| Literature DB >> 32897788 |
Brian W Powers1, Jiali Yan2, Jingsan Zhu3, Kristin A Linn4, Sachin H Jain5, Jennifer Kowalski6, Amol S Navathe7.
Abstract
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are a vulnerable population with high rates of morbidity, mortality, and acute care use. Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans (SNPs) are an alternative financing and delivery model designed to improve care and reduce costs for patients with ESRD, but little is known about their impact. We used detailed clinical, demographic, and claims data to identify fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who switched to ESRD SNPs offered by a single health plan (SNP enrollees) and similar beneficiaries who remained enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare plans (fee-for-service controls). We then compared three-year mortality and twelve-month utilization rates. Compared with fee-for-service controls, SNP enrollees had lower mortality and lower rates of utilization across the care continuum. These findings suggest that SNPs may be an effective alternative care financing and delivery model for patients with ESRD.Entities:
Keywords: Access and use; Dialysis; End-stage renal disease; Fee-for-service; Health policy; High-need, High-cost patients; Intellectual Property; Medicare Advantage; Medicare savings programs; Skilled nursing facilities; mortality
Year: 2020 PMID: 32897788 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301