Literature DB >> 32898450

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Single Pulse Irreversible Electroporation: A First in Human Study in 10 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Peter Loh1, René van Es1, Marijn H A Groen1, Kars Neven2,3, Wil Kassenberg1, Fred H M Wittkampf1, Pieter A Doevendans1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a promising new nonthermal ablation technology for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Experimental data suggest that IRE ablation produces large enough lesions without the risk of PV stenosis, artery, nerve, or esophageal damage. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of single pulse IRE PV isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Ten patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation underwent single pulse IRE PV isolation under general anesthesia. Three-dimensional reconstruction and electroanatomical voltage mapping (EnSite Precision, Abbott) of left atrium and PVs were performed using a conventional circular mapping catheter. PV isolation was performed by delivering nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic 6 ms, 200 J direct current IRE applications via a custom nondeflectable 14-polar circular IRE ablation catheter with a variable hoop diameter (16-27 mm). A deflectable sheath (Agilis, Abbott) was used to maneuver the ablation catheter. A minimum of 2 IRE applications with slightly different catheter positions were delivered per vein to achieve circular tissue contact, even if PV potentials were abolished after the first application. Bidirectional PV isolation was confirmed with the circular mapping catheter and a post ablation voltage map. After a 30-minute waiting period, adenosine testing (30 mg) was used to reveal dormant PV conduction.
RESULTS: All 40 PVs could be successfully isolated with a mean of 2.4±0.4 IRE applications per PV. Mean delivered peak voltage and peak current were 2154±59 V and 33.9±1.6 A, respectively. No PV reconnections occurred during the waiting period and adenosine testing. No periprocedural complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In the 10 patients of this first-in-human study, acute bidirectional electrical PV isolation could be achieved safely by single pulse IRE ablation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; electrophysiology; electroporation; pulmonary vein

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32898450     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  12 in total

1.  Feasibility of Linear Irreversible Electroporation Ablation in the Coronary Sinus.

Authors:  Thomas J Buist; Marijn H A Groen; Fred H M Wittkampf; Peter Loh; Pieter A F M Doevendans; René van Es; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 2.  [Catheter ablation : Developments and technique selection].

Authors:  L Yahsaly; J Siebermair; R Wakili
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  Taking the "pulse" of pulsed-field ablation: Real-world experience.

Authors:  Tina Baykaner; Muhammad Fazal; Atul Verma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Muscle contractions and pain sensation accompanying high-frequency electroporation pulses.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cvetkoska; Alenka Maček-Lebar; Peter Trdina; Damijan Miklavčič; Matej Reberšek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Comprehensive evaluation of electrophysiological and 3D structural features of human atrial myocardium with insights on atrial fibrillation maintenance mechanisms.

Authors:  Aleksei V Mikhailov; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Ning Li; Shane S Scott; Esthela J Artiga; Megan M Subr; Jichao Zhao; Brian J Hansen; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.000

6.  Safety and efficacy aspects of pulsed field ablation catheters as a function of electrode proximity to blood and energy delivery method.

Authors:  Andres Belalcazar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-10-13

7.  The Effect of Discharge Mode on the Distribution of Myocardial Pulsed Electric Field-A Simulation Study for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xingkai Ji; Hao Zhang; Lianru Zang; Shengjie Yan; Xiaomei Wu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-03-24

8.  Open-chest Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Cardiac Ganglionated Plexi in Acute Canine Models.

Authors:  Martin van Zyl; Mariam Khabsa; Jason A Tri; Thomas P Ladas; Omar Z Yasin; Adetola O Ladejobi; John Reilly; Barry O'Brien; Kenneth Coffey; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-07-15

9.  Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation.

Authors:  Marijn H A Groen; Vincent J H M van Driel; Kars Neven; Harry van Wessel; Jacques M T de Bakker; Pieter A F Doevendans; Fred H M Wittkampf; Peter Loh; René van Es
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-08-02

10.  How does the level of pulmonary venous isolation compare between pulsed field ablation and thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency, cryo, or laser)?

Authors:  Iwanari Kawamura; Petr Neuzil; Poojita Shivamurthy; Kenji Kuroki; Jeff Lam; Daniel Musikantow; Edward Chu; Mohit K Turagam; Kentro Minami; Moritoshi Funasako; Jan Petru; Subbarao Choudry; Marc A Miller; Marie-Noelle Langan; William Whang; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Jacob S Koruth; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.