Literature DB >> 32908319

Small-scale density variations in the lunar crust revealed by GRAIL.

J C Jansen1, J C Andrews-Hanna2, Y Li1, P G Lucey3, G J Taylor3, S Goossens4, F G Lemoine4, E Mazarico4, J W Head5, C Milbury6, W S Kiefer7, J M Soderblom8, M T Zuber8.   

Abstract

Data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission have revealed that ~98% of the power of the gravity signal of the Moon at high spherical harmonic degrees correlates with the topography. The remaining 2% of the signal, which cannot be explained by topography, contains information about density variations within the crust. These high-degree Bouguer gravity anomalies are likely caused by small-scale (10's of km) shallow density variations. Here we use gravity inversions to model the small-scale three-dimensional variations in the density of the lunar crust. Inversion results from three non-descript areas yield shallow density variations in the range of 100-200 kg/m3. Three end-member scenarios of variations in porosity, intrusions into the crust, and variations in bulk crustal composition were tested as possible sources of the density variations. We find that the density anomalies can be caused entirely by changes in porosity. Characteristics of density anomalies in the South Pole-Aitken basin also support porosity as a primary source of these variations. Mafic intrusions into the crust could explain many, but not all of the anomalies. Additionally, variations in crustal composition revealed by spectral data could only explain a small fraction of the density anomalies. Nevertheless, all three sources of density variations likely contribute. Collectively, results from this study of GRAIL gravity data, combined with other studies of remote sensing data and lunar samples, show that the lunar crust exhibits variations in density by ±10% over scales ranging from centimeters to 100's of kilometers.

Year:  2017        PMID: 32908319      PMCID: PMC7477950          DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Icarus        ISSN: 0019-1035            Impact factor:   3.508


  8 in total

1.  The origin of lunar mascon basins.

Authors:  H J Melosh; Andrew M Freed; Brandon C Johnson; David M Blair; Jeffrey C Andrews-Hanna; Gregory A Neumann; Roger J Phillips; David E Smith; Sean C Solomon; Mark A Wieczorek; Maria T Zuber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The global distribution of pure anorthosite on the Moon.

Authors:  Makiko Ohtake; Tsuneo Matsunaga; Junichi Haruyama; Yasuhiro Yokota; Tomokatsu Morota; Chikatoshi Honda; Yoshiko Ogawa; Masaya Torii; Hideaki Miyamoto; Tomoko Arai; Naru Hirata; Akira Iwasaki; Ryosuke Nakamura; Takahiro Hiroi; Takamitsu Sugihara; Hiroshi Takeda; Hisashi Otake; Carle M Pieters; Kazuto Saiki; Kohei Kitazato; Masanao Abe; Noriaki Asada; Hirohide Demura; Yasushi Yamaguchi; Sho Sasaki; Shinsuke Kodama; Junya Terazono; Motomaro Shirao; Atsushi Yamaji; Shigeyuki Minami; Hiroaki Akiyama; Jean-Luc Josset
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Gravity field of the Moon from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission.

Authors:  Maria T Zuber; David E Smith; Michael M Watkins; Sami W Asmar; Alexander S Konopliv; Frank G Lemoine; H Jay Melosh; Gregory A Neumann; Roger J Phillips; Sean C Solomon; Mark A Wieczorek; James G Williams; Sander J Goossens; Gerhard Kruizinga; Erwan Mazarico; Ryan S Park; Dah-Ning Yuan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ancient igneous intrusions and early expansion of the Moon revealed by GRAIL gravity gradiometry.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Andrews-Hanna; Sami W Asmar; James W Head; Walter S Kiefer; Alexander S Konopliv; Frank G Lemoine; Isamu Matsuyama; Erwan Mazarico; Patrick J McGovern; H Jay Melosh; Gregory A Neumann; Francis Nimmo; Roger J Phillips; David E Smith; Sean C Solomon; G Jeffrey Taylor; Mark A Wieczorek; James G Williams; Maria T Zuber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The crust of the Moon as seen by GRAIL.

Authors:  Mark A Wieczorek; Gregory A Neumann; Francis Nimmo; Walter S Kiefer; G Jeffrey Taylor; H Jay Melosh; Roger J Phillips; Sean C Solomon; Jeffrey C Andrews-Hanna; Sami W Asmar; Alexander S Konopliv; Frank G Lemoine; David E Smith; Michael M Watkins; James G Williams; Maria T Zuber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Farside gravity field of the moon from four-way Doppler measurements of SELENE (Kaguya).

Authors:  Noriyuki Namiki; Takahiro Iwata; Koji Matsumoto; Hideo Hanada; Hirotomo Noda; Sander Goossens; Mina Ogawa; Nobuyuki Kawano; Kazuyoshi Asari; Sei-Itsu Tsuruta; Yoshiaki Ishihara; Qinghui Liu; Fuyuhiko Kikuchi; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Sho Sasaki; Chiaki Aoshima; Kosuke Kurosawa; Seiji Sugita; Tadashi Takano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  GRGM900C: A degree 900 lunar gravity model from GRAIL primary and extended mission data.

Authors:  Frank G Lemoine; Sander Goossens; Terence J Sabaka; Joseph B Nicholas; Erwan Mazarico; David D Rowlands; Bryant D Loomis; Douglas S Chinn; Gregory A Neumann; David E Smith; Maria T Zuber
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.720

8.  Lunar impact basins revealed by Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory measurements.

Authors:  Gregory A Neumann; Maria T Zuber; Mark A Wieczorek; James W Head; David M H Baker; Sean C Solomon; David E Smith; Frank G Lemoine; Erwan Mazarico; Terence J Sabaka; Sander J Goossens; H Jay Melosh; Roger J Phillips; Sami W Asmar; Alexander S Konopliv; James G Williams; Michael M Sori; Jason M Soderblom; Katarina Miljković; Jeffrey C Andrews-Hanna; Francis Nimmo; Walter S Kiefer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.