Literature DB >> 32897586

Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the Science and a Proposed Path Forward.

Gerald T Ankley1, Philippa Cureton2, Robert A Hoke3, Magali Houde4, Anupama Kumar5, Jessy Kurias2, Roman Lanno6, Chris McCarthy7, John Newsted8, Christopher J Salice9, Bradley E Sample10, Maria S Sepúlveda11, Jeffery Steevens12, Sara Valsecchi13.   

Abstract

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass a large, heterogenous group of chemicals of potential concern to human health and the environment. Based on information for a few relatively well-understood PFAS such as perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate, there is ample basis to suspect that at least a subset can be considered persistent, bioaccumulative, and/or toxic. However, data suitable for determining risks in either prospective or retrospective assessments are lacking for the majority of PFAS. In August 2019, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry sponsored a workshop that focused on the state-of-the-science supporting risk assessment of PFAS. The present review summarizes discussions concerning the ecotoxicology and ecological risks of PFAS. First, we summarize currently available information relevant to problem formulation/prioritization, exposure, and hazard/effects of PFAS in the context of regulatory and ecological risk assessment activities from around the world. We then describe critical gaps and uncertainties relative to ecological risk assessments for PFAS and propose approaches to address these needs. Recommendations include the development of more comprehensive monitoring programs to support exposure assessment, an emphasis on research to support the formulation of predictive models for bioaccumulation, and the development of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methods to efficiently assess biological effects for potentially sensitive species/endpoints. Addressing needs associated with assessing the ecological risk of PFAS will require cross-disciplinary approaches that employ both conventional and new methods in an integrated, resource-effective manner. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:564-605.
© 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological risk; Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances; Review; Strategy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32897586     DOI: 10.1002/etc.4869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  9 in total

1.  Understanding Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) in Indoor Dust.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Liu
Journal:  Indoor Built Environ       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Effects of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) co-exposure on phase I biotransformation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Megan E Solan; Marco E Franco; Ramon Lavado
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.014

Review 3.  Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment.

Authors:  Marina G Evich; Mary J B Davis; James P McCord; Brad Acrey; Jill A Awkerman; Detlef R U Knappe; Andrew B Lindstrom; Thomas F Speth; Caroline Tebes-Stevens; Mark J Strynar; Zhanyun Wang; Eric J Weber; W Matthew Henderson; John W Washington
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Anthropogenic Drivers of Variation in Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Otters (Lutra lutra) from England and Wales.

Authors:  Emily O'Rourke; Juliet Hynes; Sara Losada; Jonathan L Barber; M Glória Pereira; Eleanor F Kean; Frank Hailer; Elizabeth A Chadwick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Systematic developmental toxicity assessment of a structurally diverse library of PFAS in zebrafish.

Authors:  Lisa Truong; Yvonne Rericha; Preethi Thunga; Skylar Marvel; Dylan Wallis; Michael T Simonich; Jennifer A Field; Dunping Cao; David M Reif; Robyn L Tanguay
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 14.224

Review 6.  Omics-based ecosurveillance for the assessment of ecosystem function, health, and resilience.

Authors:  David J Beale; Oliver A H Jones; Utpal Bose; James A Broadbent; Thomas K Walsh; Jodie van de Kamp; Andrew Bissett
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2022-04-15

7.  Comparative Toxicity of Aquatic Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Exposure in Three Species of Amphibians.

Authors:  R Wesley Flynn; Gary Hoover; Michael Iacchetta; Samuel Guffey; Chloe de Perre; Belinda Huerta; Weiming Li; Jason T Hoverman; Linda Lee; Maria S Sepúlveda
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Survey of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface water collected in Pensacola, FL.

Authors:  Bianca Ferreira da Silva; Juan J Aristizabal-Henao; Joe Aufmuth; Jill Awkerman; John A Bowden
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-13

Review 9.  Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in US Ambient Surface Waters: A Review of Occurrence in Aquatic Environments and Comparison to Global Concentrations.

Authors:  Amanda L Jarvis; James R Justice; Michael C Elias; Brian Schnitker; Kathryn Gallagher
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.218

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.