Literature DB >> 32910151

Assessment of Doxorubicin and Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Anthracycline-Naive Sarcoma: A Phase 1/2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Seth M Pollack1,2, Mary W Redman1,2,3, Kelsey K Baker1, Michael J Wagner1,2, Brett A Schroeder1,4, Elizabeth T Loggers1,2, Kathryn Trieselmann1,2, Vanessa C Copeland1,2, Shihong Zhang1, Graeme Black1, Sabrina McDonnell1,2, Jeffrey Gregory1,2, Rylee Johnson1,2, Roxanne Moore1,2, Robin L Jones5, Lee D Cranmer1,2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Anthracycline-based therapy is standard first-line treatment for most patients with advanced and metastatic sarcomas. Although multiple trials have attempted to show improved outcomes in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma over doxorubicin monotherapy, each has fallen short of demonstrating improved outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of doxorubicin in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, anthracycline-naive sarcomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized clinical trial used a 2-stage phase 2 design and was performed at a single, academic sarcoma specialty center. Patients were adults with good performance status and end-organ function. Patients with all sarcoma subtypes were allowed to enroll with the exception of osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.
INTERVENTIONS: Two dose levels of doxorubicin (45 and 75 mg/m2) were tested for safety in combination with pembrolizumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. Correlative studies included immunohistochemistry, gene expression, and serum cytokines.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (22 men; 15 women) were treated in the combined phase 1/2 trial. The median (range) patient age was 58.4 (25-80) years. The most common histologic subtype was leiomyosarcoma (11 patients). Doxorubicin plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated without significant unexpected toxic effects. The ORR was 13% for phase 2 patients and 19% overall. Median PFS was 8.1 (95% CI, 7.6-10.8) months. Median OS was 27.6 (95% CI, 18.7-not reached) months at the time of this analysis. Two of 3 patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and 2 of 4 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma had durable partial responses. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were present in 21% of evaluable tumors and associated with inferior PFS (log-rank P = .03). No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, doxorubicin plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated. Although the primary end point for ORR was not reached, the PFS and OS observed compared favorably with prior published studies. Further studies are warranted, especially those focusing on undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02888665.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32910151      PMCID: PMC7489365          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


Introduction

Patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) generally receive first-line therapy with doxorubicin alone or with ifosfamide.[1] Median overall survival (OS) for doxorubicin alone ranges from 12.8 to 20.4 months, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 to 6.8 months and objective response rates (ORRs) of 12% to 20%.[1,2,3,4,5] Multiple trials combining doxorubicin with investigational agents have failed to show improved outcomes.[1,2,3,4,5,6] Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is variably expressed by STS, especially undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs).[7,8] Responses to pembrolizumab monotherapy have been seen in STS, particularly UPS,[9] and some, though not all,[10] combination therapies may be associated with improved programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade.[11,12,13] Chemotherapy may synergize with immunotherapy by depleting suppressive immune cells, releasing damage-associated molecular patterns and increasing tumor antigen presentation through tumor toxicity.[14] We conducted a phase 1/2 trial to assess the tolerability and outcomes of treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with doxorubicin.

Methods

Patients, Treatment Schedules, and Supportive Care

All research herein was reviewed and approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Institutional Review Board. All patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The trial protocol can be found in Supplement 1. Race and ethnicity data were self-reported and collected for institutional reporting requirements. Pathology was confirmed at the University of Washington. Adult patients with sarcoma with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma were ineligible because well-established alternative regimens exist (eFigure 1 in Supplement 2). Patients’ initial cycle was pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously) alone. Cycles were 21 days. Starting with cycle 2, doxorubicin was given prior to pembrolizumab, same day, every 3 weeks, for up to 6 cycles. After cycle 7, pembrolizumab treatment continued for up to 2 years (see eFigure 2A in Supplement 2). Growth factors were not permitted until cycle 3 during phase 1. Imaging, performed every 12 weeks, was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1 with the option of confirming progressive disease (PD) in clinically well patients.

Trial Design, Statistical Basis, and End Points

Two doses of doxorubicin (45 and 75 mg/m2) were evaluated with pembrolizumab using a 3 + 3 design. A dose-limiting toxic effect was defined as any possibly related, unexpected, grade 3 or greater serious adverse events, or any possibly related adverse event requiring discontinuation of either drug during the first 6 weeks of combination treatment (eFigure 2B in Supplement 2). The primary end point of the phase 2 portion of the study was the ORR as assessed by RECIST 1.1.[15] The 2-stage study was designed to rule out ORR of 15% or less with 85% power if the true ORR was 35%, using a 1-sided 5% level test. If 2 or more responses were observed in the 20-patient first stage, an additional 15 patients would accrue. If 10 or more responses of 35 patients (29%) were observed, this would rule out a 15% ORR. Although the primary end points were evaluated for the phase 1 and 2 cohorts separately, data were combined in other analyses. Data were analyzed as of September 2019. The OS was calculated as the duration from the start of treatment to death due to any cause, and PFS as the duration from start to progression or death. Outcomes were censored at the date of last contact for living patients (OS) or living and progression free (PFS). For these secondary end points, 2-sided P values less than .05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute); Excel, version 16.33 (Microsoft Corp); and Prism, version 8.4 (GraphPad Software) (see eFigure 3 in Supplement 2 for detailed methods regarding correlative analyses).

