Literature DB >> 32909244

ImmunoPET Imaging of Pancreatic Tumors with 89Zr-Labeled Gold Nanoparticle-Antibody Conjugates.

Nicholas B Sobol1, Joshua A Korsen1,2, Ali Younes3, Kimberly J Edwards1, Jason S Lewis4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Targeted delivery in vivo remains an immense roadblock for the translation of nanomaterials into the clinic. The greatest obstacle is the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which sequesters foreign substances from general circulation and causes accumulation in organs such as the liver and spleen. The purpose of this study was to determine whether attaching an active targeting antibody, 5B1, to the surface of gold nanoparticles and using clodronate liposomes to deplete liver and splenic macrophages could help to minimize uptake by MPS organs, increase targeted delivery to CA19.9-positive pancreatic tumors, and enhance pancreatic tumor delineation. PROCEDURES: To produce the antibody-gold nanoparticle conjugate (Ab-AuNP), the Ab was conjugated to p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (p-SCN-DFO) and subsequently conjugated to NHS-activated gold nanoparticles. The Ab-AuNP was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Modified Lindmo assay was performed to assess binding affinity and internalization potential in vitro. The Ab-AuNP was radiolabeled with 89Zr and injected into CA19.9-positive BxPc-3 pancreatic orthotopic tumor-bearing mice pretreated with or without clodronate liposomes for PET imaging and biodistribution studies. Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis was used to confirm delivery of gold nanoparticles to BxPc-3 pancreatic subcutaneous xenografts.
RESULTS: Mice pretreated with clodronate liposomes in an orthotopic setting demonstrated decreased liver uptake at early time points (12.2 ± 2.3 % ID/g vs. 22.8 ± 3.8 % ID/g at 24 h) and increased tumor uptake at 120 h (13.8 ± 8.0 % ID/g vs. 6.0 ± 1.2 % ID/g). This allowed for delineation of orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in significantly more mice treated with clodronate (6/6) than in mice not treated with clodronate (2/6) or mice injected with gold nanoparticles labeled with a nonspecific antibody (0/5).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of clodronate liposomes and an active targeting antibody on the surface of gold nanoparticles allowed for PET/CT imaging of subcutaneous and orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in mice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody-labeled nanoparticles; Clodronate liposomes; Gold nanoparticles; PET/CT imaging; Pancreatic cancer; Radiolabeled antibody; Zirconium-89

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32909244      PMCID: PMC7785666          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01535-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  32 in total

Review 1.  Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications.

Authors:  Partha Ghosh; Gang Han; Mrinmoy De; Chae Kyu Kim; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles: Will they ever make it to the clinic?

Authors:  Lei Cui; Sohyoung Her; Gerben R Borst; Robert G Bristow; David A Jaffray; Christine Allen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Effective delivery of chemotherapeutic nanoparticles by depleting host Kupffer cells.

Authors:  Yusuke Ohara; Tatsuya Oda; Keiichi Yamada; Shinji Hashimoto; Yoshimasa Akashi; Ryoichi Miyamoto; Akihiko Kobayashi; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Ryoko Sasaki; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Tatsiana Lobovkina; Richard N Zare; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Rachela Popovtzer; Ashish Agrawal; Nicholas A Kotov; Aron Popovtzer; James Balter; Thomas E Carey; Raoul Kopelman
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery.

Authors:  Elvin Blanco; Haifa Shen; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  Biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization.

Authors:  Soraia Rosa; Chris Connolly; Giuseppe Schettino; Karl T Butterworth; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-02-02

8.  Preloading with Unlabeled CA19.9 Targeted Human Monoclonal Antibody Leads to Improved PET Imaging with 89Zr-5B1.

Authors:  Jacob L Houghton; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Wolfgang W Scholz; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Gold Nanoparticles-enabled Efficient Dual Delivery of Anticancer Therapeutics to HeLa Cells.

Authors:  Muhammad U Farooq; Valentyn Novosad; Elena A Rozhkova; Hussain Wali; Asghar Ali; Ahmed A Fateh; Purnima B Neogi; Arup Neogi; Zhiming Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Passive versus active tumor targeting using RGD- and NGR-modified polymeric nanomedicines.

Authors:  Sijumon Kunjachan; Robert Pola; Felix Gremse; Benjamin Theek; Josef Ehling; Diana Moeckel; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Michal Pechar; Karel Ulbrich; Wim E Hennink; Gert Storm; Wiltrud Lederle; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  ImmunoPET: Antibody-Based PET Imaging in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid; Bahar Ataeinia; Shaghayegh Ranjbar; Zahra Jamshidi Araghi; Mohammad Mobin Moradi; Christian Pirich; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 2.  Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Katherina P Farr; Daniel Moses; Koroush S Haghighi; Phoebe A Phillips; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Boon H Chua
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Nanocarriers for pancreatic cancer imaging, treatments, and immunotherapies.

Authors:  Luman Liu; Prakash G Kshirsagar; Shailendra K Gautam; Mansi Gulati; Emad I Wafa; John C Christiansen; Brianna M White; Surya K Mallapragada; Michael J Wannemuehler; Sushil Kumar; Joyce C Solheim; Surinder K Batra; Aliasger K Salem; Balaji Narasimhan; Maneesh Jain
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.