Literature DB >> 32909145

Strain analysis using feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) in the assessment of myocardial viability in chronic ischemic patients.

Sara W Tantawy1,2, Shaimaa Abdelsattar Mohammad3, Ahmed M Osman3, Wesam El Mozy4,5, Ahmed S Ibrahim3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to test the capability of a commercially available feature tracking-cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) strain analysis software module in differentiating between viable and non-viable myocardium in chronic ischemic patients. Thirty chronic ischemic patients and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Cine images were used for peak circumferential and radial strains quantification using dedicated FT-CMR software. Global strain was compared between patients and controls. In patients, segmental strain was compared in viable and non-viable myocardium determined by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE); and in segments with wall abnormalities. Among 480 myocardial segments analyzed in patients, 76 segments were non-viable on LGE. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the patients (87% males, mean age 55 ± 12 years) was 40 ± 12% vs. 61 ± 5% for the controls (80% males, mean age 39 ± 11 years). Peak global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) were significantly impaired in patients compared to controls (-13.89 ± 4.12% vs. -19.84 ± 1.47%), p < 0.001 and (23.11 ± 6.59% vs. 31.72 ± 5.52%), p = 0.001. Segmental circumferential strain (SCS) and segmental radial strain (SRS) were significantly impaired in non-viable compared to viable segments (-9.47 ± 7.26% vs. -14.72 ± 7.5%), p < 0.001 and (15.67 ± 12.11% vs. 24.51 ± 16.22%), p < 0.001. Cut-off points of -9.36% for the SCS (AUC = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.63-0.77) and 19.5% for the SRS (AUC = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.61-0.73) were attained above which the segment is considered viable.SCS was able to discriminate between normokinetic, hypokinetic and akinetic segments (mean = 27.6 ± 17.13%, 18.66 ± 12.88% and 15.24 ± 10.70% respectively, p < 0.001). Circumferential and radial segmental strain analysis by FT-CMR was able to discriminate between viable and non-viable segments of the myocardium defined by LGE and between normokinetic, hypokinetic and akinetic segments, using routinely acquired cine images, and thus can provide a more objective metric for risk stratification in chronic ischemic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic ischemia; Feature tracking; Myocardial viability; Strain

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32909145     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02018-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  10 in total

1.  Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and 2D/3D echocardiography speckle tracking for evaluation of global left ventricular strain.

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Yasufumi Nagata; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Yuichiro Kado; Masahiko Kurabayashi; Yutaka Otsuji; Masaaki Takeuchi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Diagnostic concordance of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance-based tissue tracking for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Makoto Amaki; John Savino; David L Ain; Javier Sanz; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Hemant Kulkarni; Jagat Narula; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Analysis of myocardial deformation based on ultrasonic pixel tracking to determine transmurality in chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael Becker; Rainer Hoffmann; Harald P Kühl; Helena Grawe; Markus Katoh; Rafael Kramann; Arno Bücker; Peter Hanrath; Nicole Heussen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Samir K Saha; Antonia Delgado-Montero; Daniel R Ludwig; Tetsuari Onishi; Erik B Schelbert; David Schwartzman; John Gorcsan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Speckle-Tracking Layer-Specific Analysis of Myocardial Deformation and Evaluation of Scar Transmurality in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Michela Tarascio; Laura Anna Leo; Catherine Klersy; Romina Murzilli; Tiziano Moccetti; Francesco Fulvio Faletra
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Value of delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization.

Authors:  Joseph B Selvanayagam; Attila Kardos; Jane M Francis; Frank Wiesmann; Steffen E Petersen; David P Taggart; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Validation of echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain imaging for viability assessment in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stijntje D Roes; Sjoerd A Mollema; Hildo J Lamb; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and tagging for the assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; Anvesha Singh; Sheraz A Nazir; Prathap Kanagala; Anthony H Gershlick; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Feature tracking measurement of dyssynchrony from cardiovascular magnetic resonance cine acquisitions: comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Samir K Saha; Daniel R Ludwig; Tetsuari Onishi; Josef J Marek; João L Cavalcante; Erik B Schelbert; David Schwartzman; John Gorcsan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Segmental strain for scar detection in acute myocardial infarcts and in follow-up exams using non-contrast CMR cine sequences.

Authors:  Malgorzata Polacin; Mihaly Karolyi; Matthias Eberhard; Ioannis Matziris; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Kozerke; Robert Manka
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.174

2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Fatigue Injury during Exercise.

Authors:  Zhengguo Ai; Na Li; Jing An; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.750

3.  Segmental strain analysis for the detection of chronic ischemic scars in non-contrast cardiac MRI cine images.

Authors:  M Polacin; M Karolyi; M Eberhard; A Gotschy; B Baessler; H Alkadhi; S Kozerke; R Manka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.