Literature DB >> 32894644

Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis effectively treated with MEK inhibition.

Jessica B Foster1, Dong Li2, Michael E March2, Sarah E Sheppard2,3, Denise M Adams4, Hakon Hakonarson2,3, Yoav Dori5.   

Abstract

Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis (KLA) is a rare lymphatic anomaly primarily affecting the mediastinum with high mortality rate. We present a patient with KLA and significant disease burden harboring a somatic point mutation in the Casitas B lineage lymphoma (CBL) gene. She was treated with MEK inhibition with complete resolution of symptoms, near-complete resolution of lymphatic fluid burden, and remodeling of her lymphatic system. While patients with KLA have been reported to harbor mutations in NRAS, here we report for the first time a causative mutation in the CBL gene in a patient with KLA, successfully treated with Ras pathway inhibition. ©2020 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBL proto-oncogene; MAP kinase signaling system; kaposiform lymphangiomatosis; lymphatic abnormality; trametinib

Year:  2020        PMID: 32894644      PMCID: PMC7539180          DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202012324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Mol Med        ISSN: 1757-4676            Impact factor:   12.137


Problem

Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis (KLA) is a rare lymphatic anomaly affecting the lungs and mediastinum of patients with a high mortality rate. No curative therapy exists.

Results

We identified a patient with a lesional mutation in CBL who was effectively treated with MEK inhibition.

Impact

Mutations in the Ras pathway, including CBL, are likely driving KLA and potentially offer a targeted therapeutic strategy for this disease.

Introduction

Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis (KLA) is a rare disorder that results in abnormal lymphatic vasculature, most commonly in the chest and mediastinum. KLA is typically diagnosed in childhood and results in significant risk of respiratory compromise, infections, coagulopathy, and early death (Croteau et al, 2014). A recent case series reporting whole‐exome sequencing in 11 patients identified a somatic NRAS p.Q61R variant in the lesional tissue of 10 out of 11 cases (Barclay et al, 2019). In addition, recently, Li et al (2019) reported on MEK inhibition in a patient with ARAF mutation and lymphatic conduction disorder leading to near‐complete remodeling of the patient's lymphatic system and resolution of symptoms. While this work has prompted investigation into Ras pathway targeting for KLA, no patients to date have been treated and no clinical trials exist. We present an 18‐year‐old female patient with refractory KLA who did not have a somatic mutation in NRAS but rather lesional cells revealed a point mutation in the CBL gene. She was treated successfully with MEK inhibition, suggesting a novel treatment strategy for this patient population.

Baseline patient characteristics

Our patient's symptoms began at age 6, when she was noted to have intermittent dyspnea with activity and frequent infections including sinusitis, bronchitis, and pneumonias. At the age of 10, she developed streptococcal pharyngitis that progressed to septic shock requiring intensive care. At that time, she was found to have pericardial and pleural chylous effusions. She also developed a large blue lump at her right areola. She eventually was referred to a large children's hospital where she underwent biopsy of her lungs and revealed the diagnosis of KLA. Histology showed lymphatic malformation with foci of spindled lymphatic endothelial cells reactive to CD31 and D2‐40. MRI showed the extent of her disease included mediastinum, lungs, right breast, and axilla, as well as spleen, and bony involvement in the sacrum and spine. She was initially treated with steroids, vincristine, interferon, and rapamycin. She remained on rapamycin for 8 years with generally stable disease but intermittent hospitalizations due to worsening pleural effusions requiring drainage. At age 18, she elected to stop therapy with rapamycin and subsequently had severe disease recrudescence. Despite restarting rapamycin, prednisone, and vincristine, her pulmonary status remained extremely poor. Functionally, she had severe dyspnea and orthopnea with chronic coughing, and inability to engage in any exercise or exertion beyond activities of daily living. She continued with intermittent large bilateral pleural effusions and intralobular septal thickening on chest CT (Fig 1A). She subsequently underwent T2‐weighted lymphatic mapping, which demonstrated bilateral pleural effusions and mediastinal and pulmonary interstitial edema (Fig 1C), and intranodal dynamic contrast lymphangiography (IN‐DCMRL) demonstrated massively dilated and tortuous thoracic duct with severe bilateral pulmonary interstitial perfusion and mediastinal perfusion (Fig 1E and G). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) revealed severe restrictive lung disease (Table 1). Her D‐dimer was also elevated as previously reported with KLA patients (Table 1), and her platelets intermittently dropped with disease exacerbations although her other coagulation parameters were normal.
Figure 1

Imaging before and after treatment with trametinib

Coronal CT image of the chest at baseline with pleural fluid and intralobular septal thickening (arrow) (A), and 3 months after starting trametinib (B).

