| Literature DB >> 32903241 |
Wei Han1,2, Junjie Liu3, Zhijie Liu1, Xiaodong Zhu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We used echo-tracking (ET) technique to observe short-term dynamic changes of the carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-one NPC patients received IMRT. In the irradiation group, the carotid artery was examined by ultrasonography before radiotherapy, at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the start of radiotherapy, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. In the control group, the carotid artery was examined by ultrasonography before radiotherapy of patients in the irradiation group, and at 3 and 6 months after the end of radiotherapy of patients in the irradiation group. RESULTS During radiotherapy for the 61 patients, the maximum dose on the carotid artery was 65.14±4.35 Gy, the average dose was 57.46±4.12 Gy, and the 50% volume dose was 51.80±5.32 Gy. At the end of irradiation, Ep (kPa) and ß values were significantly different from those before treatment. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that the elastic function of the carotid artery can be significantly affected when the irradiation dose exceeds 45 Gy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32903241 PMCID: PMC7501737 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.926260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Changes in conventional ultrasound values during radiotherapy.
| Time (week) | IMT (mm) | RI | PI | S/D | Ds (mm) | Dd (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.69±0.13 | 0.67±0.11 | 1.36±0.23 | 3.59±0.62 | 7.48±1.03 | 7.03±0.68 |
| 2 | 0.68±0.15 | 0.70±0.12 | 1.36±0.24 | 3.64±0.58 | 7.46±0.85 | 7.06±0.75 |
| 4 | 0.71±0.11 | 0.70±0.05 | 1.38±0.18 | 3.62±0.64 | 7.50±0.76 | 7.05±0.53 |
| 6 | 0.73±0.15 | 0.71±0.07 | 1.40±0.21 | 3.61±0.39 | 7.49±1.14 | 7.08±1.06 |
| 18 | 0.77±0.128 | 0.72±0.13 | 1.41±0.16 | 3.62±0.44 | 7.54±0.87 | 7.11±0.85 |
| 30 | 0.89±0.20 | 0.75±0.12 | 1.43±0.24 | 3.64±0.51 | 7.56±0.95 | 7.12±0.74 |
IMT – arterial intima-media thickness; RI – resistance index; PI – pulsatility index; S/D – systolic diastolic ratio; Ds – systolic inner diameter; Dd – diastolic inner diameter.
Significant difference compared with that before radiotherapy
Comparison of conventional ultrasound results between 18-week radiotherapy and 30-week radiotherapy.
| Group | IMT (mm) | RI | PI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 weeks | 30 weeks | 18 weeks | 30 weeks | 18 weeks | 30 weeks | |
| Irradiation (n=61) | 0.77±0.12 | 0.89±0.20 | 0.72±0.13 | 0.75±0.12 | 1.41±0.16 | 1.43±0.24 |
| Control (n=10) | 0.72±0.16 | 0.71±0.14 | 0.71±0.13 | 0.72±0.08 | 1.38±0.15 | 1.39±0.21 |
| t | 1.164 | 2.732 | 0.225 | 0.966 | 0.554 | 0.636 |
| P | 0.124 | 0.004 | 0.411 | 0.169 | 0.291 | 0.263 |
IMT – arterial intima-media thickness; RI – resistance index; PI – pulsatility index.
Figure 1Dynamic changes in IMT after irradiation.
Changes of ET ultrasound values during radiotherapy.
| Time (week) | Ep (kPa) | β | AC (mm2/kPa) | PWV-β (m/s) | AI (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 0 weeks | 86.37±13.29 | 7.46±1.25 | 0.84±0.13 | 5.70±0.19 | 7.38±3.48 |
| 18 weeks | 88.18±16.05 | 7.85±1.23 | 0.86±0.27 | 5.68±0.31 | 8.22±2.26 | |
| 30 weeks | 85.96±10.13 | 7.66±1.76 | 0.85±0.12 | 5.65±0.22 | 7.61±5.17 | |
| Irradiation group | 0 weeks | 85.76±12.23 | 7.65±1.26 | 0.87±0.21 | 5.63±1.32 | 7.45±5.22 |
| 2 weeks | 87.35±11.46 | 7.83±1.47 | 0.85±0.18 | 5.68±1.30 | 8.28±4.16 | |
| 4 weeks | 88.25±20.34 | 8.04±1.49 | 0.82±0.16 | 5.75±1.22 | 7.82±3.41 | |
| 6 weeks | 95.36±22.19 | 8.49±1.62 | 0.81±0.22 | 5.83±1.31 | 7.48±5.33 | |
| 18 weeks | 107.24±16.57 | 10.03±2.17 | 0.62±0.24 | 6.58±2.50 | 9.16±4.01 | |
| 30 weeks | 136.37±21.08 | 13.49±1.94 | 0.50±0.21 | 7.34±2.43 | 9.57±4.36 | |
Significant difference compared with that of irradiation group before radiotherapy;
significant difference compared with that of control group at 18th;
significant difference compared with that of control group at 30th.
Figure 2Detection interface (A), endocardial interface (B), and ET elastic curve (C).
Figure 3Changes in Ep (kPa) and β with dose (Dmean) increasing.