Lisa M Smith1,2, Vida L Hodara1, Laura M Parodi1, Jessica E Callery1, Luis D Giavedoni1. 1. Host-Pathogen Interactions Program, Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One approach for a functional HIV cure is to prevent transcription from integrated proviral DNA. A critical step in HIV transcription is the Tat protein interaction with the TAR element viral RNA. We tested the strategy of blocking this Tat-TAR interaction in the SIVmac model. METHODS: We designed five CRISPR short guiding RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting the SIVmac TAR element, along with inactive versions of Cas9 (dCas9). These sgRNA constructs were delivered as ribonucleoproteins or plasmid DNA, along with SIV DNA. The constructs were also tested in integrated viral DNA in a cell line chronically infected by SIV. RESULTS: The sgRNAs targeting the coding strand of the TAR element inhibited SIV RNA transcription in association with dCas9-KRAB, but not with dCas9. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of epigenetic modifications may be more effective in inactivating provirus than transcriptional interference and thus may be a better strategy to achieve a functional cure in vivo.
BACKGROUND: One approach for a functional HIV cure is to prevent transcription from integrated proviral DNA. A critical step in HIV transcription is the Tat protein interaction with the TAR element viral RNA. We tested the strategy of blocking this Tat-TAR interaction in the SIVmac model. METHODS: We designed five CRISPR short guiding RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting the SIVmacTAR element, along with inactive versions of Cas9 (dCas9). These sgRNA constructs were delivered as ribonucleoproteins or plasmid DNA, along with SIV DNA. The constructs were also tested in integrated viral DNA in a cell line chronically infected by SIV. RESULTS: The sgRNAs targeting the coding strand of the TAR element inhibited SIV RNA transcription in association with dCas9-KRAB, but not with dCas9. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of epigenetic modifications may be more effective in inactivating provirus than transcriptional interference and thus may be a better strategy to achieve a functional cure in vivo.
Authors: Will Fischer; Cristian Apetrei; Mario L Santiago; Yingying Li; Rajeev Gautam; Ivona Pandrea; George M Shaw; Beatrice H Hahn; Norman L Letvin; Gary J Nabel; Bette T Korber Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Jason Wright; Vineeta Agarwala; David A Scott; Feng Zhang Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Luke A Gilbert; Matthew H Larson; Leonardo Morsut; Zairan Liu; Gloria A Brar; Sandra E Torres; Noam Stern-Ginossar; Onn Brandman; Evan H Whitehead; Jennifer A Doudna; Wendell A Lim; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi Journal: Cell Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Matthew H Larson; Luke A Gilbert; Xiaowo Wang; Wendell A Lim; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Nan Cher Yeo; Alejandro Chavez; Alissa Lance-Byrne; Yingleong Chan; David Menn; Denitsa Milanova; Chih-Chung Kuo; Xiaoge Guo; Sumana Sharma; Angela Tung; Ryan J Cecchi; Marcelle Tuttle; Swechchha Pradhan; Elaine T Lim; Noah Davidsohn; Mo R Ebrahimkhani; James J Collins; Nathan E Lewis; Samira Kiani; George M Church Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Lisa M Smith; Jason T Ladner; Vida L Hodara; Laura M Parodi; R Alan Harris; Jessica E Callery; Zhao Lai; Yi Zou; Muthuswamy Raveedran; Jeffrey Rogers; Luis D Giavedoni Journal: J Virol Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 5.103