Literature DB >> 32902762

Single-incision slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up.

Matteo Frigerio1, Rodolfo Milani1, Marta Barba2, Luca Locatelli2, Giuseppe Marino2, Gianluca Donatiello2, Federico Spelzini3, Stefano Manodoro4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Single-incision slings are not considered a first-choice surgical treatment owing to a lack of data about long-term outcomes. We aimed to assess the long-term results of urinary incontinence treatment after single-incision sling implantation at 10 years' follow-up and to investigate possible deterioration over time.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed women with subjective and urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence who underwent single-incision sling procedure. The objective cure rate was assessed with a 300-ml stress test. The subjective cure rate was determined by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) questionnaire scores and self-answered patient-satisfaction scales were collected to assess symptom severity. Findings were compared with short-term outcomes in the same patients, available through our previous database, in order to detect possible outcome deterioration over time.
RESULTS: The records of 60 patients were analyzed. Nine patients (15%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 51 patients completed the evaluation, with a mean follow-up of 10.3 ± 0.7 years. Objective and subjective cure resulted 86.3% and 88.2% respectively. Mean PGI-I scores and ICIQ-SF were 1.5 ± 1.0 and 3.2 ± 4.8 respectively. Patients' satisfaction scored 8.6 ± 2.6 out of 10. No long-term complications occurred. Comparison of short-term (2.6 ± 1.4 years after surgery) and long-term follow-up did not show a significant deterioration of outcome over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision slings were shown to be a procedure with a great efficacy and safety profile at very long-term follow-up. Cure rates and functional outcomes did not show any deterioration over time compared with short-term results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Functional outcomes; Long-term follow-up; Quality of life; Single-incision sling; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32902762     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04499-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  9 in total

Review 1.  Changing trends in surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Geller; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 2.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Joseph A Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

3.  Five-Year Outcome of MiniArc Single-Incision Sling Used in the Treatment of Primary Urodynamic Stress Incontinence.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Sandy Chua; Chuan Chi Kao; Ma Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio; Rami Ibrahim; Yiap Loong Tan
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Mini-sling efficacy in obese versus non-obese patients for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Matteo Frigerio; Cristina Regini; Stefano Manodoro; Federico Spelzini; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2017-06-09

5.  Treatment options for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Eric S Rovner; Alan J Wein
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

6.  [TVT SECUR System--tension-free support of the urethra in women suffering from stress urinary incontinence--technique and initial experience].

Authors:  A Martan; J Masata; K Svabík
Journal:  Ceska Gynekol       Date:  2007-01

7.  [Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women].

Authors:  E Delorme
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 8.  Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard?

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn; Livia Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs MiniArc): A 3-year post-operative review.

Authors:  Tsia-Shu Lo; Sandy Chua; Yiap Loong Tan; Ma Clarissa Patrimonio; Leng Boi Pue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Response to a letter to the editor: "Single-incision slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow up".

Authors:  Matteo Frigerio; Rodolfo Milani; Marta Barba; Luca Locatelli; Giuseppe Marino; Federico Spelzini; Gianluca Donatiello; Stefano Manodoro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Letter to the editor: Single-incision slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Lin; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Stem Cells in Clinical Trials for Pelvic Floor Disorders: a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Stefano Manodoro; Matteo Frigerio; Marta Barba; Sara Bosio; Luigi Antonio de Vitis; Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.