MR T2‐weighted coronal slice of the chest at baseline demonstrating bilateral pleural effusions (arrow heads) and pulmonary interstitial edema (arrows) (C), and 3 months on trametinib therapy (D).

IN‐DCMRL coronal MIP of the chest at baseline demonstrating dilated and tortuous TD (arrow) with dilated central lymphatic networks and extensive bilateral pulmonary perfusion (arrowheads) (E), and 6 months after trametinib therapy demonstrating dilated and tortuous TD (arrow) with reduction in the extent of the dilated central lymphatic networks and resolution of bilateral pulmonary perfusion (F). IN‐DCMRL coronal slice of the chest at the level of the carina demonstrating extensive mediastinal and pulmonary interstitial perfusion (arrows) at baseline (G), and after 6 months of treatment with trametinib (H).

Table 1

Laboratory and pulmonary function tests before and after treatment with MEK inhibition

Baseline3 months after treatment6 months after treatment
White blood cells (K/μl)13.77.210
Hemoglobin (g/dl)1613.913.7
Platelets (K/μl)150243231
D‐dimer (μg/ml FEU)9.170.49< 0.27

FVC (l)

(% predicted)

1.82

48

2.71

71

3.03

81

FEV1 (l)

(% predicted)

1.75

52

2.65

79

2.98

90

FEV1/FVC (l)

(% predicted)

96

110

98

113

98

110

FEF 25–75 (l)

(% predicted)

5.05

133

6.49

172

6.85

174

TLC (l)

(% predicted)

3.02

67

4.04

80

4.36

87

FRC (l)

(% predicted)

2.01

84

2.66

97

2.95

109

RV (l)

(% predicted)

1.10

90

1.33

113

1.33

115

RV/TLC (%)

(% predicted)

36

133

33

150

31

141

DLCO (ml/min/mmHg)

(% predicted)

12.57

54

19.30

74

20.41

94

DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; FEF 25–75, forced expiratory flow at 25–75% forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FRC, functional residual capacity; FVC, forced vital capacity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity.

Imaging before and after treatment with trametinib

Coronal CT image of the chest at baseline with pleural fluid and intralobular septal thickening (arrow) (A), and 3 months after starting trametinib (B). MR T2‐weighted coronal slice of the chest at baseline demonstrating bilateral pleural effusions (arrow heads) and pulmonary interstitial edema (arrows) (C), and 3 months on trametinib therapy (D). IN‐DCMRL coronal MIP of the chest at baseline demonstrating dilated and tortuous TD (arrow) with dilated central lymphatic networks and extensive bilateral pulmonary perfusion (arrowheads) (E), and 6 months after trametinib therapy demonstrating dilated and tortuous TD (arrow) with reduction in the extent of the dilated central lymphatic networks and resolution of bilateral pulmonary perfusion (F). IN‐DCMRL coronal slice of the chest at the level of the carina demonstrating extensive mediastinal and pulmonary interstitial perfusion (arrows) at baseline (G), and after 6 months of treatment with trametinib (H). Laboratory and pulmonary function tests before and after treatment with MEK inhibition FVC (l) (% predicted) 1.82 48 2.71 71 3.03 81 FEV1 (l) (% predicted) 1.75 52 2.65 79 2.98 90 FEV1/FVC (l) (% predicted) 96 110 98 113 98 110 FEF 25–75 (l) (% predicted) 5.05 133 6.49 172 6.85 174 TLC (l) (% predicted) 3.02 67 4.04 80 4.36 87 FRC (l) (% predicted) 2.01 84 2.66 97 2.95 109 RV (l) (% predicted) 1.10 90 1.33 113 1.33 115 RV/TLC (%) (% predicted) 36 133 33 150 31 141 DLCO (ml/min/mmHg) (% predicted) 12.57 54 19.30 74 20.41 94 DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; FEF 25–75, forced expiratory flow at 25–75% forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FRC, functional residual capacity; FVC, forced vital capacity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity.

