Literature DB >> 32900666

Positive aspects, negative aspects and limitations of plasma therapy with special reference to COVID-19.

Basavraj Nagoba1, Ajay Gavkare2, Nawab Jamadar2, Sachin Mumbre3, Sohan Selkar4.   

Abstract

The principle of plasma therapy can be used for prophylaxis and treatment purpose. In view of non-availability of suitable vaccine for prevention or no established definitive therapy for SARS-CoV-2, plasma therapy is gaining importance in a current pandemic as one of the treatment options for the treatment of COVID-19. Although, it has been reported to be an effective approach in various preliminary studies, convalescent plasma (CP) therapy has several limitations. In this mini review, an attempt has been made to review positive aspects, negative aspects and various limitations of the CP therapy for COVID-19 cases. The results of various studies show that CP therapy may be thought of one of the alternatives but while considering it as a therapeutic approach, in light of beneficial effects, the negative aspects and limitations are to be taken into consideration before its administration as a therapeutic agent.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Convalescent plasma; Limitations; Negative aspects; Positive aspects

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900666      PMCID: PMC7462592          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Public Health        ISSN: 1876-0341            Impact factor:   3.718


Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 originated in China in December 2019 has now become a major concern all over the world. Till date, there is no suitable vaccine for prevention or no established definitive therapy for SARS-CoV-2 is available. In a battle against COVID-19, convalescent plasma (CP) obtained from recently recovered cases of COVID-19 cases is gaining attention as one of the treatment options. Human convalescent plasma administration has been reported to be effective in the management of COVID-19 cases in preliminary studies [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. Use of CP therapy is not new; it is known since long and was used for many viral (Varicella-zoster, hepatitis B, Rabies) and bacterial (tetanus, pertussis) diseases [6]. It was also used for SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2003 and was found effective when administered before 14 days following onset of symptoms as compared to when administered after 14 days. The mortality rate was also less in those who received CP therapy before 14 days [7]. It was also used for avian influenza (H5N1) virus in 2008 [8], (H1N1) virus in 2009 [9], Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2012 [10], Ebola virus outbreak in 2014 [11], etc. A recent study by Zhao et al. shows that there is dynamic increase in IgM and IgG antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection as the disease progresses with median seroconversion time of 11–15 days explaining the importance of serological testing in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients [12]. The CP rich in neutralizing antibodies obtained from donors who have recovered from recent viral infections has proved to be one of the safe, effective and reliable treatment options in the outbreak of these viral infections. Thus, it is a well established treatment modality to prevent disease in individuals who are exposed to the infective agent or at a risk of infection [[13], [14], [15], [16], [17]]. It has been found that the use of CP for management of severe H1N1 infection reduces hospital stay, ICU duration, mechanical ventilation and Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [9]. Although found effective, CP therapy has several limitations. In this mini review, an attempt has been made to review positive aspects, negative aspects and various limitations influencing the CP therapy in general and in the management of COVID-19 cases in particular.

Positive aspects of plasma therapy

Clinical efficiency

As far as the clinical efficiency of CP therapy is concerned, the results of preliminary studies are very promising. Shen et al. in their preliminary study on five critically ill COVID-19 cases with severe respiratory failure and receiving mechanical ventilation found that administration of CP containing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Abs) with titre more than 1:1000 and neutralizing Abs with titre more than 1:40, along with lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon between day 10 and 22 showed improvement after one week of CP therapy. Their patients showed increase in Ab titre, decrease in viral load, resolution of symptoms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other symptoms of COVID-19 [1]. In a study by Duan et al. recruiting 10 confirmed cases of COVID-19, administration of one dose of 200 ml of CP from recently recovered donors with the neutralizing Ab titres more than 1:640 along with antiviral agents showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms, decrease in viral load and laboratory values by day three of transfusion of CP. The viral RNA became undetectable in all 10 cases. All 10 patients under study showed reduction in pulmonary lesions on chest CT examination, and clinical improvement as well [2]. In a study by Zhang et al. on four critically ill patients, transfusion of 200–2400 ml of CP ranging from day 11 to 18 resulted in recovery of all four patients from COVID-19 approximately in one week to one month after transfusion of CP [3]. In another descriptive study by Ye et al. in six laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients, transfusion of convalescent plasma resulted in resolution of ground-glass opacities and consolidation in five patients and in one patient, it resulted in an elimination of the virus indicating that CP therapy is effective and specific for COVID-19 with no notable adverse effects [4]. Ahn et al. in their study on two confirmed cases of COVID-19 with symptoms of severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, infusion of 500 ml of CP in two divided doses resulted in a favorable outcome after the use of convalescent plasma along with systemic corticosteroids [5] (Table 1 and Fig. 1 ).
Table 1

Details of convalescent plasma therapy in patients with COVID-19.

