Simon B Goldberg1, Kevin M Riordan2, Shufang Sun3, David J Kearney4, Tracy L Simpson4. 1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States. Electronic address: sbgoldberg@wisc.edu. 2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States. 3. Brown University, United States. 4. VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Military veterans report high rates of psychiatric and physical health symptoms that may be amenable to mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). Inconsistent prior findings and questions of fit between MBIs and military culture highlight the need for a systematic evaluation of this literature. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the efficacy and acceptability of MBIs for military veterans. DATA SOURCES: We searched five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) from inception to October 16th, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing MBIs in military veterans. RESULTS: Twenty studies (k = 16 unique comparisons, N = 898) were included. At post-treatment, MBIs were superior to non-specific controls (e.g., waitlist, attentional placebos) on measures of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, general psychological symptoms (i.e., aggregated across symptom domains), quality of life / functioning, and mindfulness (Hedges' gs = 0.32 to 0.80), but not physical health. At follow-up (mean length = 3.19 months), MBIs continued to outperform non-specific controls on general psychological symptoms, but not PTSD. MBIs were superior to specific active controls (i.e., other therapies) at post-treatment on measures of PTSD and general psychological symptoms (gs = 0.19 to 0.25). Participants randomized to MBIs showed higher rates of attrition than those randomized to control interventions (odds ratio = 1.98). Several models were not robust to tests of publication bias. Study quality and risk of bias assessment indicated several areas of concern. CONCLUSIONS: MBIs may improve psychological symptoms and quality of life / functioning in veterans. Questionable acceptability and few high-quality studies support the need for rigorous RCTs, potentially adapted to veterans.
BACKGROUND: Military veterans report high rates of psychiatric and physical health symptoms that may be amenable to mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). Inconsistent prior findings and questions of fit between MBIs and military culture highlight the need for a systematic evaluation of this literature. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the efficacy and acceptability of MBIs for military veterans. DATA SOURCES: We searched five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) from inception to October 16th, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing MBIs in military veterans. RESULTS: Twenty studies (k = 16 unique comparisons, N = 898) were included. At post-treatment, MBIs were superior to non-specific controls (e.g., waitlist, attentional placebos) on measures of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, general psychological symptoms (i.e., aggregated across symptom domains), quality of life / functioning, and mindfulness (Hedges' gs = 0.32 to 0.80), but not physical health. At follow-up (mean length = 3.19 months), MBIs continued to outperform non-specific controls on general psychological symptoms, but not PTSD. MBIs were superior to specific active controls (i.e., other therapies) at post-treatment on measures of PTSD and general psychological symptoms (gs = 0.19 to 0.25). Participants randomized to MBIs showed higher rates of attrition than those randomized to control interventions (odds ratio = 1.98). Several models were not robust to tests of publication bias. Study quality and risk of bias assessment indicated several areas of concern. CONCLUSIONS: MBIs may improve psychological symptoms and quality of life / functioning in veterans. Questionable acceptability and few high-quality studies support the need for rigorous RCTs, potentially adapted to veterans.
Authors: Craig J Bryan; James E Griffith; Brian T Pace; Kent Hinkson; AnnaBelle O Bryan; Tracy A Clemans; Zac E Imel Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2015-04-08
Authors: Eve-Ling Khoo; Rebecca Small; Wei Cheng; Taylor Hatchard; Brittany Glynn; Danielle B Rice; Becky Skidmore; Samantha Kenny; Brian Hutton; Patricia A Poulin Journal: Evid Based Ment Health Date: 2019-02
Authors: Jeffrey F Scherrer; Timothy Chrusciel; Angelique Zeringue; Lauren D Garfield; Paul J Hauptman; Patrick J Lustman; Kenneth E Freedland; Robert M Carney; Kathleen K Bucholz; Richard Owen; William R True Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Anthony P King; Stefanie R Block; Rebecca K Sripada; Sheila Rauch; Nicholas Giardino; Todd Favorite; Michael Angstadt; Daniel Kessler; Robert Welsh; Israel Liberzon Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Michelle E Martinez; David J Kearney; Tracy Simpson; Benjamin I Felleman; Nicole Bernardi; George Sayre Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 2.579