Literature DB >> 32905815

Effect of tool-use observation on metric body representation and peripersonal space.

M Galigani1, N Castellani1, B Donno2, M Franza3, C Zuber4, L Allet5, F Garbarini1, M Bassolino6.   

Abstract

In everyday life, we constantly act and interact with objects and with others' people through our body. To properly perform actions, the representations of the dimension of body-parts (metric body representation, BR) and of the space surrounding the body (peripersonal space, PPS) need to be constantly updated. Previous evidence has shown that BR and PPS representation are highly flexible, being modulated by sensorimotor experiences, such as the active use of tools to reach objects in the far space. In this study, we investigate whether the observation of another person using a tool to interact with objects located in the far space is sufficient to influence the plasticity of BR and PPS representation in a similar way to active tool-use. With this aim, two groups of young healthy participants were asked to perform 20 min trainings based on the active use of a tool to retrieve far cubes (active tool-use) and on the first-person observation of an experimenter doing the same tool-use training (observational tool-use). Behavioural tasks adapted from literature were used to evaluate the effects of the active and observational tool-use on BR (body-landmarks localization task-group 1), and PPS (audio-tactile interaction task - group 2). Results show that after active tool-use, participants perceived the length of their arm as longer than at baseline, while no significant differences appear after observation. Similarly, significant modifications in PPS representation, with comparable multisensory facilitation on tactile responses due to near and far sounds, were seen only after active tool-use, while this did not occur after observation. Together these results suggest that a mere observational training could not be sufficient to significantly modulate BR or PPS. The dissociation found in the active and observational tool-use points out differences between action execution and action observation, by suggesting a fundamental role of the motor planning, the motor intention, and the related sensorimotor feedback in driving BR and PPS plasticity.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Body representation; Motor intention; Peripersonal space; Tool-use

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32905815     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

Review 1.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Tool-use Extends Peripersonal Space Boundaries in Schizophrenic Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Ferroni; Martina Ardizzi; Francesca Magnani; Francesca Ferri; Nunzio Langiulli; Francesca Rastelli; Valeria Lucarini; Francesca Giustozzi; Roberto Volpe; Carlo Marchesi; Matteo Tonna; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

3.  Body and peripersonal space representations in chronic stroke patients with upper limb motor deficits.

Authors:  Michela Bassolino; Matteo Franza; Eleonora Guanziroli; Giuliana Sorrentino; Elisa Canzoneri; Maria Colombo; Andrea Crema; Tommaso Bertoni; Giulio Mastria; Matteo Vissani; Arseny A Sokolov; Silvestro Micera; Franco Molteni; Olaf Blanke; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-08-05

4.  Assess and rehabilitate body representations via (neuro)robotics: An emergent perspective.

Authors:  Gaia Risso; Michela Bassolino
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.493

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.