AuthorCountryStudy designNo. of casesDose of CPOutcomesMortality
Shen et al. [1]ChinaCase Series5Two consecutive doses of 200–250 ml (Total 400 ml)Decrease in viral loads, increase in SARS-CoV-2–specific antibody titres, improvement of clinical statusNil
Duan et al. [2]ChinaClinical trial10One dose of 200 mlImprovement in clinical symptoms and radiological findings, decrease in viral loads, increase in Ab titresNil
Zhang et al. [3]ChinaCase Series4200–2400 mlClinical recovery of all patientsNil
Ye et al. [4]ChinaCase Series6Two consecutive doses of 200–250 mlDecrease in viral loads, increase in Ab titres, improvement in clinical symptoms and radiological abnormalitiesNil
Ahn et al. [5]South KoreaCase Report2Two consecutive doses of 250 ml (Total 500 ml)Decrease in viral loads, increase in Ab titres, improvement in clinical symptomsNil
Fig. 1

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma workflow for plasma collection and transfusion.

Details of convalescent plasma therapy in patients with COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma workflow for plasma collection and transfusion. The results of these studies show that administration of CP containing high level of Abs against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the early phase of disease significantly reduces the severity of infection and decreases mortality. The results further show that CP therapy is a simple and effective tool to offer immediate protection by providing passive immunity. It is a more promising treatment option for patients with early symptoms and to prevent disease in those who are exposed to infection [17]. As CP offers immediate protection, i.e. instant immunity with the help of Abs against SARS-CoV-2, it is very much beneficial in immunocompromised individuals [16]. Thus, CP therapy has the potential clinical benefit in the management of COVID -19 cases [[18], [19], [20], [21]]. There are two regions on SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, which are recognized by sera from COVID-19 convalescent patients. One of them is specific to SARS-CoV-2 and is located in close proximity to the receptor binding domain. The other region is located at the fusion peptide. These two regions are IgG immunodominant regions and spike binding antibodies targeting these regions significantly alter virus neutralisation capacities [22].

Zero percent mortality

Although, the mortality rates of 6.3% in patients receiving plasma therapy before 14 days and 21.9% in patients receiving plasma therapy after 14 days have been reported in patients suffering from SARS-CoV-1 infection [7], no mortality has been reported in the patients receiving CP therapy for SARS-CoV-2 infection in all five studies [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]] (Table 1).

Beneficial effects of other plasma components

Plasma is a mixture of organic compounds, inorganic salts and water. It has been shown to contain more than 1000 proteins including albumin, immunoglobulins, coagulation and antithrombotic factors, complement components, etc. [23]. These plasma components may exert beneficial effects, e.g. replenishing coagulation factors are useful in patients with hemorrhagic fevers as in ebola virus infection [24,25]. Plasma proteins, especially albumins contribute to maintain colloidal osmotic pressure of body fluid compartments. It has been also shown that plasma from healthy donors has immunomodulatory effects through anti-inflammatory cytokines and antibodies by blocking complement activation, inflammatory cytokines and autoantibodies [26].

Tolerance to CP therapy

As far as tolerance to CP therapy is concerned, the CP transfusion is well tolerated by all patients and could potentially improve the clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 cases although associated with some adverse effects [2,18].

Negative aspects of plasma therapy

Adverse reactions

Adverse reactions ranging from mild fever to allergic reactions to life–threatening bronchospasm, transfusion related acute lung injury and circulatory overload in patients with cardiorespiratory disorders, renal impairment and aged individuals have been reported [14,17,20,21,27]. Non infectious hazards of transfusions - like transfusion reactions such as transfusion related dyspnea and severe allergic reactions with associated bronchospasm, which can further exacerbate respiratory symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Transfusion - like reactions such as transient elevation of body temperature by 0.5 °C–1.5 °C within two hours of transfusion [14,18,28].

Immunological reactions

Administration of plasma may cause severe allergic reactions. Response to donor plasma/serum ingredients may lead to serum sickness and anaphylaxis. These reactions may be associated with bronchospasm [14,17,18,27].

Risk of transfusion associated infections

Although very rare, administration of CP carry the risk of transmission of potential pathogen, i.e. another infectious agents such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Treponema pallidum as well as SARS-CoV-2 itself. Hence, screening for presence of these pathogens is obligatory to avoid the risk of transfusion associated infections [14,18,21].

