Literature DB >> 32907778

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and screening for monogenic disorders.

E Scotchman1, J Shaw1, B Paternoster1, N Chandler2, L S Chitty3.   

Abstract

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in the maternal circulation from 4 weeks gestation, and is present with cell-free maternal DNA at a level of between 5 % and 20 %. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be extracted from a maternal blood sample and, although it is not possible to separate the fetal from the maternal cfDNA, it has enabled non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) without the associated miscarriage risk that accompanies invasive testing. NIPD for monogenic diseases was first reported in 2000 and since then there have been many proof of principle studies showing how analysis of cfDNA can provide a definitive diagnosis early in pregnancy for a wide range of single gene diseases. Testing for a number of these diseases has been available in the UK National Health Service (NHS) since 2012. This review highlights the main techniques that are being used for NIPD and discusses the technical limitations of the methods, as well as the advances that are being made to overcome some of the issues. NIPD is technologically challenging for a number of reasons. Firstly, because it requires the detection of low level fetal variants in a high maternal background. For de novo and paternally-inherited variants this has been achieved through the use of techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR to detect variants in the cffDNA that are not present in the maternal cfDNA. However, for maternally-inherited variants this is much more challenging and relies on dosage-based techniques to detect small differences in the levels of mutant and wild-type alleles. Alongside the technical advances that are making NIPD more widely available in both the public healthcare and commercial settings, it is crucial that we continue to monitor the social and ethical impact to ensure that patients are being offered safe and accurate testing.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free fetal DNA; Monogenic disease; Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32907778     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis based on cell-free DNA for tuberous sclerosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Yang; Yan Meng; Yang-Yang Wang; Yan-Ping Lu; Qiu-Hong Wang; Yan-Qin You; Xiao-Xiao Xie; Ling Bai; Nan Fang; Li-Ping Zou
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 2.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Luigi Carbone; Federica Cariati; Laura Sarno; Alessandro Conforti; Francesca Bagnulo; Ida Strina; Lucio Pastore; Giuseppe Maria Maruotti; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  Prenatal Detection of Uniparental Disomies (UPD): Intended and Incidental Finding in the Era of Next Generation Genomics.

Authors:  Thomas Eggermann
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Non-Invasive Detection of a De Novo Frameshift Variant of STAG2 in a Female Fetus: Escape Genes Influence the Manifestation of X-Linked Diseases in Females.

Authors:  Aldesia Provenzano; Andrea La Barbera; Francesco Lai; Andrea Perra; Antonio Farina; Ettore Cariati; Orsetta Zuffardi; Sabrina Giglio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Noninvasive fetal genotyping of single nucleotide variants and linkage analysis for prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders.

Authors:  Wenman Wu; Xuanyou Zhou; Zhengwen Jiang; Dazhi Zhang; Feng Yu; Lanlan Zhang; Xuefeng Wang; Songchang Chen; Chenming Xu
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.