Results

Patient Demographic Characteristics

In the combined phase 1/2 trial, 37 patients (22 men; 15 women) were treated, including 6 phase 1 patients—3 patients at each dose. Both phase 2 stages enrolled, but accrual was closed at 31 of 35 planned patients because of an insufficient number of second-stage partial responses (PRs), indicating that the study would not achieve the primary end point. The most common histology was leiomyosarcoma, present in 11 patients (30%), 3 being uterine leiomyosarcomas. Demographic characteristics, including histology, are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.

Patient Demographic Characteristics

CharacteristicNo. (%) (N = 37)
Age at day 1, median (range), y58.4 (25.8-80.4)
Sex
Female15 (41)
Male22 (59)
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native2 (6)
Asian2 (6)
Black or African American1 (3)
White/other32 (85)
No. of prior lines of systemic treatment
028 (76)
17 (19)
22 (5)
Doxorubicin dose, mg/m2
453 (8)
7534 (92)
Best response
Not evaluable1 (3)
Partial response7 (19)
Progressive disease7 (19)
Stable disease22 (59)
Disease
Alveolar soft-part sarcoma1 (3)
Angiosarcoma1 (3)
Clear cell chondrosarcoma1 (3)
Conventional chondrosarcoma3 (8)
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma4 (11)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma2 (5)
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma2 (5)
Epithelioid sarcoma1 (3)
Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma1 (3)
Hemangiopericytoma1 (3)
Leiomyosarcoma11 (30)
Myxofibrosarcoma1 (3)
Pleomorphic liposarcoma1 (3)
Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma1 (3)
Solitary fibrous tumor2 (5)
Spindle cell sarcoma1 (3)
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma3 (8)

Safety

No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed. The phase 2 dose was 75 mg/m2. In both phase 1 and 2 cohorts, the most common toxic effects were nausea (n = 32) and fatigue (n = 21) (see Table 2; eTable 1 in Supplement 2). No grade 5 toxic effects were seen; the only attributable grade 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (n = 6), leukopenia (n = 1), and febrile neutropenia (1), all of which resolved. Two patients had grade 3 reductions in ejection fraction attributable to doxorubicin. Notable pembrolizumab-related toxic effects included grade 3 adrenal insufficiency (n = 1) and hypothyroidism (n = 7).
Table 2.

Adverse Events

Adverse event No. Total No. of events
Grade
1234
Adverse events with at least 2 grade 3 or 4 events
Ejection fraction decreased00202
Lymphocyte count decreased00202
Febrile neutropenia01113
White blood cell count decreased00213
Anemia21205
Neutrophil count decreased01269
Mucositis, oral373013
Anorexia972018
Other adverse events with at least 4 events
Rash, maculopapular22004
Upper respiratory tract infection22004
Dyspnea31004
Headache31004
Constipation41005
Rash42006
Hypomagnesemia60006
Weight loss41106
Fever61007
Hypothyroidism24107
Dry eye71008
Diarrhea52108
Pruritus81009
Dysgeusia730010
Vomiting560011
Dry mouth1010011
Alopecia4100014
Fatigue11100021
Nausea15161032

Tumor Response

In the combined phase 1/2 trial, confirmed PRs were seen in 7 of 37 patients (19%), 4 in the phase 2 cohort (13%) and 3 in the 75 mg/m2 phase 1 cohort (Figure, A). Two patients had unconfirmed PRs, and 11 patients had stable disease with tumor regression as their best response (Figure, B). One patient came off study for increasing symptoms prior to follow-up imaging. Two of 3 patients with UPS, and 2 of 4 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma had durable PRs (eFigure 4 in Supplement 2). Three patients with chondrosarcoma had tumor regression, including 1 conventional chondrosarcoma with a 26% decrease in size.
Figure.

Patient Responses

A, Waterfall plot demonstrating the percentage change in tumor size from baseline constituting the best response for each patient. B, Spider plots showing responses for all patients.

Patient Responses

A, Waterfall plot demonstrating the percentage change in tumor size from baseline constituting the best response for each patient. B, Spider plots showing responses for all patients.

