Neil Thayamballi1,2, Sara Habiba1,2, Ouahiba Laribi1, Keita Ebisu3. 1. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, 1515 Clay Street, 16th floor, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. 2. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Room 5302, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7360, USA. 3. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, 1515 Clay Street, 16th floor, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. keita.ebisu@oehha.ca.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies conducted in the United States found associations between prenatal exposure to particulate matter (PM) and adverse birth outcomes, and some studies identified vulnerable populations, including certain racial/ethnic groups and people with low-socioeconomic status. However, their findings are not always consistent. In this review, we compared the risk of adverse birth outcomes due to PM exposures among subpopulations and investigated whether any particular population is more vulnerable. METHODS: We selected U.S. studies examining associations between PM exposure during pregnancy and birth outcomes that included results for effect modification by race/ethnicity and/or maternal education. We summarized the findings for various sizes of PM and birth outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted to quantify vulnerable race/ethnicity for the association between fine PM (PM2.5) and birthweight. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies were assessed, and PM-related risks of adverse birth outcomes, particularly those related to fetal growth, likely differ across subpopulations. A meta-analysis from five studies showed that a 10 μg/m3 increase of PM2.5 during the full-gestation reduced birthweight by 21.9 g (95% confidence interval 11.7, 32.0), 15.7 g (10.1, 21.4), 9.3 g (2.7, 15.8), and 5.8 g (- 9.0, 20.7) for Black, White, Hispanic, and Asian mothers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our review indicated that Black mothers and mothers with low educational attainment are more vulnerable subpopulations. More investigation is needed for effect modification by other maternal factors, such as household income. Characterizing and quantifying vulnerable subpopulations are essential for addressing environmental justice since it can help regulatory agencies allocate resources and design policy interventions.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies conducted in the United States found associations between prenatal exposure to particulate matter (PM) and adverse birth outcomes, and some studies identified vulnerable populations, including certain racial/ethnic groups and people with low-socioeconomic status. However, their findings are not always consistent. In this review, we compared the risk of adverse birth outcomes due to PM exposures among subpopulations and investigated whether any particular population is more vulnerable. METHODS: We selected U.S. studies examining associations between PM exposure during pregnancy and birth outcomes that included results for effect modification by race/ethnicity and/or maternal education. We summarized the findings for various sizes of PM and birth outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted to quantify vulnerable race/ethnicity for the association between fine PM (PM2.5) and birthweight. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies were assessed, and PM-related risks of adverse birth outcomes, particularly those related to fetal growth, likely differ across subpopulations. A meta-analysis from five studies showed that a 10 μg/m3 increase of PM2.5 during the full-gestation reduced birthweight by 21.9 g (95% confidence interval 11.7, 32.0), 15.7 g (10.1, 21.4), 9.3 g (2.7, 15.8), and 5.8 g (- 9.0, 20.7) for Black, White, Hispanic, and Asian mothers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our review indicated that Black mothers and mothers with low educational attainment are more vulnerable subpopulations. More investigation is needed for effect modification by other maternal factors, such as household income. Characterizing and quantifying vulnerable subpopulations are essential for addressing environmental justice since it can help regulatory agencies allocate resources and design policy interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Birth outcome; Environmental justice; Particulate matter; Vulnerable population
Authors: Hien Q Le; Stuart A Batterman; Julia J Wirth; Robert L Wahl; Katherine J Hoggatt; Alireza Sadeghnejad; Mary Lee Hultin; Michael Depa Journal: Environ Int Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Connie Ng; Brian Malig; Sina Hasheminassab; Constantinos Sioutas; Rupa Basu; Keita Ebisu Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Mariam S Girguis; Matthew J Strickland; Xuefei Hu; Yang Liu; Scott M Bartell; Verónica M Vieira Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Lyndsey A Darrow; Mitchel Klein; Matthew J Strickland; James A Mulholland; Paige E Tolbert Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Emily DeFranco; Eric Hall; Monir Hossain; Aimin Chen; Erin N Haynes; David Jones; Sheng Ren; Long Lu; Louis Muglia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hua Hao; Howard H Chang; Heather A Holmes; James A Mulholland; Mitch Klein; Lyndsey A Darrow; Matthew J Strickland Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Maayan Yitshak-Sade; Itai Kloog; Joel D Schwartz; Victor Novack; Offer Erez; Allan C Just Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 13.352
Authors: Bingkui Qiu; Min Zhou; Yang Qiu; Yuxiang Ma; Chaonan Ma; Jiating Tu; Siqi Li Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yile Chen; Bing He; Yu Liu; Max T Aung; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker; Lana X Garmire Journal: Gigascience Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 6.524