Risk of reinfection

Administration of CP, i.e. passive Abs may suppress/attenuate the humoral immune response of recipient thereby inhibiting the synthesis of specific Abs against SARS-CoV-2 (pathogen specific Abs). This may make an individual susceptible to reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 [17,18,29].

Other adverse reactions

CP therapy has been reported to cause an evanescent facial red spot in one patient under study [2]. Phlebitis and generalized jaundice have also been reported to occur in some patients [14].

Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE)

There is a remote possibility of antibody dependent enhancement of disease process. ADE is a process in which antibodies present in donor’s plasma may exacerbate disease by enhancing entry of virus into host cell and multiplication of virus [14,18].

Important limitations of plasma therapy

Although CP transfusion has been found effective in fighting severely infected cases of COVID-19, it is associated with several limitations. The important limitations of plasma therapy are as follows:

Lack of neutralizing antibodies in patient plasma

The patients recently recovered from the SARS-CoV-2 infection can be effective donors for preparation of plasma for treating COVID-19 cases. The most important requirement for this is that donor must have a high titre of neutralizing antibodies in their plasma. The studies show that not all patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection have desired levels of antibodies in a convalescent stage. Around 30% of patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2 produced very low titre of antibodies. Another problem is that these antibodies last only for a short duration which is to be measured in weeks or months [14,18,30,31].

Large infusion volumes

Another important limitation of CP therapy is the requirement of large infusion volumes. Different studies show that transfusion of 200 ml–2400 ml CP is required for treatment purpose [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. There is no standardization of transfusion dose of CP and different doses have been used in different studies. Depending on the patient, a dose of 200 ml–2400 ml was used by Zhang et al. [3]. However, Duan et al. infused one unit of 200 ml of CP [2] (Table 1).

Time of administration

Another important limitation is time of administrations of CP to infected patients. It is expected to be more effective, if administrated before the development of humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Hence, testing recipient (patient) for neutralizing antibodies would be beneficial in identifying the best recipient for treatment purpose [21].

Waning of plasma Abs

As mutations are common in SARS-CoV-2 there is a possibility of waning of plasma Abs [21].

Bridging the gap between COVID 19 positive and recovered cases

There is an addition of a large number of COVID 19 positive cases every day in almost all countries; however, the number of cases being recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection is comparatively very less. Hence, it is very difficult to meet the requirement of large quantity of plasma needed to treat large number of cases being added every day. The bridging of this gap between recovered cases and new cases appears to be very difficult, because of which this treatment option may not be feasible in terms of availability of large quantity of convalescent plasma.

Basic administrative and logistical barriers

The important barriers include identifying, consenting, collecting and testing donors. Identifying/finding donors with robust humoral response (donors with high levels of desired antibodies) is an important hurdle. Lack of suitable assay method for detection of neutralizing antibodies may hamper the identification of suitable/ideal donors. Written informed consent for donations of plasma by patients recently recovered from COVID-19 disease may be an another important hurdle [14,18] (Fig. 1).

Donors eligibility criteria

Donors consenting for donation of plasma must meet the eligibility criteria for standard blood donation. Donors must be negative for SARS-CoV-2 test and must be free from COVID-19 symptoms. Donor dependent variability in Abs specificities and titre of antibodies in CP is another problem associated with different individuals [18,21]. Donated plasma should be compatible with the A-B-O blood type of the recipient [14] (Fig. 1).

Conclusion

The review of various earlier studies show that CP therapy is beneficial in the management of various viral infections, including COVID-19. It may be thought of one of the alternatives, especially for the treatment of viral infections for which no suitable vaccine or established antiviral therapy is available. However, while considering it for therapeutic approach, in light of beneficial effects, the negative aspects and limitations are to be taken into consideration before its institution as a therapeutic agent.

Funding

No funding Sources.

Competing interests

None declared.

Ethical approval

Not required.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Noninfectious serious hazards of transfusion.

Authors:  Jeanne E Hendrickson; Christopher D Hillyer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Plasma components: properties, differences, and uses.

Authors:  Richard John Benjamin; Lisa Swinton McLaughlin
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology--mode of action and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Jan D Lünemann; Falk Nimmerjahn; Marinos C Dalakas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  First Ebola treatment is approved by WHO.

Authors:  Anne Gulland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-09-08

5.  [Epidemiologic features, clinical diagnosis and therapy of first cluster of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Beijing area].

