Yoon-Kyoung Hong1, Hyunkeun Kim1, Kwan Soo Ko1. 1. Department of Microbiology and Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the colistin heteroresistance patterns in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. To identify colistin heteroresistance, population analysis profiling was performed for six in vitro colistin-susceptible A. baumannii isolates. Survival rates with and without prior exposure to colistin (at concentrations between 0 and 32 mg/L) were measured in media with and without colistin. Amino acid substitutions were also detected in colonies that survived in media with 4 mg/L colistin without further antibiotic treatment in six A. baumannii isolates. A stability test was also performed to investigate whether colistin resistance is maintained without antibiotic treatment. Although only three isolates showed typical colistin heteroresistance pattern, colistin-resistant populations were identified even without prior exposure to colistin in all A. baumannii isolates. Nearly all colonies of typical colistin-heteroresistant isolates (Type I heteroresistance) that survived after exposure to high colistin concentrations were found to be colistin-resistant, whereas no resistant colonies were identified in the other isolates (Type II heteroresistance). Stability tests showed that most of the surviving populations in media with 4 mg/L colistin without further antibiotic exposure failed to preserve resistance to colistin. Colistin-resistant populations also showed either no change in amino acid sequences, or diverse amino acid substitutions. We identified two types of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates. Because Type I colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates could not be eradicated in vitro by high concentrations of colistin, differentiating two colistin heteroresistance types would be important for the treatment of A. baumannii infections using colistin.
In this study, we investigated the colistin heteroresistance patterns in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. To identify colistin heteroresistance, population analysis profiling was performed for six in vitro colistin-susceptible A. baumannii isolates. Survival rates with and without prior exposure to colistin (at concentrations between 0 and 32 mg/L) were measured in media with and without colistin. Amino acid substitutions were also detected in colonies that survived in media with 4 mg/L colistin without further antibiotic treatment in six A. baumannii isolates. A stability test was also performed to investigate whether colistin resistance is maintained without antibiotic treatment. Although only three isolates showed typical colistin heteroresistance pattern, colistin-resistant populations were identified even without prior exposure to colistin in all A. baumannii isolates. Nearly all colonies of typical colistin-heteroresistant isolates (Type I heteroresistance) that survived after exposure to high colistin concentrations were found to be colistin-resistant, whereas no resistant colonies were identified in the other isolates (Type II heteroresistance). Stability tests showed that most of the surviving populations in media with 4 mg/L colistin without further antibiotic exposure failed to preserve resistance to colistin. Colistin-resistant populations also showed either no change in amino acid sequences, or diverse amino acid substitutions. We identified two types of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates. Because Type I colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates could not be eradicated in vitro by high concentrations of colistin, differentiating two colistin heteroresistance types would be important for the treatment of A. baumannii infections using colistin.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acinetobacter baumannii ; Colistin; heteroresistance; population analysis profiling; stability
Acinetobacter baumannii is a catalase-positive,
gram-negative, and opportunistic pathogen responsible for life-threatening infectious
disease conditions including pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis [1]. Treating A. baumannii infections
is challenging due to the remarkable ability of this pathogen to acquire antibiotic
resistance [2]. A.
baumannii has also been listed among Priority 1 pathogens for which new
antibiotics are urgently needed by World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017 [3].Increasing numbers of multidrug – or carbapenem-resistant A.
baumannii infections have urged the use of polymyxin antibiotics (colistin and
polymyxin B) for their treatment [4]. The
bactericidal activity of colistin is based on disruption of the bacterial membrane and
subsequent leakage of cellular content via electrostatic interactions between
L-2,4-diaminobytyric acid (Dab) groups of colistin and the 1- and 4-phosphate groups of
lipid A of the bacterial outer membrane [5,6]. A. baumannii may
develop colistin resistance either through modification of lipid A with phosphoethanolamine
associated with PmrAB two-component regulatory system or loss of lipooligosaccharide (LOS)
[7-9].Antibiotic heteroresistance is referred as a phenomenon where subpopulation of susceptible
bacterial isolates exhibits reduced susceptibility to a particular antibiotic [10,11].
