Literature DB >> 32910841

Variation in key leaf photosynthetic traits across wheat wild relatives is accession dependent not species dependent.

Lorna McAusland1, Silvere Vialet-Chabrand2, Iván Jauregui3, Amanda Burridge4, Stella Hubbart-Edwards1, Michael J Fryer2, Ian P King1, Julie King1, Kevin Pyke1, Keith J Edwards4, Elizabete Carmo-Silva3, Tracy Lawson2, Erik H Murchie1.   

Abstract

The wild relatives of modern wheat represent an underutilized source of genetic and phenotypic diversity and are of interest in breeding owing to their wide adaptation to diverse environments. Leaf photosynthetic traits underpin the rate of production of biomass and yield and have not been systematically explored in the wheat relatives. This paper identifies and quantifies the phenotypic variation in photosynthetic, stomatal, and morphological traits in up to 88 wheat wild relative accessions across five genera. Both steady-state measurements and dynamic responses to step changes in light intensity are assessed. A 2.3-fold variation for flag leaf light and CO2 -saturated rates of photosynthesis Amax was observed. Many accessions showing higher and more variable Amax , maximum rates of carboxylation, electron transport, and Rubisco activity when compared with modern genotypes. Variation in dynamic traits was also significant; with distinct genus-specific trends in rates of induction of nonphotochemical quenching and rate of stomatal opening. We conclude that utilization of wild relatives for improvement of photosynthesis is supported by the existence of a high degree of natural variation in key traits and should consider not only genus-level properties but variation between individual accessions. ©2020 The Authors New Phytologist ©2020 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990T. aestivumzzm321990; Rubisco; genotyping; photosynthesis; stomata; wild relatives

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32910841     DOI: 10.1111/nph.16832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  6 in total

1.  Variation of Photosynthetic Induction in Major Horticultural Crops Is Mostly Driven by Differences in Stomatal Traits.

Authors:  Ningyi Zhang; Sarah R Berman; Dominique Joubert; Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Leo F M Marcelis; Elias Kaiser
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Photosynthesis research under climate change.

Authors:  Sajad Hussain; Zaid Ulhassan; Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev; Xinghong Yang; Muhammad Ehsan Safdar; Wenyu Yang; Weiguo Liu
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Changes in root microbiome during wheat evolution.

Authors:  Somayeh Gholizadeh; Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 4.  Progenitor species hold untapped diversity for potential climate-responsive traits for use in wheat breeding and crop improvement.

Authors:  Fiona J Leigh; Tally I C Wright; Richard A Horsnell; Sarah Dyer; Alison R Bentley
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.832

5.  Genetics as a key to improving crop photosynthesis.

Authors:  Tom P J M Theeuwen; Louise L Logie; Jeremy Harbinson; Mark G M Aarts
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 7.298

Review 6.  A model-guided holistic review of exploiting natural variation of photosynthesis traits in crop improvement.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin; Junfei Gu; Michael Dingkuhn; Paul C Struik
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 7.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.