OBJECTIVES: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is infrequently used in the United States but is an effective treatment for pediatric Crohn disease (CD). Limited data exists regarding patient and parent perspectives on this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to determine parent and provider perspectives regarding EEN and understand parent-cited barriers to its use. METHODS: We surveyed the parents/guardians of children ages 1 through 17 with CD in our institution regarding EEN. Healthcare provider perspectives regarding reason for stopping EEN and those cited by survey respondents were compared using retrospective chart review. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen (62.5%) out of 184 recipients responded to the survey. Ninety percentage of respondents had heard of EEN but of these, 26% had not discussed it with their gastroenterologist. Thirty-eight patients (33%) were treated in the past and 15 (13%) were currently on EEN. Common barriers cited by current EEN users were cost/finances and difficult social situations. Of the children who stopped EEN, most did so as parents felt it was not working (n = 14, 37%). In these cases, their primary gastroenterologist cited treatment failure for 4 cases and nonadherence for 6. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the efficacy of EEN and interest in dietary treatments by patients with CD, there are many barriers surrounding effective communication and successful implementation of dietary therapies. Future research is needed regarding patient-physician communication, cost mitigation, and coping with the social limitations of dietary therapies.
OBJECTIVES: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is infrequently used in the United States but is an effective treatment for pediatric Crohn disease (CD). Limited data exists regarding patient and parent perspectives on this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to determine parent and provider perspectives regarding EEN and understand parent-cited barriers to its use. METHODS: We surveyed the parents/guardians of children ages 1 through 17 with CD in our institution regarding EEN. Healthcare provider perspectives regarding reason for stopping EEN and those cited by survey respondents were compared using retrospective chart review. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen (62.5%) out of 184 recipients responded to the survey. Ninety percentage of respondents had heard of EEN but of these, 26% had not discussed it with their gastroenterologist. Thirty-eight patients (33%) were treated in the past and 15 (13%) were currently on EEN. Common barriers cited by current EEN users were cost/finances and difficult social situations. Of the children who stopped EEN, most did so as parents felt it was not working (n = 14, 37%). In these cases, their primary gastroenterologist cited treatment failure for 4 cases and nonadherence for 6. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the efficacy of EEN and interest in dietary treatments by patients with CD, there are many barriers surrounding effective communication and successful implementation of dietary therapies. Future research is needed regarding patient-physician communication, cost mitigation, and coping with the social limitations of dietary therapies.
Authors: You-You Luo; You-Hong Fang; Jin-Dan Yu; Luo-Jia Xu; Ming-Fang Sun; Qi Cheng; Jie Chen Journal: Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Lara Hart; Charlotte M Verburgt; Eytan Wine; Mary Zachos; Alisha Poppen; Mallory Chavannes; Johan Van Limbergen; Nikhil Pai Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 5.717