| Literature DB >> 32897482 |
Liselotte De Wit1,2, Michael Marsiske3, Deirdre O'Shea3, Roy P C Kessels4,5, Andrea M Kurasz3, Brittany DeFeis3, Nancy Schaefer6, Glenn E Smith7.
Abstract
The notion that procedural learning and memory is spared in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has important implications for interventions aiming to build on intact cognitive functions. However, despite these clinical implications, there are mixed findings in the literature about whether or not procedural learning remains intact. This meta-analysis examines the standard mean difference of all published studies regarding procedural learning in AD dementia or amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) compared to cognitively healthy older adults. Additionally, we conducted statistical equivalence analyses. Our systematic review showed that only a limited number of studies (k = 17) have compared procedural learning between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia and healthy controls. Our meta-analysis, which synthesized these studies, demonstrated that while procedural learning performance was not statistically equivalent between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia, and healthy older adults, the difference was clinically and statistically trivial. Although larger studies are needed, the present findings suggest that procedural learning does appear to remain spared in aMCI and AD dementia.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Pattern learning; Procedural learning; Procedural memory; Skill learning
Year: 2020 PMID: 32897482 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-020-09449-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychol Rev ISSN: 1040-7308 Impact factor: 7.444