MEK inhibition repairs respiratory functional status and restructures abnormal lymphatic vessels

Based on the patient's poor quality of life and concern for imminent deterioration, we obtained expanded access to trametinib (Mekinist, Novartis) to target the Ras pathway. She was started on a low dose of 0.5 mg daily (0.01 mg/kg/dose) for tolerability for the first 28‐day cycle, with plans to escalate to the phase 2 pediatric dosage of 0.025 mg/kg/dose daily with subsequent cycles. However, within 4 weeks of starting the medication the patient reported she subjectively felt much improved with resolution of coughing, dyspnea, and orthopnea. Her exercise tolerance markedly improved, and she started training for a 5K race during the second cycle of therapy. Based on her subjective improvement, she was maintained on the low dose of 0.5 mg daily for three cycles. Follow‐up PFTs after cycle 3 revealed significant improvement in her restrictive lung disease as well as normalization of her D‐dimer (Table 1). Chest CT revealed near‐complete resolution of her pleural effusions and intralobular septal thickening (Fig 1B). After six cycles, she had further improvement in her restrictive lung disease based on PFTs (Table 1), and repeat T2 lymphatic mapping revealed resolution of pleural effusions and pulmonary interstitial edema (Fig 1D) and IN‐DCMRL demonstrated resolution of pulmonary interstitial perfusion and marked improvement in mediastinal perfusion (Fig 1F and 1H). She continued to show a dilated and tortuous thoracic duct, but significantly reduced mediastinal collateral flow. Her prior requirement for intermittent drainage of chylous effusions completely resolved. Overall, therapy was well‐tolerated with only grade 1 adverse events including acneiform rash, brief eosinophilia that quickly resolved, and brief hematuria and proteinuria that also quickly resolved. She continues on 0.5 mg trametinib daily currently, now 12 months after starting therapy and continued resolution of symptoms.

Identification of CBL mutation

Prior to initiation of trametinib therapy, the patient had re‐accumulation of pleural chylous effusions, which were drained and fluid collected for research. Deep coverage WES of >330× detected a novel somatic mosaic variant, c.2322T>G:p.Y774*, at 4% frequency, in the CBL gene (Fig 2A), which was subsequently shown by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to be present at a low level (Fig 2B). The DNA sample from the CD31 cells was exhausted during the experimental process, and the input sample for the ddPCR experiment was suboptimal and could not be repeated. As the mutation is predicted to truncate the protein, which is a negative regulator of Ras signaling thus in turn exerting gain‐of‐function effects in the Ras‐MAPK signaling pathway, and the patient demonstrated robust response to therapy, we elected not to pursue a new sample. All other biological samples (blood, saliva, skin fibroblasts, normal lymph node of the groin) were mutation‐negative.
Figure 2

Mutation analysis for the KLA patient uncovered a novel variant in the CBL gene

Deep coverage exome sequencing Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) view of CBL c.2322T>G in DNA sample that was derived from CD31‐selected cells from pleural effusion fluid. The alternate allele fraction was 4% (20/493).

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) result with five mutant positive droplets (circle) from a low concentration leftover sample which resulted in ˜ 0.005% fractional abundance.

Mutation analysis for the KLA patient uncovered a novel variant in the CBL gene

Deep coverage exome sequencing Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) view of CBL c.2322T>G in DNA sample that was derived from CD31‐selected cells from pleural effusion fluid. The alternate allele fraction was 4% (20/493). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) result with five mutant positive droplets (circle) from a low concentration leftover sample which resulted in ˜ 0.005% fractional abundance.

