| Literature DB >> 32904547 |
Haijun Yang1, Ping Zhang1, Junkuo Li1, Yang Gao2, Luyao Zhao2, Jia Li1, Mei Guo1, Jingfang Zhang1, Haimei Li1, Fuqiang Wang1, Yufen Yuan1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly heterogeneous type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with many molecular subtypes that can be distinguished by gene expression profiling (GEP). However, the pathogenesis of DLBCL is still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: DLBCL; PI3K/AKT signaling pathway; PIN-1
Year: 2020 PMID: 32904547 PMCID: PMC7457679 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S247429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1PIN-1 expression is enhanced in the GCB subtype of DLBCL. (A) Representative images of IHC showing PIN-1 expression in the GCB (upper) and non-GCB (lower) subtypes of DLBCL (scale bar = 200 μm). (B) PIN-1 protein levels in a panel of lymphoma tissues of the GCB (right) and non-GCB (left) DLBCL subtypes were measured by WB. Shown are representative immunoblots from 3 assays. (C) PIN-1 staining was more intense in GCB (n = 35) than in non-GCB DLBCL samples, as shown by IHC (n = 38) (P < 0.001).
Figure 2PIN-1 depletion inhibits the proliferation of GCB DLBCL cells. (A) PIN-1 was silenced in BJAB cells by two independent shRNAs, and the expression of PIN-1 in shCTRL- and shPIN-1/2-transfected BJAB cells was detected by WB. Shown are representative immunoblots from 3 assays. (B) Growth curves of shCTRL- and shPIN-1/2-transfected BJAB cells. At different time points, the cells were counted using a Coulter counter. (C) PIN-1 was silenced in HBL-1 cells with two independent shRNAs, and PIN-1 expression in shCTRL- and shPIN-1/2-transfected HBL-1 cells was detected by WB. Shown are representative immunoblots from 3 assays. (D) Growth curves of shCTRL- and shPIN-1/2-treated HBL-1 cells. At different time points, the cells were counted using a Coulter counter. (E) Effects of PIN-1 depletion on the cell cycle of BJAB cells. shCTRL- and shPIN-1-transfected BJAB cells were cultured for 24 hours and then subjected to FACS analysis. (F) PIN-1 depletion increased apoptosis in primary GCB DLBCL cells. Cells were stained with annexin V-FITC and PI and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentages of cells that stained positive for annexin V are plotted. For all panels, the data are presented as the means ± SEMs from 3 assays. Statistical significance among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA; **P < 0.01.
Figure 3PIN-1 is positively correlated with PI3K/AKT activation. (A) GSEA of the RNA-seq data for the “PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling” gene modules in patients with lymphoma expressing high versus low levels of PIN-1. FDR q, false discovery rate q value; NES, normalized enrichment score. (B) p-AKT and PIN-1 protein levels in 16 fresh human primary GCB lymphoma specimens were measured by WB. (C and D) Representative IHC images and the correlation between p-AKT and PIN-1 in human primary GCB lymphoma tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. Each data point represents the value from an individual patient. Statistical significance was measured by Pearson’s correlation test.
Figure 4PIN-1 depletion downregulates p-AKT expression, and pharmacologic PI3K inhibition results in selective toxic effects on GCB DLBCL cells. (A) Immunoblot assays for the indicated proteins in BJAB cells with PIN-1 knockdown. PIN-1 depletion decreased the phosphorylation of AKT. Shown are representative blots from 3 assays. (B) BJAB cells were treated with ATRA at the indicated concentration for 24 hours. The indicated proteins were detected by immunoblotting. Shown are representative blots from 3 assays. ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid. (C) Effects of the pan-PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (5 mM) on the BJAB cell growth rate, as measured by CCK-8 proliferation assay. At different time points, the cells were counted using a Coulter counter. (D) Effects of the pan-PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (5 mM) on the HBL-1 cell growth rate, as measured by CCK-8 proliferation assay. At different time points, the cells were counted using a Coulter counter. The data in all panels are the means ± SEMs for 3 assays. The statistical significance of differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA.