Literature DB >> 32910508

Mechanistic Effect Modeling of Earthworms in the Context of Pesticide Risk Assessment: Synthesis of the FORESEE Workshop.

Valery E Forbes1, Annika Agatz2, Roman Ashauer3,4, Kevin R Butt5, Yvan Capowiez6, Sabine Duquesne7, Gregor Ernst8, Andreas Focks9, Andre Gergs8, Mark E Hodson4, Martin Holmstrup10, Alice Sa Johnston11, Mattia Meli12, Dirk Nickisch13, Silvia Pieper7, Kim J Rakel14, Melissa Reed15, Joerg Roembke16, Ralf B Schäfer17, Pernille Thorbek18, David J Spurgeon19, Erik Van den Berg9, Cornelis Am Van Gestel20, Mathilde I Zorn21, Vanessa Roeben14.   

Abstract

Earthworms are important ecosystem engineers, and assessment of the risk of plant protection products toward them is part of the European environmental risk assessment (ERA). In the current ERA scheme, exposure and effects are represented simplistically and are not well integrated, resulting in uncertainty when the results are applied to ecosystems. Modeling offers a powerful tool to integrate the effects observed in lower tier laboratory studies with the environmental conditions under which exposure is expected in the field. This paper provides a summary of the (In)Field Organism Risk modEling by coupling Soil Exposure and Effect (FORESEE) Workshop held 28-30 January 2020 in Düsseldorf, Germany. This workshop focused on toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) and population modeling of earthworms in the context of ERA. The goal was to bring together scientists from different stakeholder groups to discuss the current state of soil invertebrate modeling and to explore how earthworm modeling could be applied to risk assessments, in particular how the different model outputs can be used in the tiered ERA approach. In support of these goals, the workshop aimed at addressing the requirements and concerns of the different stakeholder groups to support further model development. The modeling approach included 4 submodules to cover the most relevant processes for earthworm risk assessment: environment, behavior (feeding, vertical movement), TKTD, and population. Four workgroups examined different aspects of the model with relevance for risk assessment, earthworm ecology, uptake routes, and cross-species extrapolation and model testing. Here, we present the perspectives of each workgroup and highlight how the collaborative effort of participants from multidisciplinary backgrounds helped to establish common ground. In addition, we provide a list of recommendations for how earthworm TKTD modeling could address some of the uncertainties in current risk assessments for plant protection products. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:352-363.
© 2020 SETAC. © 2020 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-species extrapolation; Plant protection products; Population modeling; Soil organisms; Uptake routes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32910508     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  1 in total

1.  Integrating earthworm movement and life history through dynamic energy budgets.

Authors:  Andre Gergs; Kim Rakel; Dino Bussen; Yvan Capowiez; Gregor Ernst; Vanessa Roeben
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.252

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.