Heteroresistance to colistin in A. baumannii has been reported
frequently [12-15]. These
previous studies showed that colistin heteroresistance is common, and associated with PmrAB
mutations, although the clinical significance has not been fully determined yet [12,15].In this study, we reported two types of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates. One is typical heteroresistance, a phenotype in which a
bacterium includes subpopulations showing a substantial reduction in antibiotic
susceptibility compared with the main population, has been identified in population analysis
profiling (PAP), a gold standard method for determination of antibiotic heteroresistance
[10]. In this type of heteroresistance,
colistin-resistant colonies were identified in 10 mg/L of colistin concentration in PAP. In
the other type of colistin heteroresistance, no surviving colonies were detected in high
colistin concentration in PAP. However, colistin-resistant subpopulations could be
identified even without prior exposure of colistin in these A.
baumannii isolates. In addition, we investigated the effects of antibiotic
treatment on the two types of colistin-heteroresistant A.
baumannii isolates.
Materials and methods
Bacterial isolates
Six A. baumannii isolates, which were from blood of
patients in Samsung Changwon Hospital in Korea (Table
1), were included in this study (Table
1). All of them were identified as colistin-susceptible via in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Table 1.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles and genotypes of A.
baumannii isolates included in this study.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles and genotypes of A.
baumannii isolates included in this study.CST, colistin; A/S, ampicillin/sulbactam; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; CIP,
ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; IMI, imipenem; MER, meropenem; SXT,
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; P/T,
piperacillin/tazobactam; T/C, ticarcillin/clavulanate; TGC, tigecycline.
In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of the six A. baumannii
isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method as per the Clinical
Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [16]. Susceptibilities to 12 antibiotics were tested, including colistin,
ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem,
meropenem, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam,
ticarcillin/clavulanate, and tigecycline. Susceptibility was interpreted according to CLSI
breakpoints [16], except for tigecycline.
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and P.
aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality control strains.For each of the six A. baumannii isolates, ten colonies
were selected, which survived in media with 4 mg/L colistin after no exposure to any
antibiotics. For these strains, colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were
determined using the same broth microdilution method as mentioned above.
Population analysis profiling
To identify colistin heteroresistance in in the usual way, PAP was performed for the six
colistin-susceptible A. baumannii isolates. Briefly, a 50 μL
aliquot of bacterial culture containing 1.5 × 105 cfu/mL was streaked onto
Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates containing either 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, or 10 mg/L
colistin. Colonies were counted after overnight incubation at 37 °C. The limit of
quantification (LOQ) was 20 cfu/mL. The PAP was repeated with three independent
experiments.
Measurement of survival rates after exposure to colistin
We performed the additional experiments to measure if a resistant subpopulation exists
originally in the susceptible isolate, and if the resistant population survived against
high concentrations of colistin. We expected that only typical heteroresistant isolates
(designated Type I later) show existence of colistin-resistant subpopulation, but not
others (designated Type II later) do not.Experiment 1. A total of 10 mL bacterial aliquot containing
1.5 × 105 cfu/mL was inoculated into flasks including Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth
and 0, 0.016, 0.032, 0.062, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg/L colistin (Figure 1a). The cultures were incubated for 18 h at
37°C with shaking. After incubation, the cultures were serially diluted using a saline
solution, and cultured on agar plates containing MH broth with (4 mg/L, a breakpoint
concentration of colistin resistance) or without colistin. Colonies were counted after
18 h of incubation at 37°C.
Figure 1.
Illustrations of methods used to measure survival rates of total and
colistin-resistant populations after exposure to various colistin concentrations.
(a, Experiment 1) Bacteria were cultured in MH broth containing
different colistin concentrations. After incubation for 18 h at 37°C with shaking,
the total surviving colonies on MH agar plates without colistin and resistant
colonies on plates with 4 mg/L colistin were counted. (b, Experiment 2)
Unlike experiment 1, bacterial culture exposed to colistin was diluted every hour,
and plated on MH agar with or without colistin. (c, Experiment 3) The
bacterial culture was transferred to fresh media at each time point, and then
cultivated.
