Literature DB >> 32901567

Artificial Intelligence Predictive Analytics in the Management of Outpatient MRI Appointment No-Shows.

Le Roy Chong1, Koh Tzan Tsai1, Lee Lian Lee1, Seck Guan Foo1, Piek Chim Chang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Outpatient appointment no-shows are a common problem. Artificial intelligence predictive analytics can potentially facilitate targeted interventions to improve efficiency. We describe a quality improvement project that uses machine learning techniques to predict and reduce outpatient MRI appointment no-shows. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Anonymized records from 32,957 outpatient MRI appointments between 2016 and 2018 were acquired for model training and validation along with a holdout test set of 1080 records from January 2019. The overall no-show rate was 17.4%. A predictive model developed with XGBoost, a decision tree-based ensemble machine learning algorithm that uses a gradient boosting framework, was deployed after various machine learning algorithms were evaluated. The simple intervention measure of using telephone call reminders for patients with the top 25% highest risk of an appointment no-show as predicted by the model was implemented over 6 months. RESULTS. The ROC AUC for the predictive model was 0.746 with an optimized F1 score of 0.708; at this threshold, the precision and recall were 0.606 and 0.852, respectively. The AUC for the holdout test set was 0.738 with an optimized F1 score of 0.721; at this threshold, the precision and recall were 0.605 and 0.893, respectively. The no-show rate 6 months after deployment of the predictive model was 15.9% compared with 19.3% in the preceding 12-month preintervention period, corresponding to a 17.2% improvement from the baseline no-show rate (p < 0.0001). The no-show rates of contactable and noncontactable patients in the group at high risk of appointment no-shows as predicted by the model were 17.5% and 40.3%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Machine learning predictive analytics perform moderately well in predicting complex problems involving human behavior using a modest amount of data with basic feature engineering, and they can be incorporated into routine workflow to improve health care delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; XGBoost; artificial intelligence; machine learning; no-show

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32901567     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.

Authors:  Brian J Douthit; Rachel L Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia P Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Theresa A Kapetanovic; Mikyoung A Lee; Lisiane Pruinelli; Mary A Schultz; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

3.  Determinants of Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis Support System Among Prospective Physicians.

Authors:  Anh Quynh Tran; Long Hoang Nguyen; Hao Si Anh Nguyen; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Linh Gia Vu; Melvyn Zhang; Thuc Minh Thi Vu; Son Hoang Nguyen; Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Roger C M Ho; Cyrus S H Ho
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 4.  How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?

Authors:  Kicky G van Leeuwen; Maarten de Rooij; Steven Schalekamp; Bram van Ginneken; Matthieu J C M Rutten
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.