David Dreizin1, Remberto Rosales1, Guang Li2, Hassan Syed1, Rong Chen2. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
METHODS: This work is a retrospective secondary analysis of a single institution cohort used in the development of the Baltimore CT prediction model. The cohort includes 115 consecutive patients that underwent admission contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis for blunt trauma with pelvic ring disruption followed by conventional angiography. Major arterial injury requiring angioembolization served as the outcome variable. Angioembolization was required in 73/115 patients (63% of the cohort). Average age was 46.9 years (±SD 20.4). Body composition measurements were determined as 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D) parameters and included mid-L3 trabecular bone attenuation, abdominal visceral fat area or volume, and percent muscle fat fraction (as a marker of sarcopenia) measured using segmentation and histogram analysis. RESULTS: Models incorporating 2D (Model B) or 3D markers (model C) of body composition showed improvement over the original Baltimore model (model A) in all parameters of performance, quality, and fit (area under the receiver-operating curve [AUC], Akaike information criterion, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and adjusted-R2). Area under the receiver-operating curve increased from 0.83 (A), to 0.86 (B), and 0.88 (C). The greatest improvement was seen with 3D parameters. CONCLUSION: Once automated, quantitative visualization tools providing "free" 3D body composition information can be expected to improve personalized precision diagnostics, outcome prediction, and decision support in patients with bleeding pelvic fractures.
METHODS: This work is a retrospective secondary analysis of a single institution cohort used in the development of the Baltimore CT prediction model. The cohort includes 115 consecutive patients that underwent admission contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis for blunt trauma with pelvic ring disruption followed by conventional angiography. Major arterial injury requiring angioembolization served as the outcome variable. Angioembolization was required in 73/115 patients (63% of the cohort). Average age was 46.9 years (±SD 20.4). Body composition measurements were determined as 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D) parameters and included mid-L3 trabecular bone attenuation, abdominal visceral fat area or volume, and percent muscle fat fraction (as a marker of sarcopenia) measured using segmentation and histogram analysis. RESULTS: Models incorporating 2D (Model B) or 3D markers (model C) of body composition showed improvement over the original Baltimore model (model A) in all parameters of performance, quality, and fit (area under the receiver-operating curve [AUC], Akaike information criterion, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and adjusted-R2). Area under the receiver-operating curve increased from 0.83 (A), to 0.86 (B), and 0.88 (C). The greatest improvement was seen with 3D parameters. CONCLUSION: Once automated, quantitative visualization tools providing "free" 3D body composition information can be expected to improve personalized precision diagnostics, outcome prediction, and decision support in patients with bleeding pelvic fractures.
Authors: David Dreizin; Uttam Bodanapally; Daniel Mascarenhas; Robert V O'Toole; Nikki Tirada; Ghada Issa; Jason Nascone Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Margaret H Lauerman; Maxwell Raithel; Joseph Kufera; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Brandon R Bruns; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein Journal: Injury Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Stephen J Kaplan; Tam N Pham; Saman Arbabi; Joel A Gross; Mamatha Damodarasamy; Itay Bentov; Lisa A Taitsman; Steven H Mitchell; May J Reed Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David Dreizin; Uttam K Bodanapally; Nagaraj Neerchal; Nikki Tirada; Michael Patlas; Edward Herskovits Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2016-11
Authors: Morgan Q Oskutis; Margaret H Lauerman; Joseph A Kufera; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Cynthia Burch; Timothy Kerns; Shiu Ho; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: David Dreizin; Yuanyuan Liang; James Dent; Nabeel Akhter; Daniel Mascarenhas; Thomas M Scalea Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 2.469