Illustrations of methods used to measure survival rates of total and
colistin-resistant populations after exposure to various colistin concentrations.
(a, Experiment 1) Bacteria were cultured in MH broth containing
different colistin concentrations. After incubation for 18 h at 37°C with shaking,
the total surviving colonies on MHagar plates without colistin and resistant
colonies on plates with 4 mg/L colistin were counted. (b, Experiment 2)
Unlike experiment 1, bacterial culture exposed to colistin was diluted every hour,
and plated on MHagar with or without colistin. (c, Experiment 3) The
bacterial culture was transferred to fresh media at each time point, and then
cultivated.Experiment 2. Similar to experiment 1, 10 mL of bacterial
aliquot was inoculated into flasks including MH broth and 0, 0.016, 0.032, 0.062, 0.125,
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg/L colistin. The cultures were incubated at 37°C, and
diluted cultures were plated on MHagar with (4 mg/L) or without colistin every hour,
unlike the procedure used in experiment 1 (Figure
1b). Colonies were counted after 18 h of incubation at 37°C.Experiment 3. A similar procedure to that of experiment 2
was followed with several modifications. Here, the cultured bacteria were transferred to
fresh media prior to plating (Figure 1c). The
surviving colonies were counted after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 h culture. Colistin
concentrations in flasks were 0, 0.125, 1, 4, and 16 mg/L.
TDtest for detection of antibiotic tolerance
The Tolerance Disk Test (TDtest) was performed to identify antibiotic tolerance in
A. baumannii isolates [17]. First, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay was performed using a disk on which
colistin (10 mg/L) was applied. Next, this “colistin disk” was replaced with a “glucose
disk” (2 mg/L glucose was applied) after 18 h, and the plate was incubated overnight. If
newly growing colonies are observed within the inhibition zone, it is considered that
tolerant subpopulations exist in the susceptible isolate.
Determination of PmrCAB and LpxACD amino acid sequences
Ten colonies were obtained from cultures of each of the six A.
baumannii isolates grown in media containing 4 mg/L colistin without prior
exposure to any other antibiotics. In addition, three colonies were obtained from three
Type I A. baumannii isolates grown in media containing
4 mg/L colistin after exposure to high colistin concentration (32 mg/L). For these
colonies, nucleotide and corresponding amino acid sequences of pmrCAB and lpxACDgenes were determined.
Stability test for colistin resistance
We performed stability test for resistance to know if colistin-resistant subpopulations
without genetic variations in well-known genes associated with colistin resistance
preserve their colistin resistance phenotype. In six A.
baumannii isolates, we selected each one colony with no amino acid
substitutions in PmrAB and LpxACD sequences among ten colonies surviving in media with
4 mg/L colistin without prior exposure to colistin in the experiment 1. Colonies were
repeatedly sub-cultured in the absence of colistin treatment to investigate the stability
of the colistin resistance. Overnight cultures were diluted to 1:100 in fresh LB medium
without colistin, and incubated with shaking (180 rpm) at 37°C for 24 h. We estimated
colistin MICs for all serial sub-cultures.
Experimental procedures for other bacterial species and antibiotics
For Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa strains, experiment 1 was performed. These strains were not
heteroresistant to colistin (MIC 1 mg/L). For the A.
baumannii strain SCH2, PAP and survival rate measurement after exposure to
antibiotics (experiment 1) were performed using ciprofloxacin and imipenem.
Results
Six A. baumannii isolates were found susceptible to colistin
based on broth microdilution assay results (MICs of 1 or 2 mg/L) (Table 1). However, population analysis profiling showed that
cultures of three A. baumannii isolates showed typical
heteroresistance pattern, in which subpopulations survived at a frequency of
>10−7 in the media containing 10 mg/L colistin (Figure 2a). However, the other three isolates did not, that is, no
colonies were found in the media with 10 mg/L colistin (Figure 2b). Typical colistin heteroresistance identified clearly in PAP was
designated Type I. The others could not be identified in PAP, but it was shown that
resistant subpopulation exists in original population without prior antibiotic exposure
(described below). Thus, these should be regarded to be heteroresistant to colistin, and
designated Type II. Sequence types of the typical colistin-heteroresistant isolates were
different from each other (ST681, ST229, and ST191), whereas those of the other isolates
were identical (ST191) (Table 1). Five A. baumannii isolates excluding an isolate SHC2 were resistant to
most other antibiotics except for tigecycline (Table
1).
