Literature DB >> 32896012

Set-based genetic association and interaction tests for survival outcomes based on weighted V statistics.

Chenxi Li1, Di Wu1, Qing Lu2.   

Abstract

With advancements in high-throughout technologies, studies have been conducted to investigate the role of massive genetic variants in human diseases. While set-based tests have been developed for binary and continuous disease outcomes, there are few computationally efficient set-based tests available for time-to-event outcomes. To facilitate the genetic association and interaction analyses of time-to-event outcomes, We develop a suite of multivariant tests based on weighted V statistics with or without considering potential genetic heterogeneity. In addition to the computation efficiency and nice asymptotic properties, all the new tests can deal with left truncation and competing risks in the survival data, and adjust for covariates. Simulation studies show that the new tests run faster, are more accurate in small samples, and account for confounding effect better than the existing multivariant survival tests. When the genetic effect is heterogeneous across individuals/subpopulations, the association test considering genetic heterogeneity is more powerful than the existing tests that do not account for genetic heterogeneity. Using the new methods, we perform a genome-wide association analysis of the genotype and age-to-Alzheimer's data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project and the Religious Orders Study. The analysis identifies two genes, APOE and APOC1, associated with age to Alzheimer's disease onset.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic heterogeneity; kernel function; left truncation; multivariant test; time-to-event outcomes; weighted V statistics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32896012      PMCID: PMC8074363          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  13 in total

1.  Genetic heterogeneity in human disease.

Authors:  Jon McClellan; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.

Authors:  Jeroen B van der Net; A Cecile J W Janssens; Marinus J C Eijkemans; John J P Kastelein; Eric J G Sijbrands; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Omnibus risk assessment via accelerated failure time kernel machine modeling.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinnott; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Sequence kernel association test for survival traits.

Authors:  Han Chen; Thomas Lumley; Jennifer Brody; Nancy L Heard-Costa; Caroline S Fox; L Adrienne Cupples; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  MicroRNA signature predicts survival and relapse in lung cancer.

Authors:  Sung-Liang Yu; Hsuan-Yu Chen; Gee-Chen Chang; Chih-Yi Chen; Huei-Wen Chen; Sher Singh; Chiou-Ling Cheng; Chong-Jen Yu; Yung-Chie Lee; Han-Shiang Chen; Te-Jen Su; Ching-Cheng Chiang; Han-Ni Li; Qi-Sheng Hong; Hsin-Yuan Su; Chun-Chieh Chen; Wan-Jiun Chen; Chun-Chi Liu; Wing-Kai Chan; Wei J Chen; Ker-Chau Li; Jeremy J W Chen; Pan-Chyr Yang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Genome-wide analysis of survival in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Tsung Huang; Rebecca S Heist; Lucian R Chirieac; Xihong Lin; Vidar Skaug; Shanbeh Zienolddiny; Aage Haugen; Michael C Wu; Zhaoxi Wang; Li Su; Kofi Asomaning; David C Christiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A weighted U statistic for association analyses considering genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Changshuai Wei; Robert C Elston; Qing Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Beyond genome-wide association studies: genetic heterogeneity and individual predisposition to cancer.

Authors:  Antonella Galvan; John P A Ioannidis; Tommaso A Dragani
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  A generalized association test based on U statistics.

Authors:  Changshuai Wei; Qing Lu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  A comparison of Cox and logistic regression for use in genome-wide association studies of cohort and case-cohort design.

Authors:  James R Staley; Edmund Jones; Stephen Kaptoge; Adam S Butterworth; Michael J Sweeting; Angela M Wood; Joanna M M Howson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multi-marker genetic association and interaction tests with interval-censored survival outcomes.

Authors:  Di Wu; Chenxi Li; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.