Literature DB >> 32911053

Computer versus cardiologist: Is a machine learning algorithm able to outperform an expert in diagnosing a phospholamban p.Arg14del mutation on the electrocardiogram?

Hidde Bleijendaal1, Lucas A Ramos2, Ricardo R Lopes3, Tom E Verstraelen4, Sarah W E Baalman4, Marinka D Oudkerk Pool4, Fleur V Y Tjong4, Francisco M Melgarejo-Meseguer5, F Javier Gimeno-Blanes6, Juan R Gimeno-Blanes7, Ahmad S Amin8, Michiel M Winter4, Henk A Marquering3, Wouter E M Kok4, Aeilko H Zwinderman9, Arthur A M Wilde8, Yigal M Pinto4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phospholamban (PLN) p.Arg14del mutation carriers are known to develop dilated and/or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and typical electrocardiographic (ECG) features have been identified for diagnosis. Machine learning is a powerful tool used in ECG analysis and has shown to outperform cardiologists.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop machine learning and deep learning models to diagnose PLN p.Arg14del cardiomyopathy using ECGs and evaluate their accuracy compared to an expert cardiologist.
METHODS: We included 155 adult PLN mutation carriers and 155 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Twenty-one PLN mutation carriers (13.4%) were classified as symptomatic (symptoms of heart failure or malignant ventricular arrhythmias). The data set was split into training and testing sets using 4-fold cross-validation. Multiple models were developed to discriminate between PLN mutation carriers and control subjects. For comparison, expert cardiologists classified the same data set. The best performing models were validated using an external PLN p.Arg14del mutation carrier data set from Murcia, Spain (n = 50). We applied occlusion maps to visualize the most contributing ECG regions.
RESULTS: In terms of specificity, expert cardiologists (0.99) outperformed all models (range 0.53-0.81). In terms of accuracy and sensitivity, experts (0.28 and 0.64) were outperformed by all models (sensitivity range 0.65-0.81). T-wave morphology was most important for classification of PLN p.Arg14del carriers. External validation showed comparable results, with the best model outperforming experts.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that machine learning can outperform experienced cardiologists in the diagnosis of PLN p.Arg14del cardiomyopathy and suggests that the shape of the T wave is of added importance to this diagnosis.
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiomyopathy; Deep learning; ECG analysis; Genetic heart disease; Machine learning; Phospholamban

Year:  2020        PMID: 32911053     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  3 in total

1.  Electrocardiogram-based mortality prediction in patients with COVID-19 using machine learning.

Authors:  R R van de Leur; H Bleijendaal; K Taha; T Mast; J M I H Gho; M Linschoten; B van Rees; M T H M Henkens; S Heymans; N Sturkenboom; R A Tio; J A Offerhaus; W L Bor; M Maarse; H E Haerkens-Arends; M Z H Kolk; A C J van der Lingen; J J Selder; E E Wierda; P F M M van Bergen; M M Winter; A H Zwinderman; P A Doevendans; P van der Harst; Y M Pinto; F W Asselbergs; R van Es; F V Y Tjong
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.854

2.  Automatic Identification of Patients With Unexplained Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Electronic Health Record Data to Improve Targeted Treatment and Family Screening.

Authors:  Arjan Sammani; Mark Jansen; Nynke M de Vries; Nicolaas de Jonge; Annette F Baas; Anneline S J M Te Riele; Folkert W Asselbergs; Marish I F J Oerlemans
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 3.  State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Petmezas; Leandros Stefanopoulos; Vassilis Kilintzis; Andreas Tzavelis; John A Rogers; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Nicos Maglaveras
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.