Figure 2.
The results of population analysis profiling (PAP) of Type I colistin-heteroresistant
A. baumannii isolates (SCH2, SCH39, and SCH105) (A)
and Type II colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii
isolates (SCH91, SCH113, and K20-B-871) (B). LOQ: limit of quantification.
The results of population analysis profiling (PAP) of Type I colistin-heteroresistant
A. baumannii isolates (SCH2, SCH39, and SCH105) (A)
and Type II colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii
isolates (SCH91, SCH113, and K20-B-871) (B). LOQ: limit of quantification.Figures 3(a and b) show the surviving numbers of
total and colistin-resistant sub-populations in typical colistin-heteroresistant (Type I)
and the other (Type II) isolates with respect to colistin concentrations, respectively, in
the experiment 1. Figures 3(c and d) indicate the
ratios of the colistin-resistant colonies over total colonies in Figures 3(a and b), respectively. Contrary to initial expectations,
in all A. baumannii isolates, including those of the Type II
isolates, colonies surviving in MH broth with 4 mg/L colistin were surprisingly identified
in PAP analysis even without prior exposure to colistin. Hence, approximately
10−7–10−6 of the total population was found to be resistant to
colistin (Figure 3c and d). The survival patterns of
populations were similar to each other irrespective of pattern in PAP at low colistin
concentrations (below 0.5 mg/L): only a small proportion of the surviving population was
resistant to colistin. On the contrary, survival patterns differed between Type I and Type
II isolates with increasing colistin concentrations. Type I isolates survived after exposure
to high concentrations of colistin (at least 8 mg/L), and most surviving colonies were
resistant to colistin (Figure 3a and c). However,
total rate of surviving colonies decreased, and colistin-resistant colonies were not
identified after exposure to high concentrations of colistin in cultures of Type II isolates
(Figure 3b and d).
Figure 3.
The results of experiment 1. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. The total surviving populations were identified in media
without antibiotics, and colistin-resistant populations were identified in media
including 4 mg/L colistin. (a) The total and colistin-resistant,
surviving populations in Type I A. baumannii isolates,
(b) the total and colistin-resistant, surviving populations in Type II
A. baumannii isolates, (c) the rates of
colistin-resistant population within the total populations in Type I A. baumannii isolates, and (d) the rates of
colistin-resistant population within the total populations in Type II A. baumannii isolates.
The results of experiment 1. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. The total surviving populations were identified in media
without antibiotics, and colistin-resistant populations were identified in media
including 4 mg/L colistin. (a) The total and colistin-resistant,
surviving populations in Type I A. baumannii isolates,
(b) the total and colistin-resistant, surviving populations in Type II
A. baumannii isolates, (c) the rates of
colistin-resistant population within the total populations in Type I A. baumannii isolates, and (d) the rates of
colistin-resistant population within the total populations in Type II A. baumannii isolates.We also performed the procedure described in experiment 1 for colistin-susceptible E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains
(Supplementary Figure S1). These strains showed similar results to those obtained with
colistin-susceptible A. baumannii strains. Although these were
not initially exposed to colistin, some colonies survived in media with 4 mg/L colistin.
However, they did not survive upon exposure to high colistin concentrations. Experiment 1
was performed using ciprofloxacin and imipenem for SCH2 strain, which is susceptible to both
antibiotics. PAP showed that this strain was not heteroresistant to any of these antibiotics
(Supplementary Figure S2a). No ciprofloxacin – or imipenem-resistant colonies were
identified at any concentration, including the case where no antibiotics were used. The
total surviving population also decreased as antibiotic concentration increased (Figure
S2b).We performed additional experiments (experiments 2 and 3, as described in Methods) on
survival rates after exposure to colistin to know if the survival rates change with exposure
time of colistin in Type I and Type II colistin-heteroresistant isolates. Figures 4 and 5 show the
results of experiments 2 and 3, respectively, revealing different patterns of survival rates
in Type I and Type II colistin-heteroresistant isolates with exposure time of colistin.