Discussion

Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis is a devastating disease, marked by characteristic intrathoracic lymphatic anomalies and hemorrhagic‐chylous effusions, with spindled lymphatic endothelial cells on histology (Croteau et al, 2014). The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classifies KLA as a subset within complex lymphatic malformations. The vast majority of diagnoses are made in children, but rare reports of KLA have been reported in adults as well with a similar presentation (Safi et al, 2014). KLA has an overall survival of 34% despite aggressive multimodal therapy (Croteau et al, 2014). Many of these patients have been treated with rapamycin after success was reported generally for complex vascular anomalies, including KLA (Hammill et al, 2011; Adams et al, 2016). In addition, lymphatic cells isolated from patients with KLA were shown to have gain‐of‐function mutations in genes involved in the PI3K‐AKTmTOR pathway with decreased cell growth in response to inhibitors of these pathways (Boscolo et al, 2019). Genomic evaluation of vascular anomalies such as KLA has only just begun in recent years, with the first case series identifying NRAS p.Q61R as the likely driver for the majority of patients (Barclay et al, 2019). Similarly, other groups have identified NRAS p.Q61R from cell‐free DNA in biofluids of affected patients (Ozeki et al, 2019). In this report, we describe a patient who did not harbor the NRAS p.Q61R mutation, but rather a mutation upstream in the Ras pathway, CBL c.2322T>G:p.Y774*. We suspect this mutation is the driver for her lymphatic anomaly, and it is unlikely to have been induced by her prior chemotherapy, which included vincristine, prednisone, and rapamycin. CBL is a proto‐oncogene with mutations identified in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, as well as Noonan syndrome. CBL proteins target tyrosine receptor kinases for degradation, and loss‐of‐function mutations are associated with stabilization of the kinases and subsequent activation of the Ras pathway. The patient in this study experienced near‐complete resolution of symptoms and extensive remodeling of her lymphatic system within months of initiation of therapy, including resolution of prior chronic chylous effusion. The change in her clinical status was evident in her follow‐up imaging and pulmonary function tests. Of note, her improved pleural effusions from trametinib therapy may have also contributed to her improved PFT results. The resolution of lung disease with lymphatic remodeling is remarkable and potentially should change how we evaluate and treat lung disease in this patient population. The relatively low dose required for dramatic improvement in this case highlights that a small amount may be sufficient to treat lymphatic disorders, which will likely limit the side effect profile compared with the higher doses used for oncologic cases. Ongoing prospective studies are now in preparation to evaluate Ras pathway inhibition in clinical trials of large cohorts of patients. In addition, these results offer hope to other patients with lymphatic‐induced lung disease and warrant further investigation.

Materials and Methods

All studies were completed on an IRB‐approved protocol, and the patient gave informed consent. All experiments conformed to the principles set out in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki and the Department of Health and Human Services Belmont Report. Patient endothelial cells were selected by cell sorting of CD31‐positive cells from her pleural fluid and expanded and grown in culture. While not cell‐specific, CD31 was used for selection as it captures all endothelial cells, and in particular captures the abnormal spindle cells in KLA. We conducted exome capture on DNA isolated from cells after expansion in culture using the Twist Human Core Exome Kit (TWIST Bioscience), guided by the manufacturer's protocols. The libraries were subsequently sequenced for 101 cycles with a paired‐end mode on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000. All the raw reads were aligned to the reference human genome using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA), and single‐nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions were detected using the MuTect2, a somatic variant caller in GATK package that uses local reassembly of haplotypes method to detect low‐frequency somatic mutations. The mean coverage depth was 338‐fold. ANNOVAR and SnpEff were used to functionally annotate the variants. Subsequent gene prioritization was performed on the basis of deleterious prediction and biological relevance by referring to the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database, which resulted in a somatic CBL nonsense mutation as the most likely disease‐causing candidate. ddPCR was performed on DNA with somatic candidate mutation and DNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using the mutation detection assay: CBL pY774*, Homo sapiens (Assay ID: dHsaMDS412920293, Bio‐Rad). Each DNA sample was mixed with a primer pair and two TaqMan probes, FAM (mutant sequence), and HEX (wild‐type sequence) per manufacturer's instruction. Droplets were made using the Bio‐Rad QX200 Droplet Generator (Bio‐Rad), and PCR was performed on Bio‐Rad QX200 PCR system (Bio‐Rad).

Author contributions

JBF, DMA, and YD designed the study. JBF, DL, MEM, SES, DMA, HH, and YD acquired and interpreted the data. JBF, DMA, and YD treated the patient. JBF drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

H.H. is a scientific advisor to Aevi Genomic Medicine Inc., and he and CHOP own shares in the company. The other authors declare no competing interests. https://www.lgdalliance.org/ Review Process File Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

1.  Signaling pathways and inhibitors of cells from patients with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis.

