| Literature DB >> 32904719 |
Kenichiro Sato1, Tatsuo Mano1, Kazushi Suzuki2, Tatsushi Toda1, Takeshi Iwatsubo3, Atsushi Iwata1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although aging is the strongest risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD), it remains uncertain if the blood DNA methylation clock, which reflects the effect of biological aging on DNA methylation (DNAme) status of blood cells, may be used as a surrogate biomarker for AD pathology in the central nervous system (CNS).Entities:
Keywords: A/T/N; Alzheimer’s disease; DNA methylation; blood biomarker; epigenetic clock
Year: 2020 PMID: 32904719 PMCID: PMC7458568 DOI: 10.3233/ADR-200205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Rep ISSN: 2542-4823
Fig. 1Data processing flow for model training and evaluation. The entire data are randomly split into training and test subsets at a ratio of 1 : 1. Models A1–B2 were trained based on the different combination of features (‘age’ refers to the chronological age), where model A2 included features from model A1 in addition to the AgingAcc, model B1 included features form model A1 in addition to the APOE, and model B2 included features from model A1 in addition to the APOE and AgingAcc. The performance of these models was evaluated in the test subset. Performance AUC was compared between models A1 and A2, and between models B1 and B2, using DeLong’s test. The whole procedure was repeated 20 times. AUC, area under curve; AgingAcc, aging acceleration calculated based on the methylation clock and the actual chronological age.
Fig. 2Degree of AUC performance improvement by incorporating aging acceleration. To measure the usefulness of aging acceleration, we evaluated the AUC between models with different combination of features (model A1–B2). Panels A and D show the AUC results by 20 times of repeated trials predicting for A+ when IEAA (in A) or EEAA (in D) is included as epigenetic aging. Similarly, panels B and E show the AUC results predicting for T+ when IEAA (in B) or EEAA (in E) is included as epigenetic aging. And panels C and F show the AUC results predicting for N+ when IEAA (in C) or EEAA (in F) is included as epigenetic aging. The AUC results were compared between model A versus B and between model C versus D in panels A–F: significantly high AUC for A+ or T+ or N+ was not observed in any model pairs compared (as denoted by ‘FDR < 0.05 in 0/20’ in figures), across 20 times of randomization trials. In the box plot, upper and lower whiskers correspond to the maximum and minimum range, and the range of box corresponds to the interquartile range. Y-axis corresponds to the value of AUC. AUC, area under curve; AgingAcc, aging acceleration calculated based on the methylation clock and the actual chronological age; IEAA, intrinsic epigenetic aging acceleration; EEAA, extrinsic epigenetic aging acceleration; FDR, false-discovery rate.