These figures display the survival patterns of total (no antibiotics in media) and
colistin-resistant subpopulations with respect to colistin concentration and exposure time
in cultures of Type I (SCH2) and Type II (SCH91) isolates, respectively. In experiment 2,
the ratio of surviving colonies on 4 mg/L of colistin to the total CFU obtained without
antibiotics in the SCH2 isolate (Type I isolate) increased with increased exposure time
until the colistin concentration of 0.5 mg/L. After that, the ratio decreased with time as
colistin concentration was increased (Figure 4a). No
colistin-resistant subpopulation was observed with short exposure times: colistin-resistant
colonies were identified only after 4 h at concentrations above 2 mg/L. In cultures of the
SCH91, a type II isolate, colistin-resistant subpopulations appeared at later time points
than those of the type I isolate. Total surviving colonies decreased with increasing
exposure times at concentrations above 4 mg/L (Figure
4b).
Figure 4.
The results of experiment 2. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. (a) SCH2, a Type I A.
baumannii isolates, (b) SCH91, Type II A.
baumannii isolates.
Figure 5.
The results of experiment 3. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. (a) SCH2, a Type I A.
baumannii isolates, (b) SCH91, Type II A.
baumannii isolates.
The results of experiment 2. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. (a) SCH2, a Type I A.
baumannii isolates, (b) SCH91, Type II A.
baumannii isolates.The results of experiment 3. Total and colistin-resistant populations with respect to
colistin concentration. (a) SCH2, a Type I A.
baumannii isolates, (b) SCH91, Type II A.
baumannii isolates.The procedure followed in experiment 3 was different from that of experiment 2, in that the
cultures were re-inoculated into fresh media every hour. The results of experiment 3 (Figure 5) were similar to those of experiments 1 and 2
(Figures 3 and 4). Here, the number of colistin-resistant colonies gradually increased with time
following exposure of Type I and Type II isolates to colistin (Figure 5a and b). The proportion of colistin-resistant subpopulation
within the total population increased in cultures of the Type I isolate (SCH2) with
increasing exposure time and colistin concentrations (Figure 5a). Colistin-resistant colonies were identified in cultures of the Type II
isolate (SCH91) at low colistin concentrations, yet absent when the isolate was exposed to 4
and 16 mg/L colistin (Figure 5b).MIC distribution of colonies that survived in media with 4 mg/L colistin without prior
exposure to antibiotics in experiment 1 is shown in Figure
6(a). Most colonies of Type I as well as Type II isolates showed MICs equal to or
higher than 4 mg/L, indicating colistin resistance. TDtest for detection of tolerant
subpopulation yielded no growing colonies upon replacement of the colistin disk with a
glucose disk (data not shown). The stability test showed that the colistin resistances in
surviving colonies in media with 4 mg/L colistin without other antibiotic exposure were
mostly unstable (Figure 6b). Here, only one colony
of the Type I SCH105 isolate remained colistin-resistant even after seven days of serial
sub-culturing in the absence of antibiotics.
Figure 6.
(a) Colistin MIC distributions of strains in media containing 4 mg/L
colistin under exposure to colistin as described in experiment 1. The grey highlighted
area indicates the MIC range corresponding to colistin resistance. (b)
The results of stability test for colistin resistance.
(a) Colistin MIC distributions of strains in media containing 4 mg/L
colistin under exposure to colistin as described in experiment 1. The grey highlighted
area indicates the MIC range corresponding to colistin resistance. (b)
The results of stability test for colistin resistance.Amino acid substitutions in PmrAB and LpxACD sequences were determined in colonies that
survived in media with 4 mg/L without antibiotic exposure (Table 2). For some colonies, no amino acid substitutions were
observed, whereas for others, observed substitutions were diverse. No amino acid alterations
were observed in ten colonies of the Type I SCH2 isolate. Amino acid substitutions were
identified in two and four colonies of isolates SCH39 and SCH105, respectively. Moreover,
amino acid changes in PmrAB and LpxACD were observed in colonies of SCH39 and SCH105,
respectively. There were no colonies exhibiting identical substitutions. All but two
colonies of the Type II SCH91 isolate showed amino acid substitutions (six and two
substitutions in PmrB and two in LpxC, respectively). Substitutions observed in these
colonies were also different from each other. Three colonies of SCH113 and two of K20-B-871
isolates showed amino acid changes in PmrA and PmrB genes, respectively. Only three colonies
of SCH113 isolate showed the same amino acid substitutions (S16L in PmrA).
