Literature DB >> 32907828

Dual-Hormone Closed-Loop System Using a Liquid Stable Glucagon Formulation Versus Insulin-Only Closed-Loop System Compared With a Predictive Low Glucose Suspend System: An Open-Label, Outpatient, Single-Center, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leah M Wilson1, Peter G Jacobs2, Katrina L Ramsey3, Navid Resalat2, Ravi Reddy2, Deborah Branigan4, Joseph Leitschuh2, Virginia Gabo4, Florian Guillot4, Brian Senf4, Joseph El Youssef4,2, Isabelle Isa Kristin Steineck5, Nichole S Tyler2, Jessica R Castle4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and feasibility of a dual-hormone (DH) closed-loop system with insulin and a novel liquid stable glucagon formulation compared with an insulin-only closed-loop system and a predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a 76-h, randomized, crossover, outpatient study, 23 participants with type 1 diabetes used three modes of the Oregon Artificial Pancreas system: 1) dual-hormone (DH) closed-loop control, 2) insulin-only single-hormone (SH) closed-loop control, and 3) PLGS system. The primary end point was percentage time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) from the start of in-clinic aerobic exercise (45 min at 60% VO2max) to 4 h after.
RESULTS: DH reduced hypoglycemia compared with SH during and after exercise (DH 0.0% [interquartile range 0.0-4.2], SH 8.3% [0.0-12.5], P = 0.025). There was an increased time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) during and after exercise for DH versus SH (20.8% DH vs. 6.3% SH, P = 0.038). Mean glucose during the entire study duration was DH, 159.2; SH, 151.6; and PLGS, 163.6 mg/dL. Across the entire study duration, DH resulted in 7.5% more time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) compared with the PLGS system (71.0% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.044). For the entire study duration, DH had 28.2% time in hyperglycemia vs. 25.1% for SH (P = 0.044) and 34.7% for PLGS (P = 0.140). Four participants experienced nausea related to glucagon, leading three to withdraw from the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The glucagon formulation demonstrated feasibility in a closed-loop system. The DH system reduced hypoglycemia during and after exercise, with some increase in hyperglycemia.
© 2020 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32907828     DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  12 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery.

Authors:  Julia Ware; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 2.  Strategically Playing with Fire: SGLT Inhibitors as Possible Adjunct to Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy.

Authors:  Melissa-Rosina Pasqua; Michael A Tsoukas; Ahmad Haidar
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-09-24

Review 3.  Current Status and Emerging Options for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Rayhan A Lal
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.337

4.  Adjunctive Therapies to Optimize Closed-loop Glucose Control.

Authors:  Shylaja Srinivasan; Laya Ekhlaspour; Eda Cengiz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-27

Review 5.  Dual-hormone artificial pancreas for management of type 1 diabetes: Recent progress and future directions.

Authors:  Marco Infante; David A Baidal; Michael R Rickels; Andrea Fabbri; Jay S Skyler; Rodolfo Alejandro; Camillo Ricordi
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.663

Review 6.  Current Advances of Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Sun Joon Moon; Inha Jung; Cheol-Young Park
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.376

7.  Quantifying the impact of physical activity on future glucose trends using machine learning.

Authors:  Nichole S Tyler; Clara Mosquera-Lopez; Gavin M Young; Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Peter G Jacobs
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Pharmacokinetics of glucagon after intravenous, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration in a pig model.

Authors:  Ingrid Anna Teigen; Marte Kierulf Åm; Sven Magnus Carlsen; Sverre Christian Christiansen
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 9.  Fault Tolerant Strategies for Automated Insulin Delivery Considering the Human Component: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Aleix Beneyto; B Wayne Bequette; Josep Vehi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-21

Review 10.  Best Achievements in Clinical Medicine in Diabetes and Dyslipidemia in 2020.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Rhee; Mee-Kyung Kim; Won-Young Lee
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.