Literature DB >> 32897736

Using a Collaborative, Virtual Discussion Platform to Mobilize Oncologic Expertise for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Anthony Bejjani1, Lindsay Burt2, Christina Washington3, Michael Terao4,5, Samir Housri6, Nadine Housri6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: COVID-19 is a rapidly emerging worldwide pandemic that has drastically changed health care across the United States. Oncology patients are especially vulnerable. Novel point-of-care resources may be useful to rapidly disseminate peer-reviewed information from oncology experts nationwide. We describe our initial experience with distributing this information through a private, curated, virtual collaboration question-and-answer (Q&A) platform for oncologists.
METHODS: The Q&A database was queried for a 2-month period from March 12 to May 12, 2020. We collected the total number of views and unique viewers for the questions. We classified the questions according to their emphasis (practice management, clinical management, both) and disease type across radiation oncology, medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, and pediatric oncology.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine questions were approved, 67 of which were answered and generated 49,494 views with 5,148 unique viewers. Most discussions covered clinical management, with breast cancer being the most active disease site. Ten questions covered pediatric oncology and gynecologic oncology. Forty-seven percent of the 11,010 users of the platform visited the website during the 2-month period.
CONCLUSION: Discussions on the Q&A platform reached a substantial number of oncologists throughout the nation and may help oncologists to modify their treatment in real time with the rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32897736      PMCID: PMC7529517          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.20.00073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of clinical opinion leaders in guideline implementation and quality improvement.

Authors:  C Borbas; N Morris; B McLaughlin; R Asinger; F Gobel
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Irma Klerings; Alexandra S Weinhandl; Kylie J Thaler
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2015-07-27

3.  Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; T J McLaughlin; J H Gurwitz; E Guadagnoli; P J Hauptman; C Borbas; N Morris; B McLaughlin; X Gao; D J Willison; R Asinger; F Gobel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  How does an "opinion leader" influence my practice?

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Jonathan Sherbino
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.410

5.  Do local opinion leaders augment hospital quality improvement efforts? A randomized trial to promote adherence to unstable angina guidelines.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; C Suzanne Baker; Ellen Funkhouser; Gustavo R Heudebert; Jeroan J Allison; Crayton A Fargason; Qing Li; Sharina D Person; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Skills, knowledge and attributes of support group leaders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amanda Pomery; Penelope Schofield; Miranda Xhilaga; Karla Gough
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 7.  Current theoretical models of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): conceptual review and treatment implications.

Authors:  Evelyn Behar; Ilyse Dobrow DiMarco; Eric B Hekler; Jan Mohlman; Alison M Staples
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2009-07-08

8.  Answers to questions posed during daily patient care are more likely to be answered by UpToDate than PubMed.

Authors:  Arjen Hoogendam; Anton F H Stalenhoef; Pieter F de Vries Robbé; A John P M Overbeke
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected cancer patients: a retrospective case study in three hospitals within Wuhan, China.

Authors:  L Zhang; F Zhu; L Xie; C Wang; J Wang; R Chen; P Jia; H Q Guan; L Peng; Y Chen; P Peng; P Zhang; Q Chu; Q Shen; Y Wang; S Y Xu; J P Zhao; M Zhou
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruchong Chen; Wei Wang; Jianfu Li; Ke Xu; Caichen Li; Qing Ai; Weixiang Lu; Hengrui Liang; Shiyue Li; Jianxing He
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  2 in total

1.  Attitudes and access to resources and strategies to improve quality of radiotherapy among US radiation oncologists: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Y Helen Zhang; Elaine Cha; Kathleen Lynch; Renee Gennarelli; Jeffrey Brower; Michael V Sherer; Daniel W Golden; Susan Chimonas; Deborah Korenstein; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.667

2.  Creating a cancer genomics curriculum for pediatric hematology-oncology fellows: A national needs assessment.

Authors:  Alise K Murray; Rose B McGee; Roya M Mostafavi; Xiaoqing Wang; Zhaohua Lu; Jessica M Valdez; Michael A Terao; Kim E Nichols
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.