Table 2.
Amino acid substitutions in PmrCAB and LpxACD genes in colonies that survived in
media with 4 mg/L colistin without antibiotic exposure.
Strain
Colony No.
Colistin MIC (mg/L)
PmrA
PmrB
LpxA
LpxC
LpxD
Type I
heteroresistance
SCH2
1
2
2
4
3
64
4
64
5
64
6
8
7
4
8
64
9
4
10
4
SCH39
1
32
2
1
3
1
4
16
5
8
6
8
7
1
8
8
A14V
9
32
E301D
10
8
SCH105
1
16
M169T
2
16
3
>64
4
32
5
8
R258H
6
4
T81M
7
16
T290I
8
16
9
32
G231V
10
17
Type II
heteroresistance
SCH91
1
16
2
>64
T235I
3
16
L271F
4
64
P170L
5
4
M62I
6
8
L271F
7
64
8
64
S17R
9
8
C63Y
10
64
G260D
SCH113
1
8
G309V
2
8
3
32
4
32
S16L
5
4
6
4
7
32
8
>64
9
32
S16L
10
32
S16L
K20-B-871
1
2
2
4
3
64
T232I
4
2
5
8
6
2
7
16
8
32
9
32
L168S
10
2
Amino acid substitutions in PmrCAB and LpxACDgenes in colonies that survived in
media with 4 mg/L colistin without antibiotic exposure.Next, three colonies from each of the three Type I A.
baumannii isolates were selected in media with 4 mg/L colistin after the exposure
to high colistin concentration (32 mg/L). All of these strains were found to be resistant to
colistin. Amino acid sequences of PmrAB and LpxACDgenes were identical to each other in
colonies of the same strain. No amino acid substitutions were observed in colonies of SCH2
isolate. On the contrary, substitutions were identified in colonies of other isolates: R263H
in PmrB of SCH39 isolate, and A58V in LpxD of SCH105 isolate.
Discussion
The occurrence of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii
has been attributed to the development of antibiotic resistance and failures in therapeutic
treatment [14,18]. The most important finding of this study was that there are two types of
colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates. Antibiotic
heteroresistance has been defined in various ways, with respect to clonality, level of
resistance, frequency, and stability [10,11]. Mixed infections or slow-growing resistant
mutants during antibiotic treatment may result in polyclonal heteroresistance. Level of
resistance of resistant subpopulation compared with that of the main population may be
different according to investigators. The frequency of the resistant population may also be
different according to the definitions. Some investigators have defined heteroresistance as
stable, but others have regarded it as heteroresistance even if the resistance of the
subpopulation decreases or reverts to susceptibility [10]. No matter how heteroresistance is defined, it is obvious that heteroresistant
isolates included a small resistant population in main susceptible population. Two types of
colistin heteroresistance identified in this study may show different features. In the Type
I heteroresistance, resistant populations are positively selected in the presence of a high
concentration of colistin and expand during growth. On the other hand, resistance
populations in the Type II heteroresistance show their resistance phenotype only at low
antibiotic concentrations possibly due to mutations that confer some degree of antibiotic
resistance but at the same time, they also impose a trade-off. In the absence of selection,
these mutants are rapidly wiped out of the population. This Type II heteroresistance may be
antibiotic-specific.In this study, all A. baumannii isolates, which were judged
as susceptible to colistin by method of determining MICs, are shown to include
colistin-resistant populations without prior exposure to colistin. However, one group (Type
I) showed a typical pattern of heteroresistance, but another group (Type II) did not. In
addition, the pattern of surviving colonies with increasing concentration of exposure was
different between two types. The proportion of colistin-resistant population was
approximately 10−5 in all isolates, and this proportion was maintained until the
isolates were exposed to colistin at 0.25–0.5 mg/L concentrations. While nearly only
colistin-resistant population survived even with prior exposure of high concentration of
colistin in Type I heteroresistant isolates, no resistant population survived with prior
exposure of high concentration of colistin in Type II isolates.The presence of Type II heteroresistance, which is defined as no survival of resistant
population with exposure with high concentration of antibiotics, was demonstrated for other
species as well (E. coli and P.
