Literature DB >> 32907910

Discriminative value of glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) as a diagnostic tool in acute stroke. Individual patient data meta-analysis.

Juan Antonio Cabezas1, Alejandro Bustamante2, Nicola Giannini3, Emilio Pecharroman2, Aristeidis H Katsanos4, Georgios Tsivgoulis5, Michal Rozanski6, Heinrich Audebert6, Stefania Mondello7, Victor Llombart2, Joan Montaner8,9.   

Abstract

Glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) in serum has been evaluated as a promising biomarker to differentiate between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We assessed its value as diagnostic and prognostic tool for ICH through a literature systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.We performed a systematic search in PubMed database until November 2018 for publications that evaluated GFAP to differentiate AIS and ICH within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset. Thereafter, we invited authors of selected studies to participate in this work by providing IPD from their cohorts. We used standardized individual subject's data to evaluate the association of GFAP concentrations with stroke subtype, demographics, stroke characteristics and factors related with GFAP measurement.From 4 selected studies, we collected data of 340 patients (236 AIS and 104 ICH). Standardized GFAP blood levels were significantly elevated in ICH compared with those with AIS (median and IQR: 0.84 (0.781-1.24), 0.79 (0.74-0.81); p<0.0001). In both stroke types, GFAP concentrations correlated with baseline stroke severity (r=0.27, p<0.0001; r=0.36, p<0.001; for AIS and ICH, respectively) but no correlation was found regarding time to sampling. Limited data precluded the evaluation of GFAP levels and functional outcome.These findings demonstrate substantially different levels of GFAP in the blood of patients with ICH compared with patients with AIS soon after the event, while no association was found with outcome. In summary, GFAP could be a valuable diagnostic tool to assist in medical decision-making and to optimize management of stroke in the acute setting. © American Federation for Medical Research 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; stroke

Year:  2020        PMID: 32907910     DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  Detection, Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Smita Patil; Rosanna Rossi; Duaa Jabrah; Karen Doyle
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Neurological Involvement in COVID-19 Among Non-Hospitalized Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Lise Beier Havdal; Lise Lund Berven; Joel Selvakumar; Tonje Stiansen-Sonerud; Truls Michael Leegaard; Trygve Tjade; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Vegard Bruun Bratholm Wyller
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Serum GFAP for stroke diagnosis in regions with limited access to brain imaging (BE FAST India).

Authors:  Love-Preet Kalra; Himani Khatter; Sarvotham Ramanathan; Sameer Sapehia; Kavita Devi; Abirami Kaliyaperumal; Deepti Bal; Ivy Sebastian; Raviteja Kakarla; Anusha Singhania; Shubhra Rathore; Svenja Klinsing; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Christian Foerch
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 4.  Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Marie Dagonnier; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Helen M Dewey; David W Howells
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Protective multi‑target effects of DL‑3‑n‑butylphthalide combined with 3‑methyl‑1‑phenyl‑2‑pyrazolin‑5‑one in mice with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Yali Guan; Pengfei Li; Yingshuo Liu; Lan Guo; Qingwen Wu; Yuefa Cheng
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.