Survival Outcomes

Median PFS was 8.1 (95% CI, 7.6-10.8) months, with 29 of 37 patients (78.4%) having had an event and 4 patients with continuing stable disease or PR at the time of this analysis. The PFS rates at 12 and 24 weeks were 81% (95% CI, 64%-90%) and 73% (95% CI, 56%-84%), respectively. At 12 months, the PFS was 27% (95% CI, 14%-42%). Median OS was 27.6 (95% CI, 18.7-not reached) months at the time of this analysis.

Correlative Studies

Immunohistochemistry was evaluable for 29 patients; 66% had PD-L1 expression scores of 0, reflecting a low level of PD-L1 expression (eTable 2 in Supplement 2). Expression of PD-L1 was not associated with PFS or OS. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were present in 21% of evaluable tumors and associated with inferior PFS (log-rank P = .03) (eFigure 5 in Supplement 2). This was confirmed in a multivariate Cox regression analysis that adjusted for age, sex, and number of prior therapies (P = .04; eTable 3 in Supplement 2). Nanostring data were available for 24 patients (eTable 4 in Supplement 2). No gene was significantly associated with PFS after correction for multiple comparisons. Serum cytokine levels were assessed before treatment and during cycles 1 and 2. Granulocyte macrophage–colony-stimulating factor levels increased each cycle, and IL-15 levels dropped following doxorubicin treatment. Circulating IL-2R, IP10, and CD30 levels rose sharply after cycle 1, while levels of IL-8 dropped.

Discussion

This nonrandomized phase 1/2 trial demonstrated that doxorubicin plus pembrolizumab can be given safely and may be associated with clinical benefit for patients with advanced sarcoma. While the combined ORR observed here is similar to prior published series, the PFS and OS seen here are encouraging.[2,3,4,6] In correlative studies, we found that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were associated with inferior PFS. This may reflect more aggressive tumor biology rather than as association with the PD-1 inhibitor.

Limitations

Similar to other sarcoma trials, histologic subtypes likely influenced these results. Our trial, like others, demonstrated a higher response rate and clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in UPS compared with other sarcoma subtypes,[11] despite their generally worse prognosis.[5] Durable PRs were also seen in 2 of 4 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Chondrosarcomas are generally resistant to doxorubicin; inclusion of these patients in the study likely lowered the ORR. Still, 2 patients with chondrosarcoma had durable disease regression, suggesting that doxorubicin/pembrolizumab may benefit these patients. For patients with these selected subtypes, follow-up studies are warranted.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy and Biomarkers in Sarcoma.

Authors:  Thanate Dajsakdipon; Teerada Siripoon; Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon; Touch Ativitavas; Thitiya Dejthevaporn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 2.  Immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Vanessa Eulo; Brian A Van Tine
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients Treated with a Combination of an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Doxorubicin.

Authors:  Seon-Hwa Lee; Iksung Cho; Seng-Chan You; Min-Jae Cha; Jee-Suk Chang; William D Kim; Kyu-Yong Go; Dae-Young Kim; Jiwon Seo; Chi-Young Shim; Geu-Ru Hong; Seok-Min Kang; Jong-Won Ha; Sun-Young Rha; Hyo-Song Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  A Phase 1/2 Trial Combining Avelumab and Trabectedin for Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Michael J Wagner; Yuzheng Zhang; Lee D Cranmer; Elizabeth T Loggers; Graeme Black; Sabrina McDonnell; Shannon Maxwell; Rylee Johnson; Roxanne Moore; Pedro Hermida de Viveiros; Lauri Aicher; Kimberly S Smythe; Qianchuan He; Robin L Jones; Seth M Pollack
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 5.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitory Therapy in Sarcomas: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Authors:  Vasiliki Siozopoulou; Andreas Domen; Karen Zwaenepoel; Annelies Van Beeck; Evelien Smits; Patrick Pauwels; Elly Marcq
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  The Sarcoma Immune Landscape: Emerging Challenges, Prognostic Significance and Prospective Impact for Immunotherapy Approaches.

Authors:  Anna Koumarianou; Jose Duran-Moreno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Translating Molecular Profiling of Soft Tissue Sarcomas into Daily Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Celine Jacobs; Lore Lapeire
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-14

8.  Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) combination therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhichao Tian; Shuping Dong; Yang Yang; Shilei Gao; Yonghao Yang; Jinpo Yang; Peng Zhang; Xin Wang; Weitao Yao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Chemotherapy Combined With Recombinant Human Endostatin (Endostar) Significantly Improves the Progression-Free Survival of Stage IV Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Zhichao Liao; Chao Zhang; Tielong Yang; Haotian Liu; Songwei Yang; Ting Li; Ruwei Xing; Sheng Teng; Yun Yang; Jun Zhao; Gang Zhao; Xu Bai; Lei Zhu; Jilong Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with doxorubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: an observational study.

Authors:  Zhiyong Liu; Cuiping Liu; Weitao Yao; Songtao Gao; Jiaqiang Wang; Peng Zhang; Hong Ge
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.248

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.