aeruginosa). However, this phenomenon was not observed with other antibiotics
such as fluoroquinolones and carbapenems, and therefore, may be a unique feature of
colistin. Thus, treatment of even low concentrations of colistin increased the likelihood of
the selection of resistant subpopulations regardless of bacterial species. The results
presented in this study are also in line with those of a previous study on mutant prevention
concentrations (MPCs) of colistin for A. baumannii and other
gram-negative pathogens, where very high concentrations were reported [19].On the contrary, treatments with high colistin concentration resulted in different results
for Type I and II A. baumannii isolates. In Type I
heteroresistant isolates, nearly the whole surviving population was found to be resistant
upon exposure to high colistin concentrations, suggesting that colistin treatment on the
Type I colistin-heteroresistant isolates may trigger the emergence of colistin resistance.
However, no colistin-resistant colonies could be identified for Type II isolates at high
colistin concentrations.Our findings suggest that colistin may be ineffective for treatment of infections caused by
Type I colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates.
However, high doses of colistin may be effective against Type II colistin-heteroresistant
A. baumannii infections. Thus, differentiating Type I
heteroresistance from Type II heteroresistance is important for the treatment of
gram-negative pathogeninfections using colistin.On the contrary, a high nephrotoxicity risk has also been previously reported for colistin
treatment [20,21]. Intracellular accumulation of colistin was proposed to be a precondition for
colistin-mediated renal damage, and high colistin doses increase the risk of nephrotoxicity
[22]. Further considerations may be required to
overcome these problems, for example usage of polymyxin B instead of colistin, antibiotic
combinations, or additional treatments using antioxidant substances [23,24].The colonies that survived in colistin-containing media showed different amino acid
substitutions, even from the same isolate. Only two amino acid alterations (P170L and S17R
in PmrB) have been reported in previous studies [25], but others including mutations in LpxACD were newly identified in this study.
Although it is required to investigate if the mutations would be associated with colistin
resistance, diverse colistin-resistant subpopulations of the original isolates may have been
present prior to the start of experiments. In terms of stability of resistance,
colistin-resistant subpopulations within the original isolates were different from those
that acquired resistance following exposure to colistin [26]. The stability of the resistance in diverse subpopulations of the original
isolates were likely unstable [10], and
therefore, most of these subpopulations disappeared as antibiotic concentrations were
increased. In contrast, the stabilities of resistance of some colistin-resistant
subpopulations in Type I colistin-heteroresistant isolates were high.In this study, we identified two types of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates, in which colistin-resistant subpopulations were
identified even without prior exposure to colistin. In Type I colistin-heteroresistant
A. baumannii isolates, resistant subpopulations were
selected and nearly all surviving bacteria were found to be colistin-resistant upon exposure
to high colistin concentrations. In contrast, resistant subpopulations in Type II
colistin-heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates disappeared at
high concentrations of colistin. Furthermore, the resistance of subpopulations in both types
may also be unstable. These results suggest that different treatment strategies against
A. baumannii infections may be required based on the type of
colistin heteroresistance.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Mark D Adams; Gabrielle C Nickel; Saralee Bajaksouzian; Heather Lavender; A Rekha Murthy; Michael R Jacobs; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Selena Chiu; Anna M Hancock; Bob W Schofner; Katherine J Sniezek; Nashaly Soto-Echevarria; Gabrielle Leon; Darshan M Sivaloganathan; Xuanqing Wan; Mark P Brynildsen Journal: J Antibiot (Tokyo) Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 3.424