Literature DB >> 32897802

Clinical Utility of 4Kscore®, ExosomeDx™ and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Early Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer.

Claire M de la Calle1, Vittorio Fasulo1,2, Janet E Cowan1, Peter E Lonergan1, Martina Maggi1,3, Adam J Gadzinski1, Reuben Au Yeung1, Alberto Saita2, Matthew R Cooperberg1,4, Katsuto Shinohara1, Peter R Carroll1, Hao G Nguyen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate 4Kscore® and ExosomeDx™ with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of high grade prostate cancer and number of biopsies avoided.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients had 1 liquid biomarker test with or without multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. High grade prostate cancer was defined as Gleason grade group 2 or greater. The overall number of avoided biopsies (with Gleason grade 1 or less), and number of missed Gleason grade 2 or greater cancer among the biopsied patients, were determined.
RESULTS: Of the 783 patients in the overall cohort 419 (53.5%) underwent biopsy. 4Kscore and ExosomeDx scores higher than the manufacturers' cut point were associated with PI-RADS™ scores 3 to 5 and Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer. Limiting biopsy to the men with liquid biomarker scores above the manufacturers' cut point would have resulted avoiding 29.5% to 39.9% unnecessary biopsies overall, while missing 4.0% to 4.8% Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group. Screening algorithms with up-front liquid biomarker testing followed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging if the biomarker is above the manufacturers' cut point, then followed by biopsy if the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is positive or if 4Kscore 20 or greater or ExosomeDx 19 or greater would have missed 4.8% to 5.6% of Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group while avoiding 39.4% to 43.0% biopsies and 29.5% to 39.9% multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging overall. Similar algorithms with up-front multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by liquid biomarker testing for negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have missed 2.4% of Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group but only avoided 17.2% 19.3% biopsies overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening algorithms with up-front liquid biomarker testing followed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy at certain biomarker thresholds could reduce unnecessary biopsies, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and overdetection of Gleason grade 1 prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; biopsy; early detection of cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32897802     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Bradley Carthon; Hannah C Sibold; Shannon Blee; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Use of high-resolution micro-ultrasound to predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer prior to surgery: a prospective single-institutional study.

Authors:  Vittorio Fasulo; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Federica Regis; Marco Paciotti; Fancesco Persico; Davide Maffei; Alessandro Uleri; Alberto Saita; Paolo Casale; Rodolfo Hurle; Massimo Lazzeri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prospective evaluation of the role of imaging techniques and TMPRSS2:ERG mutation for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Lazzeri; Vittorio Fasulo; Giovanni Lughezzani; Alessio Benetti; Giulia Soldà; Rosanna Asselta; Ilaria De Simone; Marco Paciotti; Pier Paolo Avolio; Roberto Contieri; Cesare Saitta; Alberto Saita; Rodolfo Hurle; Giorgio Guazzoni; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Paolo Casale
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Grade Migration of Prostate Cancer in the United States During the Last Decade.

Authors:  Leonardo D Borregales; Gina DeMeo; Xiangmei Gu; Emily Cheng; Vanessa Dudley; Edward M Schaeffer; Himanshu Nagar; Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew Vickers; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

5.  RE: Cancer Stage, Treatment, and Survival Among Transgender Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Juan Javier-DesLoges; Amirali Salmasi; Christina Am Jamieson; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 11.816

6.  Concordance of MRI-Guided Fusion and Systematic 12-Core Prostate Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Parsons; Zoya Sandhu; Bridget Foy; Ernest Chan; Bryan Crawford; Libby Petersen; Benjamin Romney; Daniel Sommers; Jay Bishoff; Steven Lynch; Logan Mclean; David Gill
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Current Knowledge to the Role of Metabolomics and Exosomes.

Authors:  Stefano Salciccia; Anna Laura Capriotti; Aldo Laganà; Stefano Fais; Mariantonia Logozzi; Ettore De Berardinis; Gian Maria Busetto; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Gian Piero Ricciuti; Francesco Del Giudice; Alessandro Sciarra; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Beatrice Sciarra; Martina Maggi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  SelectMDx and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate for Men Undergoing Primary Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Assessment in a Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Martina Maggi; Francesco Del Giudice; Ugo G Falagario; Andrea Cocci; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Marina Di Mauro; Giuseppe Salvatore Sepe; Fabio Galasso; Rosario Leonardi; Gabriele Iacona; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Angelo Porreca; Matteo Ferro; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Daniela Terracciano; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri; Ettore De Berardinis; Alessandro Sciarra; Gian Maria Busetto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Clinical Applications of Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: From Screening to Predictive Biomarker.

Authors:  Filip Ionescu; Jingsong Zhang; Liang Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Untargeted Metabolomics Study of Three Matrices: Seminal Fluid, Urine, and Serum to Search the Potential Indicators of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena Buszewska-Forajta; Joanna Raczak-Gutknecht; Wiktoria Struck-Lewicka; Magdalena Nizioł; Małgorzata Artymowicz; Marcin Markuszewski; Marta Kordalewska; Marcin Matuszewski; Michał J Markuszewski
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.