| Literature DB >> 32907616 |
Shaowei Zhao1, Hao Wang1, Shuang Zhang1, Suzhu Xie1, Hang Li1, Xuancheng Zhang1, Lijun Jia2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a tick-borne hemoprotozoan disease of equids, caused by Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. Equine piroplasmosis represents a serious challenge to the equine industry due to important economic losses worldwide. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in equids from Jilin Province, China.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Equine piroplasmosis; Genetic diversity; Risk factors; Theileria equi
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32907616 PMCID: PMC7479743 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04338-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Prevalence of equine piroplasmosis in each area of China
| Region | Diagnostic method | Positive rates (%) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (95% CI) | |||||
| Xinjiang | PCR | 40.8 (37.2–44.4) | na | 40.8 (37.2–44.4) | [ |
| Yunnan | ELISA | 37.6 (32.1–43.1) | 67.1 (61.7–72.5) | 73.8 (68.8–78.8) | [ |
| Guangdong | ELISA | 7.7 (6.2–9.2) | 3.2 (2.2–4.2) | 10.9 (9.1–12.7) | [ |
| Shanghai | ELISA | 29.2 (23.2–35.3) | na | 29.2 (23.2–35.3) | [ |
| Shanxi | ELISA | 1.0 (0.0–2.5) | 44.3 (37.2–51.4) | 44.3 (37.2–51.4) | [ |
| Hebei | ELISA | 30.2 (17.4–43.0) | 28.3 (15.8–40.8) | 54.7 (40.9–68.6) | [ |
| Jiangsu | ELISA | 4.0 (1.4–6.5) | 35.2 (29.0–41.5) | 37.4 (31.1–43.8) | [ |
| Beijing | ELISA | 2.0 (0.0–4.3) | 34.2 (26.5–41.9) | 34.9 (27.2–42.6) | [ |
| Guizhou | PCR | 74.0 (66.1–81.8) | 11.4 (5.7–17.1) | 74.0 (66.1–81.8) | [ |
| Ningxia | ELISA | 4.0 (1.3–6.7) | 77.6 (71.8–83.4) | 80.1 (74.5–85.7) | [ |
| Gansu | PCR | 28.1 (22.4–33.8) | 2.9 (0.8–5.0) | 31.0 (25.1–36.9) | [ |
Abbreviation: na, not available
Fig. 1Map of the sampling districts in Jilin, China. The number within each region represents the sample size collected in this study
Primer sequences for the amplification of T. equi and/or B. caballi
| Organism-s | Target gene | Assay | Product size (bp) | Primer | Sequence 5′–3′ | Annealing temperature (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18S rRNA | PCR | 435 | P1 | TCGAAGACGATCAGATACCGTCG | 60 | [ | |
| P2 | TGCCTTAAACTTCCTTGCGAT | ||||||
| BC48 | Nested PCR | 454 | P3 | ACGAATTCCCACAACAGCCGTGTT | 55 | [ | |
| P4 | ACGAATTCGTAAAGCGTGGCCATG | ||||||
| P5 | GGGCGACGTGACTAAGACCTTATT | ||||||
| P6 | GTTCTCAATGTCAGTAGCATCCGC | ||||||
| 18S rRNA | Nested PCR | ~ 1400 | P7 | GAAAYTGCGAATGGCTCATTAM | 57 | [ | |
| P8 | CACCGGATCACTCGATCGGTAGG | ||||||
| P9 | GGATAACCGTGSTAATTSTAGGGC | ||||||
| P10 | GTGTGTACAAAGGGCAGGGACG |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree based on the partial sequences of the 18S rRNA gene of T. equi. The ML tree and Bayesian inference were implemented by MEGA7 with a Tamura 3-parameter model and MrBayes3.2 with the GTR + G + I model, respectively. The numbers at the nodes represent the ML bootstrap and BI posterior probability values. Bootstrap values < 70 and posterior probabilities < 0.95 are not shown. The gene sequences of T. equi obtained in the present study are indicated by a triangle. The five groups (A, B, C, D and E) represent the different T. equi genotypes
Results of the univariate analyses for the prevalence of T. equi
| Variable | Samples tested (positive/total samples tested) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | ||||||
| Liaoyuan | 9/43 | 20.9 | 8.3–33.6 | Ref | ||
| Baicheng | 13/30 | 43.3 | 24.5–62.2 | 2.89 | 1.03–8.09 | 0.04* |
| Jilin | 7/30 | 23.3 | 7.3–39.4 | 1.15 | 0.38–3.53 | 0.80 |
| Yanbian | 19/72 | 26.4 | 16.0–36.8 | 1.35 | 0.55–3.34 | 0.51 |
| Tonghua | 13/45 | 28.9 | 15.1–42.7 | 1.54 | 0.58–4.08 | 0.39 |
| Management | ||||||
| Unorganized | 44/127 | 34.6 | 26.3–43.0 | Ref | ||
| Organized | 17/93 | 18.3 | 10.3–26.3 | 0.42 | 0.22–0.80 | 0.007** |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 10/62 | 16.1 | 6.7–25.5 | Ref | ||
| Female | 51/158 | 32.3 | 24.9–39.6 | 2.48 | 1.17–5.27 | 0.016* |
| Species | ||||||
| Horse | 54/192 | 28.1 | 21.7–34.5 | Ref | ||
| Donkey/mule | 7/28 | 25.0 | 7.9–42.1 | 0.85 | 0.34–2.12 | 0.73 |
| Total | 61/220 | 27.7 | 21.8–33.7 | |||
Abbreviations: Ref, reference; 95% CI, confidence interval
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Results of the multivariate logistic analysis of risk factors for predicting T. equi infection in Jilin, China
| Variable | Category | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | All other regions | a | ||
| Baicheng | 0.006 | 3.452 | 1.414–8.424 | |
| Management | Unorganized | a | ||
| Organized | 0.020 | 0.456 | 0.235–0.886 | |
| Sex | Male | a | ||
| Female | 0.012 | 2.924 | 1.269–6.737 |
Abbreviations: a, baseline; 95% CI, confidence interval