00(148.94,277.50) | 238.50(156.00,292.00) | 0.591 |
| 20 ~ 39 | 52.09(30.31,73.23) | 42.38(27.10,71.26) | 0.134 | 0.93(0.62,1.41) | 0.70(0.42,1.10) | 0.058 | 3.90(2.80,4.85) | 3.20(1.90,4.60) | 0.067 | 2.44(2.33,2.54) | 2.41(2.34,2.49) | 0.297 | 1.10(0.97,1.27) | 1.15(1.00,1.31) | 0.119 | 21.15(18.43,27.00) | 22.70(18.10,26.90) | 0.553 | 80.00(64.75,97.50) | 63.00(51.00.00,89.75.00) | 0.001 |
| 40 ~ 69 | 43.04(31.03,64.26) | 47.07(33.31,72.69) | 0.517 | 0.51(0.33,0.72) | 0.50(0.29,0.79) | 0.526 | 3.30(2.40,4.65) | 3.30(2.40,4.30) | 0.975 | 2.41(2.32,2.50) | 2.42(2.33,2.51) | 0.705 | 1.08(0.97,1.27) | 1.15(1.01,1.27) | 0.016 | 21.00(17.20,27.95) | 22.90(18.20,27.20) | 0.392 | 84.00(69.00,111.00) | 75.00(61.00,97.00) | 0.001 |
| 60 ~ 79 | 38.37(27.49,56.79) | 46.25(31.45,64.55) | 0.099 | 0.54(0.36,0.74) | 0.57(0.37,0.77) | 0.624 | 3.40(2.40,5.25) | 3.65(2.50,4.80) | 0.653 | 2.35(2.23,2.44) | 2.38(2.29,2.48) | 0.036 | 1.00(0.89,1.13) | 1.13(1.01,1.23) | 0.000 | 23.00(17.55,29.23) | 20.60(15.53,25.08) | 0.002 | 85.00(65.75,105.25) | 79.00(63.25,97.75) | 0.283 |
| 80~ | 40.24(30.16,65.30) | 43.57(31.15,77.88) | 0.478 | 0.33(0.19,0.67) | 0.48(0.31,0.85) | 0.329 | 2.80(1.83,3.58) | 4.15(2.28,6.08) | 0.216 | 2.22(2.12,2.3) | 2.34(2.22,2.44) | 0.027 | 0.96(0.90,1.13) | 1.13(0.91,1.32) | 0.182 | 26.10(18.20,30.48) | 17.7(14.63,25.45) | 0.026 | 85.50(71.59,125.5) | 82.43(63.00,99.00) | 0.298 |
| total | 52.22(33.65,162.75) | 48.76(33.55,80.15) | 0.007 | 0.63(0.41,1.13) | 0.52(0.33,0.87) | 0.000 | 3.40(2.40,4.60) | 3.30(2.30,4.60) | 0.983 | 2.42(2.31,2.53) | 2.41(2.32,2.52) | 0.653 | 1.13(0.97,1.42) | 1.16(1.02,1.33) | 0.087 | 22.50(17.70,28.65) | 22.35(17.40,26.80) | 0.036 | 93.00(70.00,148.96) | 77.00(61.00,101.85) | 0.000 |
Data are presented as Median (QR). Statistical test was made by Mann-Whitney test
Fig. 4a Patients received both alfacalcidol and calcium treatment has a difference than other groups in P1NP; b Patients received both alfacalcidol and calcium treatment has a difference than other groups in β-CTx; c Patients received both alfacalcidol and calcium treatment has a difference than other groups in Serum Ca; d Patients received both alfacalcidol and calcium treatment has a difference than other groups in serum P; e Patients received both alfacalcidol and calcium treatment has a difference than other groups in ALP. p < 0.05 as assessed by Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests