Literature DB >> 32901243

Bleaching sensitivity with a desensitizing in-office bleaching gel: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Bianca Medeiros Maran, Laína Vochikovski, Diego Rafael de Andrade Hortkoff, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Alessandro D Loguercio, Alessandra Reis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This split-mouth study assessed the bleaching sensitivity (risk and intensity) and color change after in-office bleaching using a desensitizing-containing (5% potassium nitrate) and a desensitizing-free 35% hydrogen peroxide gel. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences between study groups regarding bleaching sensitivity. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Sixty patients participated in this split-mouth study. The subjects received desensitizing-containing hydrogen peroxide in half of the maxillary arch, and the other half received a desensitizing-free hydrogen peroxide, defined by random sequence, in two dental bleaching sessions. The bleaching sensitivity was evaluated during bleaching and from 1 h to 48 h after each bleaching session using a visual analog scale and numeric rating scale; the McNemar test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used for statistical analysis. The color was measured at baseline and 30 days post-bleaching, evaluated with paired t tests (P = .05).
RESULTS: Statistically similar risks of bleaching sensitivity were observed (P = 1.000), but the intensity of bleaching sensitivity was lower (P < .011) on average by 1.32 visual analog scale units in the group bleached with the desensitizer-containing gel during up to 24 h assessment times. No statistical difference in color change was observed between groups (P > .321).
CONCLUSION: The incorporation of 5% potassium nitrate into in-office bleaching gels does not reduce the risk of bleaching sensitivity, but it reduces its intensity slightly without jeopardizing color change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dentin sensitivity; hydrogen peroxide; randomized controlled trial; tooth bleaching agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32901243     DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a45173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  3 in total

1.  Topical application of Otosporin® before in-office bleaching: a split mouth, triple-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Willian Favoreto; Laína Vochikovski; Renata Maria Oleniki Terra; Veridiana Silva Campos; Mariana Evangelista Santos; Sônia Saeger Meireles; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Is the at-home bleaching treatment applied only on the lingual surface as effective as that on the buccal surface? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Luciana Mendonça Silva; Ítalo Augusto da Costa Lacerda; Daniela Bandeira Dos Santos; Fernando José Herkrath; Karine Letícia da Silva; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Leandro de Moura Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Efficacy and tooth sensitivity of at-home bleaching in patients with esthetic restorations: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sônia Saeger Meireles; Renata Dantas Barreto de Oliveira; Marcella Tuanny Guedes Barbosa; Karine Letícia da Silva; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.