Alessandro Tel1, Francesco Tuniz2, Sara Fabbro3, Salvatore Sembronio4, Fabio Costa4, Massimo Robiony5. 1. Resident, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. 2. Consultant, Neurosurgery Department, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. 3. Resident, Neurosurgery Department, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. 4. Assistant Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. 5. Department Head and Full Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. Electronic address: massimo@robiony.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Restoring the ideal geometry of the skull vault can be a challenging task. This is especially true for complex cases when cranial reconstruction is associated with concomitant cranial resection in a one-stage procedure. Oftentimes, cranioplasty designing and production are delegated to external companies, with a significant increase in time and cost to fabricate an alloplastic implant. This case series collects and critically examines previous experiences in the field of in-house cranial reconstruction providing an updated protocol to establish a novel standard for cranial reconstruction with a substantial reduction of costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A virtual craniotomy was digitally designed by the surgeon and transferred in the operating room using navigation and a surgical guide. Cranial reconstruction was planned using interpolation functions, recreating the ideal shape of the skull vault. Molds were designed, and 3D printed to intra-operatively shape polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) according to the pre-operative plan. For validating the accuracy of reconstruction, as well as the restoration of the appropriate skull thickness, software-encoded color maps and root-mean-square error (RMSE), were calculated. RESULTS: All surgeries were uneventful. No adverse reactions to PMMA were observed. Accuracy of the procedure was validated, showing a submillimetric deviation from the original planning and a plate thickness value similar to the adjoining bone. All steps of design and production were performed by the surgical team, and costs were seven to ten times less than the past. CONCLUSION: We discussed and improved previous reports in the field of computer-guided in-house cranioplasty, particularly when complex one-stage resective and reconstructive procedures are planned. The use of three-dimensional analyses provides a validation of the accuracy of the resulting cranial reconstruction. The authors hope that the results might inspire other colleagues to consider computer-guided in-house cranioplasty, giving surgeons the mastery of each planning phase with a substantial decrease in costs.
BACKGROUND: Restoring the ideal geometry of the skull vault can be a challenging task. This is especially true for complex cases when cranial reconstruction is associated with concomitant cranial resection in a one-stage procedure. Oftentimes, cranioplasty designing and production are delegated to external companies, with a significant increase in time and cost to fabricate an alloplastic implant. This case series collects and critically examines previous experiences in the field of in-house cranial reconstruction providing an updated protocol to establish a novel standard for cranial reconstruction with a substantial reduction of costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A virtual craniotomy was digitally designed by the surgeon and transferred in the operating room using navigation and a surgical guide. Cranial reconstruction was planned using interpolation functions, recreating the ideal shape of the skull vault. Molds were designed, and 3D printed to intra-operatively shape polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) according to the pre-operative plan. For validating the accuracy of reconstruction, as well as the restoration of the appropriate skull thickness, software-encoded color maps and root-mean-square error (RMSE), were calculated. RESULTS: All surgeries were uneventful. No adverse reactions to PMMA were observed. Accuracy of the procedure was validated, showing a submillimetric deviation from the original planning and a plate thickness value similar to the adjoining bone. All steps of design and production were performed by the surgical team, and costs were seven to ten times less than the past. CONCLUSION: We discussed and improved previous reports in the field of computer-guided in-house cranioplasty, particularly when complex one-stage resective and reconstructive procedures are planned. The use of three-dimensional analyses provides a validation of the accuracy of the resulting cranial reconstruction. The authors hope that the results might inspire other colleagues to consider computer-guided in-house cranioplasty, giving surgeons the mastery of each planning phase with a substantial decrease in costs.
Authors: Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 4.967
Authors: Alba Scerrati; Francesco Travaglini; Clarissa Ann Elisabeth Gelmi; Andrea Lombardo; Pasquale De Bonis; Michele Alessandro Cavallo; Paolo Zamboni Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Johannes P Pöppe; Mathias Spendel; Christoph Schwartz; Peter A Winkler; Jörn Wittig Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 2.816