| Literature DB >> 32894163 |
María Martínez-Valladares1,2, Elora Valderas-García3,4, Javier Gandasegui5, Philip Skuce6, Alison Morrison6, Verónica Castilla Gómez de Agüero3,7, Maria Cambra-Pellejà3,7, Rafael Balaña-Fouce4, Francisco A Rojo-Vázquez7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Benzimidazole resistance is associated with isotype-1 β-tubulin gene F200Y, E198A and F167Y SNPs. In this study, the recently described polymorphism E198L was reported and analysed in Teladorsagia circumcincta.Entities:
Keywords: Benzimidazole resistance; EHT; FECRT; Polymorphism; Teladorsagia circumcincta; β-tubulin gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32894163 PMCID: PMC7487696 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04320-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Anthelmintic resistance level for each flock according to the FECRT, including the lower confident limit (CI), EHT and percentage of the allele frequency before and after treatment
| Flock ID | FECRT | Lower CI | EHT (Hdd) | Mean % C and % T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
| 1 | 100.0 | 100 | 11.3 | 10.4 | – |
| 2 | 100.0 | 100 | 2.5 | 8.0 | – |
| 3 | 100.0 | 100 | 4.0 | 8.7 | – |
| 4 | 100.0 | 100 | 6.2 | 18.1 | – |
| 5 | 100.0 | 100 | 1.5 | 12.7 | – |
| 6 | 100.0 | 100 | 4.0 | 5.8 | – |
| 7 | 100.0 | 100 | 1.7 | 24.2 | – |
| 8 | 100.0 | 100 | 18.9 | 12.0 | – |
| 9 | – | – | 91.6 | 65.8 | – |
| 10 | 98.6 | 96 | 32.9 | 24.8 | – |
| 11 | – | – | 22.4 | 12.0 | – |
| 12 | – | – | 17.1 | 10.1 | – |
| 13 | 100.0 | 100 | 24.3 | 6.8 | – |
| 14 | 100.0 | 100 | 33.3 | 11.9 | – |
| 15 | – | – | 19.6 | 8.2 | – |
| 16 | 96.8 | 92 | 30.9 | 11.9 | – |
| 17 | 97.1 | 89 | 23.5 | 11.1 | – |
| 18 | – | – | 12.2 | 13.4 | – |
| 19 | 100.0 | 100 | 23.5 | 8.2 | – |
| 20 | 96.1 | 92 | 43.7 | 10.5 | – |
| 21 | 100.0 | 100 | 48.3 | 8.6 | – |
| 22 | 34.0 | 0 | 76.1 | 80.7 | 86.7 |
| 23 | − 110.0 | 0 | 44.9 | 60.9 | 85.8 |
| 24 | 58.5 | 27 | 59.3 | 75.6 | 86.0 |
| 25 | 100.0 | 100 | 43.6 | 34.5 | 90.2 |
| 26 | 17.0 | 0 | 72.3 | 42.8 | 92.5 |
| 27 | 60.0 | 25 | 71.3 | 71.1 | – |
| 28 | 87.9 | 73 | 34.5 | 45.8 | 84.8 |
| 29 | 7.2 | 0 | 93.4 | 80.3 | 86.2 |
| 30 | 69.4 | 41 | 41.0 | 57.1 | 89.5 |
| 31 | 97.9 | 92 | 42.6 | 45.3 | 92.8 |
| 32 | 42.1 | 0 | 54.4 | 60.5 | 91.2 |
| 33 | 88.1 | 69 | 40.3 | 65.3 | 88.7 |
| 34 | 91.3 | 75 | 61.6 | 78.3 | 91.1 |
| 35 | − 100.0 | 0 | 89.6 | 78.4 | – |
| 36 | 100.0 | 100 | 35.8 | 52.7 | 88.5 |
| 37 | 100.0 | 100 | 40.2 | 50.1 | 90.8 |
| 38 | 97.5 | 90 | 71.7 | 58.9 | 89.3 |
| 39 | 100.0 | 100 | 19.7 | 31.3 | 82.3 |
Fig. 1Percentage of gastrointestinal nematode species detected in each flock before (a) and after (b) treatment. Y axis represents the percentage of each specie and the X axis the flock identification. As shown in the legend, the blue colour indicates the percentage of T. circumcincta; the orange, Trichostrongylus spp.; the grey, Chabertia ovina; and the yellow, Oesophagostomum spp
Fig. 2Sanger sequencing results of the three codons 198, 199 and 200 of the beta tubulin gen of T. circumcincta obtained from 6 resistant flocks sampled before (a) and after (b) treatment. The order of the flocks in the figure is maintained from the top to the bottom in the two columns-before and after treatment
Fig. 3Sanger sequencing results of the three genotypes obtained after sequencing individual L1 larvae of T. circumcincta. a Susceptible homozygous genotype for glutamic acid. b Susceptible-resistant heterozygous. c Resistant homozygous genotype for leucine
Fig. 4Plot graph and linear regression parameters between the frequency of each nucleotide (C and T) in the codon 198 of T. circumcincta, obtained by pyrosequencing
Correlation matrix between the FECRT values, EHT values, C frequency, T frequency, mean frequency (C and T), percentage of T. circumcincta per flock, percentage of T. circumcincta carrying the leucine (LEU) amino acid at codon 198
| FECRT | EHT | % C | % T | Mean (% C and %T) | % | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FECRT | 1 | − 0.770** | − 0.764** | − 0.724** | − 0.738** | − 0.130 | − 0.638** |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.465 | < 0.0001 | ||
| EHT | 1 | 0.782** | 0.730** | 0.743** | 0.286 | 0.755** | |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.077 | < 0.0001 | |||
| % C | 1 | 0.929** | 0.966** | − 0.005 | 0.722** | ||
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.976 | < 0.0001 | ||||
| % T | 1 | 0.984** | 0.101 | 0.794** | |||
| < 0.0001 | 0.542 | < 0.0001 | |||||
| Mean (% C and % T) | 1 | 0.037 | 0.761 | ||||
| 0.821 | < 0.0001 | ||||||
| % | 1 | 0.621** | |||||
| < 0.0001 | |||||||
| % | 1 |
** P < 0.0001
Multivariate linear regression analysis indicating the P-value of the model and B as the regression coefficient with their corresponding P-value
| Model | Dependant variable | Significant independent variable(s) | B | 95% CI of B | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | |||||||
| 1 | FECRT | Intercept | 0.334 | 0.000 | 117.106 | 90.679 | 143.533 | < 0.0001 |
| % T | − 1.245 | − 1.878 | − 0.613 | < 0.0001 | ||||
| 2 | EHT | Intercept | 0.671 | 0.000 | 8.732 | 0.383 | 17.081 | 0.041 |
| % T | 0.888 | 0.681 | 1.096 | 0.000 | ||||
| 3 | EHT | Intercept | 0.670 | 0.072 | 10.195 | 1.942 | 18.448 | 0.017 |
| % T | 0.597 | 0.220 | 0.974 | 0.003 | ||||
| % Resistant | 0.420 | − 0.040 | 0.880 | 0.072 | ||||
The strength of association is represented by the coefficient of multiple determination (R2)