| Literature DB >> 32900387 |
Yufei Liu1,2, Dandan Pang1,2, Yiping Tian1,2, Youyong Li1,2, Huibing Jiang1,2, Yunnan Sun1,2, Lifei Xia3,4, Linbo Chen5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The growth process of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) includes vegetative growth and reproductive growth. The reproductive growth period is relatively long (approximately 1.5 years), during which a large number of nutrients are consumed, resulting in reduced tea yield and quality, accelerated aging, and shortened economic life of the tea plant. The formation of unisexual and sterile flowers can weaken the reproductive growth process of the tea plant. To further clarify the molecular mechanisms of pistil deletion in the tea plant, we investigated the transcriptome profiles in the pistil-deficient tea plant (CRQS), wild tea plant (WT), and cultivated tea plant (CT) by using RNA-Seq.Entities:
Keywords: ABCDE model; Camellia sinensis; Ethylene; Pistil deletion; Special germplasm
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32900387 PMCID: PMC7487804 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-020-00153-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hereditas ISSN: 0018-0661 Impact factor: 3.271
Primers used for qRT-PCR verification
| Gene | Forward 5′-3’ | Reverse 5′-3’ |
|---|---|---|
| CSA026751 | CCCCCAGTGAGGCTCTCTTT | TTGAAAGATGGCAAGCCACG |
| Novel05490 | CGTGGATCGATAGGGCAAGC | TCGGAAACCCTACCCAATCC |
| Novel11742 | CCATGCTGACAGTGGCTTCT | ATGTATAGACTTGCCTGCAATAGA |
| CSA010549 | GCTTCTGGACTTGCTATGCG | CTTGATGAGCTCTGGACGGG |
| Novel02945 | AGAAGGTGGCAGAGCTGTTG | TGTCAAGTTGGGTTGGGGAC |
| Novel00816 | ACCAAGTGATCTTCCTGGTTT | AGGCATGCTATATTGAGGGGC |
| CSA026801 | GAAACGATCCAATGCCTGCC | AGGCAATCCTATGTGCAGGG |
| CSA009488 | GAGGCTCGAATTGGCAGGAT | GGTCAAAGTTGGTAACGGCG |
| Novel05812 | GGTCTAACAATGGCCCAAGCAC | GCCTTCCCTAATGCTCTTTCCTCA |
| CSA014619 | AAAGCTCGCGAACTCTCCAT | GTTAACGCAGAGACCGAGGA |
| Novel05521 | GCACTAGCAATCAACAAGTGACC | GCTGCGCTCTCTGCGAAATA |
| CSA003190 | TTCCAATCCATGCCCCACTC | TAAACAGTCCAGGCCTTCGC |
| CSA016398 | CTCACGGTGAACCCTCCTTC | CTCGCATCGAATTGCAGAGC |
| Novel01833 | AAGGATTTGTGTTGCCCTCG | ACAAGCTTGGCTTGCATGAG |
| GAPDH | TTGGCATCGTTGAGGGTCT | CAGTGGGAACACGGAAAGC |
Fig. 1Morphological characteristics of the tea plant flower. (a) Morphologies of CRQS (pistil-deficient) and normal (bisexual) flowers. (b) Morphologies of the CRQS and normal floral organ
Summary dataset of transcriptome assembly
| Sample Name | Clean Reads | Q30(%) | GC Content(%) | Total Mapped(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRQS | CRQS_1 | 63,389,494 | 92.24 | 43.91 | 82.83 |
| CRQS_2 | 50,969,160 | 94.52 | 43.73 | 82.89 | |
| CRQS_3 | 59,270,544 | 94.22 | 43.89 | 83.22 | |
| WT | WT_1 | 59,682,438 | 93.85 | 43.99 | 80.48 |
| WT_2 | 61,456,326 | 93.81 | 43.82 | 80.19 | |
| WT_3 | 57,365,284 | 94.30 | 43.80 | 79.98 | |
| CT | CT_1 | 50,329,310 | 94.36 | 43.90 | 82.96 |
| CT_2 | 57,697,788 | 94.09 | 43.72 | 82.87 | |
| CT_3 | 63,192,122 | 94.35 | 43.58 | 82.34 | |
Fig. 2Cluster analysis of DEGs. (a) The numbers of downregulated and upregulated DEGs. (b) A Venn diagram illustrating the number of DEGs in CRQS vs WT, CRQS vs CT, and WT vs CT. (c) Heat map demonstrating the expression of the DEGs. High-expression genes are denoted in red, whereas low expression genes are denoted in blue on the heat map. The change in expression levels is illustrated after log10 conversion
Fig. 3GO annotation classification statistics of the differential expression transcripts. Blue indicates molecular function, and yellow indicates biological process. According to the p-value from small to large, the first 30 components are displayed
Fig. 4KEGG pathway classification statistics of the differential expression transcripts. According to the p-value from small to large, the first 20 components are displayed
DEGs related to tea flowers with pistil deletion
| Gene Name | Gene ID | log2 (fold change) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRQS/CT | CRQS/WT | Gene Expression Model | |||
| ACS | ACS3-like | CSA026751 | 7.2531 | 3.1576 | UP |
| ACS12-like | Novel05490 | Inf | Inf | UP | |
| ACO | ACO11-like | Novel11742 | −1.1664 | −1.0744 | DOWN |
| ACO6 | CSA010549 | 2.621 | 3.8761 | UP | |
| ACO4-like | Novel02945 | −4.2473 | −3.8215 | DOWN | |
| ACO11 | Novel10788 | −8.0488 | −7.8089 | DOWN | |
| ERF | ERF118-like | Novel00816 | 4.6473 | 3.9518 | UP |
| WIP | WIP3 | CSA026801 | 1.1716 | 1.6214 | UP |
| AP2 | AP2-like | CSA009488 | −1.207 | −1.1156 | DOWN |
| RAP2–7 | Novel05812 | Inf | 10.465 | UP | |
| RAP2–7 | Novel10689 | Inf | Inf | UP | |
| AGL | CAULIFLOWER A-like (MIKC Group) | CSA014619 | 1.1677 | 1.1901 | UP |
| AGL65 (Mδ Group) | Novel05521 | 4.7555 | 5.2182 | UP | |
| AGL11(STK, MIKC Group) | CSA003190 | −2.839 | −1.9205 | DOWN | |
| AGL29(Mα Group) | CSA016398 | 6.4829 | 3.4336 | UP | |
| AGL62(Mα Group) | Novel01833 | Inf | Inf | UP | |
Note: Inf, infinity. UP indicates that the gene expression in CRQS was higher than that in WT and CT; DOWN denotes the opposite
Fig. 5qPCR analysis of selected DEGs. Data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 (CRQS was compared with WT and CT)
Fig. 6Putative gene regulatory network of pistil deletion in tea plants. The arrows (green or yellow) indicate the expression patterns of key genes in pistil-deficient tea flowers; upward arrows indicate upregulated expression and downward arrows indicate downregulated expression