Authors:  Xian-zhi Zhou; Min Zhao; Fu-sheng Wang; Tian-jun Jiang; Yong-gang Li; Wei-min Nie; Zhi-ping Zhou; Ye Wang; Jing He; Rong Fan; Jing-min Zhao; Xin-wei Zhang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2003-06-25

Review 6.  Deployment of convalescent plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Authors:  Evan M Bloch; Shmuel Shoham; Arturo Casadevall; Bruce S Sachais; Beth Shaz; Jeffrey L Winters; Camille van Buskirk; Brenda J Grossman; Michael Joyner; Jeffrey P Henderson; Andrew Pekosz; Bryan Lau; Amy Wesolowski; Louis Katz; Hua Shan; Paul G Auwaerter; David Thomas; David J Sullivan; Nigel Paneth; Eric Gehrie; Steven Spitalnik; Eldad A Hod; Lewis Pollack; Wayne T Nicholson; Liise-Anne Pirofski; Jeffrey A Bailey; Aaron Ar Tobian
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Use of convalescent plasma therapy in SARS patients in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Y Cheng; R Wong; Y O Y Soo; W S Wong; C K Lee; M H L Ng; P Chan; K C Wong; C B Leung; G Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Convalescent plasma treatment reduced mortality in patients with severe pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection.

Authors:  Ivan Fn Hung; Kelvin Kw To; Cheuk-Kwong Lee; Kar-Lung Lee; Kenny Chan; Wing-Wah Yan; Raymond Liu; Chi-Leung Watt; Wai-Ming Chan; Kang-Yiu Lai; Chi-Kwan Koo; Tom Buckley; Fu-Loi Chow; Kwan-Keung Wong; Hok-Sum Chan; Chi-Keung Ching; Bone Sf Tang; Candy Cy Lau; Iris Ws Li; Shao-Haei Liu; Kwok-Hung Chan; Che-Kit Lin; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhao; Quan Yuan; Haiyan Wang; Wei Liu; Xuejiao Liao; Yingying Su; Xin Wang; Jing Yuan; Tingdong Li; Jinxiu Li; Shen Qian; Congming Hong; Fuxiang Wang; Yingxia Liu; Zhaoqin Wang; Qing He; Zhiyong Li; Bin He; Tianying Zhang; Yang Fu; Shengxiang Ge; Lei Liu; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Treatment With Convalescent Plasma for Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Shuyi Liu; Tan Tan; Wenhui Huang; Yuhao Dong; Luyan Chen; Qiuying Chen; Lu Zhang; Qingyang Zhong; Xiaoping Zhang; Yujian Zou; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19: The Emerging Immunopathological Determinants for Recovery or Death.

Authors:  Tanveer Ahmad; Rituparna Chaudhuri; Mohan C Joshi; Ahmad Almatroudi; Arshad Husain Rahmani; Syed Mansoor Ali
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  The Development of Ecchymosis after Administration of Convalescent Serum in a Patient with COVID-19 Associated with Thrombocytosis.

Authors:  Rajashree Khot; Sunita D Kumbhalkar; Richa Juneja; Prashant P Joshi
Journal:  Eur J Case Rep Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-13

Review 3.  COVID-19 management landscape: A need for an affordable platform to manufacture safe and efficacious biotherapeutics and prophylactics for the developing countries.

Authors:  Vyankatesh Pidiyar; Ganesh Kumraj; Kafil Ahmed; Syed Ahmed; Sanket Shah; Piyali Majumder; Bhawna Verma; Sarang Pathak; Sushmita Mukherjee
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  Convalescent Plasma for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Henry T Peng; Shawn G Rhind; Andrew Beckett
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-04-07

Review 5.  Plasma therapy: a passive resistance against the deadliest.

Authors:  Anita Hansda; Debarati Biswas; Aishwarya Bhatta; Nishant Chakravorty; Gayatri Mukherjee
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 6.  Landscape of humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 disease and the value of antibody testing.

Authors:  Sundarasamy Mahalingam; John Peter; Ziyang Xu; Devivasha Bordoloi; Michelle Ho; Vaniambadi S Kalyanaraman; Alagarsamy Srinivasan; Kar Muthumani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-17

Review 7.  Molecular and Clinical Aspects of COVID-19 Vaccines and Other Therapeutic Interventions Apropos Emerging Variants of Concern.

Authors:  Khursheed Ul Islam; Thoraya Mohamed Elhassan A-Elgadir; Sarah Afaq; Tanveer Ahmad; Jawed Iqbal
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.