Literature DB >> 32900547

Leveraging Motivations, Personality, and Sensory Cues for Vertebrate Pest Management.

Patrick M Garvey1, Peter B Banks2, Justin P Suraci3, Thomas W Bodey4, Alistair S Glen5, Chris J Jones6, Clare McArthur2, Grant L Norbury6, Catherine J Price2, James C Russell7, Andrew Sih8.   

Abstract

Managing vertebrate pests is a global conservation challenge given their undesirable socio-ecological impacts. Pest management often focuses on the 'average' individual, neglecting individual-level behavioural variation ('personalities') and differences in life histories. These differences affect pest impacts and modify attraction to, or avoidance of, sensory cues. Strategies targeting the average individual may fail to mitigate damage by 'rogues' (individuals causing disproportionate impact) or to target 'recalcitrants' (individuals avoiding standard control measures). Effective management leverages animal behaviours that relate primarily to four core motivations: feeding, fleeing, fighting, and fornication. Management success could be greatly increased by identifying and exploiting individual variation in motivations. We provide explicit suggestions for cue-based tools to manipulate these four motivators, thereby improving pest management outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  animal behaviour; behaviour-based management; individual variation; pest control; sensory cues; wildlife conservation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900547     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  8 in total

1.  The exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas E White; Tanya Latty; Kate D L Umbers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Body Odours as Lures for Stoats Mustela erminea: Captive and Field Trials.

Authors:  Elaine C Murphy; Tim Sjoberg; Tom Agnew; Madeline Sutherland; Graeme Andrews; Raine Williams; Jeff Williams; James Ross; B Kay Clapperton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Assessing Two Different Aerial Toxin Treatments for the Management of Invasive Rats.

Authors:  Tess D R O'Malley; Margaret C Stanley; James C Russell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Can we use antipredator behavior theory to predict wildlife responses to high-speed vehicles?

Authors:  Ryan B Lunn; Bradley F Blackwell; Travis L DeVault; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Niche partitioning in a guild of invasive mammalian predators.

Authors:  Patrick M Garvey; Alistair S Glen; Mick N Clout; Margaret Nichols; Roger P Pech
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  The Olfactory Landscape Concept: A Key Source of Past, Present, and Future Information Driving Animal Movement and Decision-making.

Authors:  Patrick B Finnerty; Clare McArthur; Peter Banks; Catherine Price; Adrian M Shrader
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 11.566

7.  Detection parameters for managing invasive rats in urban environments.

Authors:  Henry R Mackenzie; M Cecilia Latham; Dean P Anderson; Stephen Hartley; Grant L Norbury; A David M Latham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Top-down and sideways: Herbivory and cross-ecosystem connectivity shape restoration success at the salt marsh-upland ecotone.

Authors:  Kerstin Wasson; Karen E Tanner; Andrea Woofolk; Sean McCain; Justin P Suraci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.