Authors:  Elisa Boscolo; Patricia Pastura; Kathryn Glaser; Jillian Goines; Adrienne M Hammill; Denise M Adams; Peter Dickie; Belinda Hsi Dickie; Timothy D Le Cras
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Sirolimus for the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies in children.

Authors:  Adrienne M Hammill; MarySue Wentzel; Anita Gupta; Stephen Nelson; Anne Lucky; Ravi Elluru; Roshni Dasgupta; Richard G Azizkhan; Denise M Adams
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus in the Treatment of Complicated Vascular Anomalies.

Authors:  Denise M Adams; Cameron C Trenor; Adrienne M Hammill; Alexander A Vinks; Manish N Patel; Gulraiz Chaudry; Mary Sue Wentzel; Paula S Mobberley-Schuman; Lisa M Campbell; Christine Brookbank; Anita Gupta; Carol Chute; Jennifer Eile; Jesse McKenna; Arnold C Merrow; Lin Fei; Lindsey Hornung; Michael Seid; A Roshni Dasgupta; Belinda H Dickie; Ravindhra G Elluru; Anne W Lucky; Brian Weiss; Richard G Azizkhan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis: a distinct aggressive lymphatic anomaly.

Authors:  Stacy E Croteau; Harry P W Kozakewich; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Steven J Fishman; Ahmad I Alomari; Gulraiz Chaudry; John B Mulliken; Cameron C Trenor
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  ARAF recurrent mutation causes central conducting lymphatic anomaly treatable with a MEK inhibitor.

Authors:  Dong Li; Michael E March; Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza; Charlly Kao; Christoph Seiler; Erin Pinto; Leticia S Matsuoka; Mark R Battig; Elizabeth J Bhoj; Tara L Wenger; Lifeng Tian; Nora Robinson; Tiancheng Wang; Yichuan Liu; Brant M Weinstein; Matthew Swift; Hyun Min Jung; Courtney N Kaminski; Rosetta Chiavacci; Jonathan A Perkins; Michael A Levine; Patrick M A Sleiman; Patricia J Hicks; Janet T Strausbaugh; Jean B Belasco; Yoav Dori; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis, a newly characterized vascular anomaly presenting with hemoptysis in an adult woman.

Authors:  Fadi Safi; Anita Gupta; Denise Adams; Vasuki Anandan; Francis X McCormack; Ragheb Assaly
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-01

7.  A somatic activating NRAS variant associated with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis.

Authors:  Sarah F Barclay; Kyle W Inman; Valerie L Luks; John B McIntyre; Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi; Alanna J Church; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Shamlal Mangray; Michael Jeng; Sara R Kreimer; Lori Walker; Steven J Fishman; Ahmad I Alomari; Gulraiz Chaudry; Cameron C Trenor Iii; Denise Adams; Harry P W Kozakewich; Kyle C Kurek
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Detection of NRAS mutation in cell-free DNA biological fluids from patients with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis.

Authors:  Michio Ozeki; Yoko Aoki; Akifumi Nozawa; Shiho Yasue; Saori Endo; Yumiko Hori; Kentaro Matsuoka; Tetsuya Niihori; Ryo Funayama; Matsuyuki Shirota; Keiko Nakayama; Toshiyuki Fukao
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.123

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Treatment of severe Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis positive for NRAS mutation by MEK inhibition.

Authors:  Guy Chowers; Gadi Abebe-Campino; Hana Golan; Asaf Vivante; Shoshana Greenberger; Michalle Soudack; Galia Barkai; Ilana Fox-Fisher; Dong Li; Michael March; Mark R Battig; Hakon Hakonarson; Denise Adams; Yoav Dori; Adi Dagan
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.953

2.  Sirolimus in the treatment of kaposiform lymphangiomatosis.

Authors:  Jiangyuan Zhou; Kaiying Yang; Siyuan Chen; Yi Ji
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 3.  Osteopathy in Complex Lymphatic Anomalies.

Authors:  Ernesto Solorzano; Andrew L Alejo; Hope C Ball; Joseph Magoline; Yusuf Khalil; Michael Kelly; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  KRAS-driven model of Gorham-Stout disease effectively treated with trametinib.

Authors:  Nassim Homayun-Sepehr; Anna L McCarter; Raphaël Helaers; Christine Galant; Laurence M Boon; Pascal Brouillard; Miikka Vikkula; Michael T Dellinger
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.