Literature DB >> 32902731

Validation of the Japanese version of the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale for CRPS.

Akira Mibu1,2, Tomohiko Nishigami3, Hironobu Uematsu4,5, Katsuyoshi Tanaka6, Masahiko Shibata7, Yoichi Matsuda4,5, Yuji Fujino5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Body perception disturbance is a common symptom and may be one of the key targets of treatment intervention in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a comprehensive assessment tool of body perception in patients with CRPS, the Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale (BPDS) was developed, and its adequate reliability and validity have been reported. However, there is no available Japanese version. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a Japanese version of BPDS (BPDS-J) and to investigate the validity of this scale in Japanese patients with CRPS.
METHODS: We developed BPDS-J using a forward-backward method. We then assessed 22 patients with CRPS type 1 of the upper limb using BPDS-J, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and a two-point discrimination threshold (TPD) on the middle finger. We investigated the internal consistency of BPDS-J and the correlation between BPDS-J and clinical outcomes as a concurrent validity measure.
RESULTS: BPDS-J had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73) and was significantly correlated with the TPD ratio (r = 0.65, adjusted p = 0.01) and TSK (r = 0.51, adjusted p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: BPDS-J has good internal consistency and concurrent validity for assessing body perception disturbance in Japanese patients with CRPS. Disturbed body perception may be worth evaluating when managing patients with CRPS using BPDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body perception disturbance; Complex regional pain syndrome; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32902731     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02853-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Two-point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation, e.g. in tetraplegia.

Authors:  E Moberg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; K M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 3.  Neurocognitive and Neuroplastic Mechanisms of Novel Clinical Signs in CRPS.

Authors:  Anoop Kuttikat; Valdas Noreika; Nicholas Shenker; Srivas Chennu; Tristan Bekinschtein; Christopher Andrew Brown
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II.

Authors:  Keith M Smart; Benedict M Wand; Neil E O'Connell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-24

5.  Validation of the Japanese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Tanaka; Tomohiko Nishigami; Akira Mibu; Masahiro Manfuku; Satoko Yono; Yoshikazu Shinohara; Akihito Tanabe; Rei Ono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complex regional pain syndrome-up-to-date.

Authors:  Frank Birklein; Violeta Dimova
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-10-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.